|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giupy71 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giupy71  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Genesis C5 Pros: Quality/price ratio, finishes, accessories, quality/weight ratio Cons: I bought it just out making it come from Poland to 249 euros, today it is located in Italy with the best market price to 178 euros. The head in kit is medium-low but of quality with the inevitable millimeter of play in the fastening. You can not use the center column horizontally (competitors with same characteristics do not do better) Opinion: The only regret that I bought this kit was to have paid 249 euros and bought on the fly because then the last. With the new supply the price went down to 229 euros and today it is also at 178 best price and 200 euros approximately on average. As said this the only regret. For me it was a bet, won and twisted only after trying it. Compared to the usual Manfrotto does not disfigure in anything. Made i China? Yes, but with excellent finishes and excellent quality. Initially there were not many accessories, the feet for snow and rock cost 70 euros, today the accessories are many and at low prices. Necessary the round feet because with the system of the steel tips, the standard ones offer a surface of contact with the ground really minimal or not stable. The articulated feet, easily replaceable with the tools supplied, cost 15 euros including shipping and make the system truly exceptional. The head does not consider it sufficiently precise and stable when working with 1DS3 and super Tele, nothing less than the other of the same band but with higher costs. Buying the monopod of the same series and its base at 3 feet, about 80 euros further, open endless possibilities. For example with the Manfrotto 393u head connected to a "telescope" and the monopod to the camera, I had no problems working with almost 4000mm equivalent! Also, using binary slider from 60 cm for video footage, it has no problems if mounted only on the tripod if you avoid the extremes of racing. I found it very good in combination with tripods to an extreme and monopod with foot stability base at the other end. Very positive tests with Gitzo heads GH3780QD, G2271M and G2380, all heavy heads and costing much more than the kit under consideration. Some have taken me for crazy for the pairing that would seem risky. I found myself well. As others say there is an opportunity, now offered by many, to use a leg as a monopod, splendid but my advice is as far as said to buy the single monopod as an aid in the most extreme use together with the kit. The center column and Li and you cannot use it horizontally or skewed for macro photos. Personally I found more practical and stable add the slider track connected to the ball head and the other extreme on the ground, is not mistaken for a millimeter and the macros are managed great! I got to try other similar statives of brand and not but I found nothing that could make me think of other product. Is it any better? Yes, but you have to go up 2 or 3 times as costs. Great for advanced and small professionals sent on September 23, 2018 |
 | Canon 1Ds Mark III Pros: All the pros of a flagship, spectacular colors, ergonomics, weight balance, strength, grain effect at high ISO similar to old films, no destructive "programming" for non-original batteries, currently with little expense you have all the accessories, many accessories not canon of high quality and low price gives emotions, pp not necessary, simple and immediate menus, fantastic even with old goals and in some cases even better. Huge battery life. Printed photos even more beautiful. Evergreen Cons: Lacks endless modern functions (not always a counter), for night photos better to have a stand. Monitor that serves little (all the photos are good otherwise the recoveries in PP), is addictive Opinion: Bought by pure chance, or better, on eBay winning the auction at a price much lower than the average because with many signs and deprives some accessories, but with 6 months warranty. I would have expected them to go down again before buying it, but luck would have it that I paid for what I had promised myself to spend. After the first uses I decided to buy flash, fc stand for large cameras, wifi accessory, Cf cards to also use the second slot, portable PC with which to connect, field monitor. He gave me and gives me emotions, concreteness. A car that makes beautiful photos and excites you does not follow the fashions, the mega iso are for others. This helps you not to make nonsense, to grow. I made night views, with a stand and an old lens considered "dark" and not L series, bought used at 87 euros, setting 100 iso f11 and 30 seconds, which left open-mouthed owners of 5d mk4 with L series lenses. the modern you are brought to raise the ISO while with this you have to learn and experiment, I do not love the PP and the files that come out are practically ready. Often not thereI change because they would lose the personality of their little flaws. But what's more boring than something that deprives your photos of part of those "defects" that are the characteristic of the photo, of your touch? How to have sex with a beautiful woman or with the woman you love, in the first case you have sex with a "photo" with the woman you love you have satisfaction that no one else can give you, you do not want to stop, unique feelings that also another love will give you differently.rnThe technical data? All fuffa! Try it, look what it produces, print and frame at 50X70. Crazy auto focus, if you do the comparisons between bodies with automatic systems say it is lower, but with you go on the safe side. Despite having the colors among the strengths, the B & N portraits with the high ISO are spectacular to make the "grain" Ilford way appear ... rnIf you have to take pictures from the internet it is much better. If when you shoot you are interested in a photo that somehow comes out, sharp and upset in PP, yesfind it better. If you are not looking for personality, there is a world waiting for you. If Caravaggio had been a photographer he would have had a Canon 1Ds Mk3.rnMulti they complain about the weight, mah ... Used for 4 hours in a row, a thousand shots are tired but pleasantly satisfied. Even others with the battery grip look like toys or almost. She is balanced, resistant, solid. Wait to see what comes out on video, no video will prepare you to the wonders of a good 70X50 print.rnHo bought a canon 22-55 barrel, 60 euros, they came out spectacular images, nobody believed this. For heaven's sake, it does not make videos, who cares! It does not have 50 Mpixels, better! Surely it is difficult to find the machine to be placed side by side. I'm curious to try the next series 1, the 5d mk4 I like but it is still too expensive. I look forward to the new flagship to buy a great 1dx less than 2000 euro.rnProblemi to high iso? The stand what is it for? Not that I can solve everything, but ... Then I'd like to know who the idiot turns offlights before taking a picture or who wants to take pictures in the dark? sent on February 08, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
