|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
SalvoCmos www.juzaphoto.com/p/SalvoCmos  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Build quality, weight/footprint, AF, focal range, flare resistance, almost no distortion Cons: 6-blade diaphragm, f3.5 aperture Opinion: I have owned this lens for about 1 year, purchased used as new for less than 300 €, before writing this review I took some time both in daily use dealing mainly with landscape photography, and reading other reviews to look for similar characteristics or defects with my specimen. A 16-35 eq, has nothing to envy to the older brother series L 17-40 "indeed"... some reviews complaining about AC at TA I consider them senseless, that is, who photographs a "landscape" in broad daylight at TA ? it makes no sense is a lens that should be used always and only from f5.6 to f11 gives the maximum precisely between f8-f11 "possibly" combined with tripod, the IS is not necessary with these focal lengths I managed quietly to make shots at dusk freehand at f8 1/20 apart from this, in my specimen combined with a 70D I do not find loss of sharpness in any focal length used (perhaps because I use it as it should) and present instead the problem of vignetting with CPL filter, or rather the filter can not polarize the entire scene and creates halos, this at 10mm (I own a Hoya Slim) so it is good to climb at least on 12 better 14mm when using it and if the situation allows it, other Pros are listed in particular the resistance to flare is surprising, in fact I did not need to buy the hood and photos at sunset against the light I made several, only note (but you know when you buy) as mentioned on and the variable and max aperture of f3.5 that goes to the detriment of night photography, but not doing much (the Aps-c are not devoted to this genre) is not a big problem, but the raggera of the 6 lamellae is not as beautiful as that of a 9 this yes, in conclusion considering what it costs (in the used market) I would say that it is the definitive ultrawide in the canon house, if you do not want to consider the various tokina, sigma sent on September 19, 2022 |
 | Yashica ML 50mm f/1.7 Pros: Construction, fluidity rings, blurred, sharpness from 2.8 Cons: I can't find any, you have to know how to use it being full manual Opinion: I was lucky enough to find it at home together with an old yashica frI of my dad, and when the "vintage" are back in vogue I bought a 15 € adapter and I put it on, experimenting a little with its qualities with my canon 70D mainly on close-up set of orchid flowers etc. obviously it is a full manual lens so you have to take a little hand with the adjustments especially with the light meter and at the beginning it is not easy, but once I made the eye I immediately appreciated the qualities, especially in the close up genre for the precision of the MF ring, the blurred that vabè and comparable being a 50mm with similar aperture to which I was accustomed and to the fidelity of the images that I will talk later, in fact having a Canon ef 50mm f1.8 stm I wanted to compare them from TA up to F11, (f2.8-f4-f5.6-f8-f11) well, right away the canon returns very saturated colors compared to the yashica that behaves much softer in colors, in addition to this difference to TA both are comparable as IQ and detail on the point of MF but from 2.8 up the old man shows the teeth returning more detail especially from 5.6 to f8 compared to the canon that shows more color but loses in the details kneading them a little as if hiding them from the strong saturation .. what to say from that moment in canon remains at home while he always travels with me, especially when I make targeted outings for that genre, a valid 50tino that still has a lot to say, if you find it in good condition take it into consideration because it will give you a lot of satisfaction sent on April 25, 2022 |
 | Canon 70D Pros: display, wi-fi, speed, file quality, viewfinder, construction, battery life, in short, a semipro Cons: unique perhaps the ISO seal not exceptional Opinion: C and little to say, as mentioned above it is a semi-professional I use it since 2018 and being an amateur to date does not give me reason to replace it, it has everything you need and if flanked by quality and bright optics even the only defect (iso seal) can be moved forward by quite a few stakes. What to say surely given the prices of the used I would highly recommend it to those who come from entry level SLRs or maybe from older machines or simply to those who approach the SLR for the first time, this camera will give you a very long carpet in front of you sent on January 23, 2022 |
 | Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pros: The new CAP of the SLR, already sharp at TA, brightness, speed mf, Cons: Boh maybe the lens is too small and does not give "others" a good impression :) Opinion: I was very fought in the choice of this "toy" actually the size of the lens and the general dimensions do not give much confidence, it seems the lens of the smartphone camera, but I am reminded of an ancient proverb, that is that in the "small barrel there is the good wine" Well this asphalt toy literally the lens in kit the 18-55 f3.5-5.6 is stm with the same focal length at 24mm .. As soon as I mounted I did some tests already at full aperture the 24 pancakes although it has an imperceptible vignetting and much sharper and more detailed than the 18-55 at f4, the colors are warmer and already from here I said everything. I continued the test up to f8 on both the 18-55 recovers a little at f8 but if you turn the photo well you always notice that the pancake is sharper and more detailed ... in short, I would recommend it, on APS-c will be a salvation in all those situations of low light, outdoors and indoors, it will give you the opportunity to keep the iso at bay and this will make the difference being known the poor tolerance of the APSC, in short, for about € 100 put it in your room and you will not remove it more combined with the 50mm f1.8 are the 2 fixed that I always have with me useless the original hood, rather I put 2 aluminum step-up rings that I had in disuse one of 52/55 and the other 55/58 that will do both as a hood and in addition will protect the lens from accidental falls, wide-angle side ... well if you really miss the 18 (which then on aps-c so wide angle is not) sooner or later take a REAL wide angle a 14mm or better yet a 11-16 Vote 10 sent on January 04, 2022 |
 | Rollei Compact Traveler Mini M-1 Pros: materials, quality of the head, possibility of reaching the ground, compactness Cons: not or found, maybe the bag too small Opinion: Purchased used, arrived as new a tripod that I was looking for some time to make low shots or even razor, has an excellent strength and build quality, also excellent head, I put on my 70D with a vintage 80-200 of over 800g, did not make a fold. when instead the head of my landscape andoer twists a little the frame with the same paired ... in short, I definitely recommend it instead of many other Cinesate, especially if you find it in the used on 40 € sent on January 03, 2022 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Lightness, stabilization, all-rounder Cons: not very bright, plastic bayonet, not very incisive at high apertures and at the ends of the focal length 18e55, Af not from safety Opinion: Used in combination with the 70D and a good lens to start exploring the focal lengths a little and to understand what you want to do, the sharpness is not bad if used for landscape photos from the maximum from f6 to f11 on tripod returns good shots, freehand a little less since you have to close to always find something wrong in terms of focus and sharpness. Forget the photos inside, maybe with the mobile are better, in fact one of the reasons that I stopped using it and look at something else and just because during family celebrations, birthdays and various events, the photos were really almost on par with a mid-level smartphone, this is due that being f 3.5 to 18mm rises quickly to 5.6 you have to raise the iso a lot, minimum at 800 (and my 70d does not like to go above 800) or you have to use the flash (which I do not like) so I left it at home more and more often in these events because it became a tribulation to bring in some decent shots, and the decent ones had to work heavily in post to make them worthy of a camera that still has its say. But all this is also normal, over time the need arises for a brighter optics that adapts to more situations ... so thanks to this lens that allowed me to make my bones and thanks to the fact that statistically the 18-55 I used it largely at 24mm for landscapes I took the 24mm f.2.8 pancake, the 50mm f1.8 already I had it and then goodbye optics in kit, more in the if I feel the need for a wide angle take a tokina 11-16 f 2.8 and so on .. sent on January 02, 2022 |
 | Canon PowerShot SX220 HS Pros: Zoom 14x, IQ, materials, dimensions. Cons: Raw Lack, Adjustment ring loses sensitivity, battery life Opinion: It was my first quality compact in 2012, (paid almost 200 €) used in many contexts from birthdays in the family to trips to mountain biking, has always done its duty very well. I use it all 'time when I can not bring the camera. The only flaw is precisely the lack of Raw files and the central adjustment dial has lost precision and is therefore unusable in manual mode, (But after 6 years) for all other modes works perfectly. I would like to sell it but not wanting to give € 50 to keep it with me until it dies: D sent on March 19, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Lightness, Quality / Price, Sharpness, fuzzy TA, minimum focusing distance Cons: Noisy MF Opinion: I've been using this lens for about a month, and my first lens because I found it mounted on a Canon 70d. I have no terms of comparison with other objectives or standard kits, but I can assure the goodness of this 50ino very bright and clear, with beautiful colors, hardly the need to act in PP certainly worth more than what it costs. In my gallery "first shots" you find the first photos with this lens.rnCerto that on APS-c format is a little long (80mm Correspondent) so I do not recommend for everyday use, it still remains an optical use specific as a portrait, closeup, detail, surely I will combine it soon with an 18-55 STM to wear every day. Being compatible with FF will always remain in my equipment. Highly recommended to combine with a zoom lens to make specific photos of higher quality .. sent on March 15, 2018 |
 | LG G4 Pros: Light, elegant and unique in its style thanks to the different leather covers, rear camera, usability, QUODHD battery display, well-high audio. Cons: Little ergonomic, rear laminated that action frame when you hold on a plane, WiFi little powerful, front camera does not drive me crazy but average Opinion: I own Lg G-series (purchased always used with warranty) from the G2 which currently works great in everything. I switched to the G4 in 2016, the first thing that struck me and was the display, watch a movie in 4k and also enjoy the sound and good level thanks to the stereo output. A phone so and difficult to replace in fact I keep it with me for a long time, but because it does not give me the need to replace it especially with the pixel louncher that never tires. -Great camera-scary display-average autonomy-navigation speed and internal menu great-feeling good-front camera average-good reception does not have the sensor unlock (but who cares) does not have the security Pach upgraded to 2018 (But who cares) does not have the port type C (I do not see all this indispensable utility) I just installed an external launcher (Google Pixel) to vary a bit the usability that of course after 2 years "even the eye wants his part" surely I will have a few events Cato some other pros but hardly the cons. sent on February 23, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
