|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Viaggiatorenotturno www.juzaphoto.com/p/Viaggiatorenotturno  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF 50mm f/1.4 D Pros: Quality / price ratio; Building, Weight / minimum footprint. Cons: AF older and hood sold separately. Opinion: It 's my favorite optics! It is used around 200 euro (I took years ago to a shamefully low price) and offers a new optical quality that is much more expensive dream. And 'course perspective that goes well for both the FX format DX is, I use it on D90 at the time, making it an optical portrait spectacular. Do not wait to be able to afford an SLR FX to exploit even more its characteristics making it the optical Reporting by not ever detach from the stain. Coming from the zoom kit, the first click will notice sharpness and image quality from another planet. At full aperture is a bit 'soft and is objectively difficult to get a focus millimeter .. but already at f / 2.8 is a razor (see to believe: http://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=257771&l = en). The blur is fantastic as are the colors and the contrast: do not really need post production. The size and weight make it a view to always carry everywhere, senza seem Martians with the bazooka (when traveling in developing countries is important), the construction is solid, I will mount the metal hood of the 35mm f / 2 D .. so is proof of any urto.rnrnIl major flaw is that the AF is slower and noisier than the younger generation but is physiological given the years he has on his shoulders. For the kind of pictures that I do not find a particular problema.rnrnE 'a piece of history of Nikon and, in my opinion a "must have". If you find it in good condition and at a good price must be yours! sent on January 23, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 35mm f/2 D Pros: Quality / price ratio; Building, Weight / minimum footprint. Cons: AF older and slower than the new releases. Opinion: I shot with this lens, mounted on D90, for almost an entire 3-week trip in Madagascar .. without hardly ever change it. And I found great. There is no doubt that the quality that offers amply repay the approximately 200 Euros which are used to buy it used. At f / 2 is actually a bit 'soft .. but by f / 2.8 returns already recorded images and with a touch "Nikon old style" magnificent. To do reportage is exceptional both for its size (you can bring to the subjects without intimidating), both for the weight (take him anywhere without effort), both for the construction, especially if you care mounted its original metal lens hood (you can slam anywhere and he did not bat an eyelid). The blur is not what the cousin 50mm f / 1.4 D (the only other optics that use now), but it's nice and still head and shoulders ahead of the zoom from kit.rnL'unico flaw in my opinion is the AF .. we are talking about a perspective of several years ago and technology has made many strides. For the kind of photography I do is commonque more than enough. With the lens hood I have not had any particular problems of flare .. just not going to cercarselo all costi.rnHo tried a couple of times the new Nikon 35mm f1.8 G .. there is history: the new will be even higher charts in hand, but in practice there is no game we are on two different bands. The 35mm f / 2 lens D has higher quality, is built better, has a blurred more pleasant, is indestructible .. and in fact after years and years worth more than a used version of the new G. rnrnPer Finally, a "must have" if you find it in good condition and at a good price take it! sent on January 23, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED Pros: Quality / price ratio in its class, compact, high excursion, metal clasps. Cons: Flare when you have the sun side. Opinion: I have this light for almost 3 years. Socket used and paid 140 euro has done to great his duty. In its category (18-55, 18-105, 18-135, etc. ..) and in this price range in my opinion is the best lens. Starting from the constructive conception is older and therefore more solid. The attack in the metal than the plastic of his successors sibling, is a feature not to be underestimated. The hike from 18 to 70 does not make it a true all-round prorpio but has less distortion than the 18-105 problems. Clear more than its price would suggest. The only drawback is the flare which stumbles when the sun's rays entering the picture from the sides. The halo is striking and very difficult to remove in post. Enough, however, always use the lens hood and do a little 'attention in such situations. Excellent first lens, I use it in tandem with the 70-300 VR and I have traveled far and wide. sent on March 02, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Best quality / price ratio, VR, versatile, compact, FF. Cons: Very few considered the cost: dim and lose some 'quality over 200mm. Opinion: For me it is the best tele-zoom travel in the end consumer. It covers all the focal lengths from medium telephoto to telephoto. In relation to cost guarantees really good results. Especially between 70 and 200mm is sharp and resolute. The reduced dimensions allow to carry him everywhere. The wide range of focal lengths allows a wide variety of shots: between 70 and 135 is a large optical portrait, climbing the well is exploited in portraying subjects during travel over that to make photographic hunting. The stabilizer works well and is a great help for those who make reports and take in sometimes difficult conditions. The AF is precise, fast and quiet (obviously not at the level of optics pro). Flaw on the side brightness but on the other hand, the price would grow exponentially (as well as the size). Above 200 You need to be a little 'more attention during shooting because the performance drop. The 70-300 VR is never missing in my travel backpack, and the fact that it can also be mounted on FF I will set in for a long, long time. sent on January 20, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 12-24mm f/4 G ED Pros: Sharp, contrasty, excellent color rendering, compact, flexible zoom range. Cons: Flare in certain conditions and high price. Opinion: I tried for 7 consecutive days, and in all possible situations this light mounted on a Nikon D90. For a mid-level amateur is a real pleasure. Compact but solid construction with a petal-type hood small and not at all cumbersome. I was impressed favorably for sharpness and contrast. I immediately found pleasing colors. In practice the images made from it do not need pp. The zoom range allows you a good variety of shots and it is almost always remained attached to the machine. The autofocus is very fast and very quietly. Personally I did not feel particularly limited from maximum aperture (f / 4) given the type of lens and its predominant use. In extreme backlight conditions occurs a little 'flare. Nothing to do with what happens with the optics kit but perhaps considering the cost you would expect even better. The price one is perhaps the only real weak point (in fact I rented), however, is a lens that is not repented. sent on January 18, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
