|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Franz_88 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Franz_88  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X-T2 Pros: Colors and white balance, hold noise that does not make the FF regret too much, direct commands, lenses with PDC reduced almost comparable to the FF, viewfinder Cons: Zoom lenses not always up to par, good lenses are often without rain resistance and/or with slow autofocus, the dynamic range is not that of a FF even with low use (maybe some think so), conversion in the machine of unnerving raw, zooms are not much ( if not the red xf) Opinion: I've been using it for 9 months and I give it 8.5/9 as a vote and system. I took it when prices dropped for the arrival of the xt3 otherwise I wouldn't have taken it. It's a great trade-off between FF and 4/3 portability. The image quality, especially in shadow and light recovery, is not that of Sony a7 mark2. But it's more than enough and the noise holds it up well. Fixed lenses provide shallow depth of field that does not make the FF regret. The colors and white balance are very good compared to the Sony a7 and the Panasonic GX 85 that I had. The main problem for is the lack on the best stabilizer lenses, the lack of protection to the water (although in the rain nothing happened to me with the 23 1.4) and the lack of a fast autofocus. They didn't make the series A and B lenses. The perfect machine does not exist, this is a great all-rounder (although the FF in the matter of weights and costs are not far away) sent on September 04, 2019 |
 | Panasonic GX80 / GX85 Pros: Suitable for street and beginner (but not for those who are more advanced), Autofocus, JPEG OK, conversion of RAW in the machine, electronic shutter Cons: Horrible viewfinder (compose blindly), tends to overexpose, when in manual you can not set the compensation for exposure (set the ISO automatically and do not know according to what criterion), the noise is already high at 600 ISO at night and in the long Exposures, ISO minimum up to 200, with the Olympus 12/40 is not small, a mountain of creative effects that are useless (I would have preferred a series of simulations series of films and not these crap), battery life ridiculous even for a Mirrorless Opinion: Vote 7 I passed after 4 years of Gavetta from RX100 to A7 II. But I had always remained doubtful if I had taken the longest step of the leg. Maybe I had to go by degrees and try the 4/3? Could I save a little by weight? With the stabilizer maybe I would have achieved similar results by lowering the ISO? The A7II is a machine too obvious and not suitable for certain places? Well, two weeks ago, I got busted by a hostel locker, and the A7 stole it from me. So I had to get a new car and I wanted to give a chance to the 4/3 world and I took the GX80 with the Olympus PRO 12-40. All used at about 700 euros. In the shop looks OK but then after a week you realize the pros and cons. Advantages-Autofocus: shots and makes the photo immediately without hesitation. You can also click on the screen and focus and shoot. I'm not street photography savvy but this looks like the appropriate electronic shutter machine. A big advantage over the A7 but useless if you do landscaping and architecture-converting the RAW into the machine. Unfortunately the modes are basic. I also don't understand why you can't add creative filters in post. However you can fix and share the photos disadvantages... many, too many. It seems to me more a cell phone than a horrible camera-viewfinder. You realize it with the use, not in the store. You never see anything on fire and adjusting the dioptrs is not necessary. Compose at random-exposure meter. It's a little absurd. The Whites burn them often. I shoot the photos by underexposing-1 or minus-2/3. The spot exposure would have the advantage of moving the spot (with Sony being fixed and central) but it seems to me that it works randomly. There's an offset of-1ev from the A7. How does it get a correct reading of the sky brightness equals 0? -Manual exposure. There's the auto ISO as on the A7. But on the A7 you also set the compensation. I want the center of the image A-1 or + 2 holding fixed times and diaphragm. Well on this toy the thing is not possible.. You can are in aperture mode or exposure-to-noise duration. At 600 ISO, at night, you get the noise that the A7 has at 4000 ISO about. With the stabilizer and a focal length of 50 mm equivalent shooting sharp pics at 1/4 of a second. With the A7 I need 1/10-1/12 of a second. So the A7II still has advantages instead of the GX80. Compared to the RX100 I see no differences with the GX80-size. With the 12-40 Pro is not small. If I take other Olympus Pro lenses we are at the levels of the full frame lenses. The costs from new are similar. Maybe with the used is better. You should go on non pro lenses and don't know if I'm going to invest money on this system. It also doesn't go unnoticed and so it's risky in places where you have to go undetected. It is unfortunately pretty and flashy and 6 people stopped me in one day wondering what car it was.. -Unnecessary creative effects. I would appreciate if they were the simulations of the films of Fuji, but these unnecessary effects only waste space in the menu-battery: In two hours of shots have gone two notch on three of the battery. Ridiculous though I've already had mirrorless/compact. It also does not indicate the percentage of the charge sent on July 05, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
