|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Barone www.juzaphoto.com/p/Barone  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Weight, Building, Value for money, nice sharpness, flare virtually absent, very nice sunburst Cons: FF of the distortion is heard and chromatic aberration there Opinion: As already summarized the strength of this lens lies in the excellent value for money, being a full frame that offers excellent pictures with excellent sharpness at a price not exorbitant. The construction is great, is weather sealed and despite the age of 8 remains very competitive with a lot of lenses available on the market, even if it does not take the comparison with the 16-35 2.8 L USM II but it costs twice as much. A feature seen in the photos in my gallery is the absence of flare accompanied by a beautiful sunburst eni backlighting to smaller apertures. FF of the distortion can be heard as well as chromatic aberrations there are species maximum aperture, but nothing irreparable in post-production, in the wake of the defects would point to the small excursion that the front lens, otherwise a lens that despite age still enjoys an excellent reputation and a fantastic value for money. sent on September 24, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Impressive sharpness, lightness, excellent stabilizer, construction, speed, value for money, tropicalization Cons: Nobody except the limited opening. Opinion: A lens with emotions, characterized by great clarity, remains to this day one of the sharpest zoom lenses on the market, compact, lightweight and fast, has the Canon stabilization system that allows you to take even in unfavorable light, bridging the gap with goals brighter. The ability to capture the detail is comparable to many fixed lightness allows you to use where weight is not required (I shoot often going in snowboarding and a 2.8 gets heard) does not show chromatic aberration even at the widest aperture, the Distortion is virtually absent, the soft blur characterizes it, only sore suffers a little in backlit conditions of extreme flare, this brother more than 2.8 L IS II USM that is absolutely not comparable by price (twice) and construction (4 years of technology are felt). A lens with which to make portraits from fear and sports photo day. An excellent value for money can make accessible the optical quality of typical bianconi also to those who do not want to spend big bucks. A lens that once purchased hardly think of selling sent on September 24, 2011 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: High Resolution, Quick AF with 19 cross-type, Burst 8fps, Full HD video recording, Value / Price Cons: Performance at high ISO, AF system area, Complexity of customization AF system Opinion: The Canon 7D is the representation of the trend of Canon's "churn" specific machines and less heterogeneous direct competitor of Nikon. The 7D is a sports car, characterized by an AF system nevrile that allows to freeze the fastest of the subject, of course accompanied by suitable lenses and the right customization, without excessive effort. The 19 cross-type points and 8fps burst to allow performance crazy, always if configured. In particular, the Spot AF system is moving. The ergonomics of this machine is very pleasant, although Canon forget to put a Joystick on the battery grip and also definitely makes the work less hard sports photographers who make their speed must. The image quality is good and the 1.6X crop factor allows you to make the most of the telephoto lens. Seen in this way does not explain the price "modest" compared with the performance, in fact, is the trick. The AF rapid and nevrile is not very precise when using the system in the area and in the case of the system to 19 pointsautomatic priority to the closest subject is not always better and you have to give us a little used to it. A slight tendency to overexposure is nothing irreparable. All in all looks like a perfectly straddling the professional and semipro, it suffers from all the problems that accompany the APS-C sensors, high ISO performance in which you notice the loss of detail already ISO 1600 (still remediable in post-production) placing a limit of decency to 3200. Probably a couple of Mpixel less it would have made a wonderful machine and if it was accompanied by a FF sensor would definitely be a PRO, but would not have a price so affordable, which is why an advanced amateur will find it fantastic as a Pro will be satisfied spending is not excessive for the services it provides. As for the video capabilities Canon is the undisputed queen of the industry. In essence, the 7D is a machine for who knows what he wants and knows how to get it, at a reasonable time in the study of the complex buteffective AF system are achieved remarkable results, accept a reduced sensor and using some time to clean up the snapped file to ISO too high, in other words you can not have it all, not at that price. Remains by far the best APS-C on the market with the best quality / price ratio. sent on August 03, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
