|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Aneworld www.juzaphoto.com/p/Aneworld  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Zenit Helios MC 44M-7 58mm f/2.0 Pros: Colors, sharpness already in TA, bokeh always nice, price Cons: No one saw the cost of 30 euros Opinion: Fantastic optics, as the detractors of Russian optics say, this copy of the Zeiss Biotar 58mm f2, is fantastic. I was lucky enough to find the latest version, 44M-7, at 30 degrees, never better spent money. The bokeh is always nice, at least until F2.8, but for the swirly it takes a bit of practice. RECOMMENDED STRA lens for those looking for original shots with a special touch. The only mole, suffers so much backlight, but if you like, flares are insured. Vote 9 sent on August 20, 2020 |
 | Nikon AF 180mm f/2.8 D ED IF Pros: General optical yield, bokeh, metal body, velvety lampshade internally and incorporated. Cons: AF noisy and uncertain even in light conditions (on D7500), chromatic aberrations with open diaphragms. Opinion: Excellent optics. Light, versatile and with superior optical qualities. A must have for stolen and discreet shots. Great for portraits with a pasty bokeh with beautiful flooring. The AF is objectively years old. Suggested at the prices of the current used. If you are looking for optical quality better than the previous non-AF version, if you are looking for the speed of the AF, better the latest versions (not so cheap). sent on February 17, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm X-Pro2 Pros: ISO estate, constructive solidity, retro aesthetic Cons: Optical sight, non-orientable display, ISO dial Opinion: A machine that I have owned for a few months now, and that I use mainly with vintage optics or with the 27mm XF f2.8; I get to say one thing right away: it's a flagship, and you can see and feel it in every detail. Although exceptional machine, it is not immune to some defect, or at least for those who write; In detail: 1) viewfinder, cute and definitely of wow effect, but then in everyday use? With tele optics?! Practically useless. Great only for street/landscapes/grandangles. 2) a little slow at times, I can not say that it has inputs, but for sure, it does not always maintain the same fluidity (quiet ly have always used it in high-performance); 3) the quick menu often makes you inadvertently set the automatic bkt, big break that there is no option off; just navigate the menu, hover over it, and zac! You find it activated. Fujifilm wake up!! Otherwise it is an ESPERTMACHINE machine, when you hold it in your hand (and it is not true that it has grip problems, and I have big hands) you immediately feel that you have a machine, a solid and reliable tool. The ISO estate is then something exceptional, it looks endless without any kind of noise, even above 11,000 ISO there is a very light grain but very very pleasant. The jpg files, are the usual and famous jpeg Fujifilm house, beautiful and ready-made in 80% of cases. To conclude, if you do street, reportage and landscape, I recommend it with my eyes closed. sent on January 22, 2020 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.4 G Pros: Light, colors, bokeh, weight. Cons: AF can be improved Opinion: Excellent lens all to do that if understood, and managed (focus first), gives great satisfactions. Tending to warm colors, even after manual white balance, excellent in portraits and close-ups, beautiful even the BN. It's not lightning in the focus, so I don't recommend it for sports photos or action. Rated 8 sent on February 07, 2019 |
 | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 Pros: manufacture, color, precise focus, bokeh Cons: Slow focus and manual only, lack of optical stabilization, almost poor indoors and with high ISO Opinion: Premise: With this lens taken used by a month, I entered the Zeiss world and Macro photo. Also, I want to point out that I shoot with a Nikon D7500, also advance this, because as many of you know, the sensor/optical pairing is not always just a matter of budget. Given the necessary premise, I wanted to know if it is normal that I can never pull out photos that satisfy me in closed environments and/or with high ISO; For high I mean between 650 and 1200. Do you also have the same experience? are Makro lenses only from outside? Or is it a lens designed for FF sensors that Mal marries with the APS-C of my D7500; Which by the way also has a low density and resolution?! Frankly having read some absurd reviews about this lens, I was expecting something more; But maybe I'm making a wrong use of it. 1) gastronomy. I hope that those who have fun to make jokes, have read my post (and understand the meaning), I have already made it a newcomer to the macro photo and the world Zeiss; What more do I need to do? And then I was hoping that in serious blogs like these, it was appreciated a little intellectual honesty. I have done macro photos outside and it is exceptional; But if one asked me if it is the double nicer (since it costs twice as much) of the Nikon AF-S 105mm f/2.8 G ED VR Micro (which among other things has stabilization and AF); I don't feel like saying that. 2) high ISO. That is really Marco50 you amaze that on your FF machine that costs twice as my you have a better yield/resistance to high ISO??!? What about?!? Crazy:-o Sincerely to read your reactions, you make me come the doubt that you speak more by faith than for anything else... Since I got it I have not disconnected from the machine (and I have a Nikkor 16-80mm f2.8-4, and a Nikkor 50mm f1.4), and I can confirm that those few times I comeback the Nikon zoom, the feeling is embarrassing, plasticous etc; But one of my doubts is that maybe it is a lens born for FF sensors and maybe rich and dense pixel, etc. and I confirm, indoors, in the house, even in the daytime, I do not notice this excellent quality, if then the other vs optics are of the 18-55mm , then I understand a little.... Thank you sent on December 26, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
