|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Angela Platania www.juzaphoto.com/p/AngelaPlatania  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS III USM Pros: comparing it to version 2 NONE Cons: COMPARING IT TO VERSION 2. lack of sharpness. Opinion: I decided to review this lens that I bought, kept three days and returned to the sender, because DISGUSTED by the non-quality of this optics. I don't know if I have trimmed a defective optics and to know I would have to try another. But this one, new, is really pitiful. I used it twice, at the Zarrillo concert, because I use this lens for concerts, and I had brought only this, the photos taken were blurred, blurred, without detail. A colleague of mine told me, look it was probably because of the lights that were actually quite poor. But the next day I went to the POOH concert and this time not to risk, given the event, I also brought version 2. At that point I had no more doubts. The optics were poor, not very sharp, not very focused and gave that blur effect. I repeat I do not know if the optics were defective, but I certainly had no intention of sending it to canon for a check and waste time. I can only say that if Canon makes a lens like this... Don't complain if you lose customers. I will try to borrow this lens, for another concert, but now they have almost all switched to sony and those who do not have sony have switched to mirroles and therefore has RF optics, so if you are going to buy this lens, I advise you to try it first... For concerts it is not good at all. For other things I don't know. sent on September 26, 2023 |
 | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM Pros: LIGHTNESS, WEIGHT, BULK... aesthetics Cons: sharpness, poorly functioning stabilizer, quality, price Opinion: I had this perspective and I paid it really a lot. I believe, from direct experience, that it is the optics, medium-high-range, worse. It looks good, aesthetically. But qualitatively it is lower than the optics of 150 euros. Just purchased, and to have it I had to request it, it had problems with the stabilizer. Canon changed it for me. But the result... is that the quality was really poor. Versatile sin, but useless. Especially for those who love details. Very disappointed, I traded it in, losing almost half, also because nobody wanted it. Sold out. sent on March 06, 2023 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II Pros: sharpness, weight, stabilizer, brightness, autofocus Cons: I can't find a fault Opinion: It is the lens that I use the most, and it is also the lens that the R series loves the most, I would say that it is the winning combination. I often use it freehand, because with the stabilizer it has and the weight is not excessive, I can maintain excellent stability. I saw the price of the new one, when I bought it it was cheaper, it had just come out. Removing the previous model, which was really at least 50% lower by comparison. I would buy it two more times. I recommend it to those who want quality. sent on November 15, 2022 |
 | Canon 90D Pros: sharpness, obviously with quality lenses, stability, robustness, tolerable noise, having tried other aps-c Cons: to be an aps-c I would say that it is the top among those of the canon. Opinion: I have various canon cameras from the eos 5 dmarkIII, to the R, to the 6d, passing through the r6 (I did not like the colors) and having had almost all the aps-c of the canon, then starting with the 20-30-40-50, the 40 and 50 the ugliest were a middle ground just to get out an incomplete camera, while the nikon churned out, aps-c higher, then I had the 60d, my favorite, which I still have, and the 70 that in short I keep it because selling it off is not the case, I skipped the 80. Cmq among these I have no doubts the 90 is superior. More than the 60d, which was my favorite. Of course you can't compare it to full frame, but the price is not comparable either. For me the vote is ten, vote dictated by the fact that an aps-c sent on August 26, 2021 |
 | Canon EOS R6 Pros: resistance, dual sd slots, sharpness Cons: distorted colors, especially red. Video with non-realistic colors, 20 megapixels, the price Opinion: I bought this camera and kept it only for a week, I tried it with several lenses and with all of them it performed very well with regard to the quality of the focus. But since I'm not a videomaker, I was shocked by the poor video quality and above all by the colors not very realistic and off. I tried all the customization profiles, but the RED for this camera does not exist, sometimes it turns it into magenta, sometimes into violet sometimes into brownish. The files are clean. Even raw does not need any manipulation. I didn't get to see if it overheated, also because I made very short videos in 4k. For the price it costs it is disappointing, obviously for me. I'm sure you need special precautions to adjust the colors and maybe updating the firmaware, probably there would have been a change. But I had the chance to go back to the shopkeeper and I did. The lack of megapixels is "heavy". sent on July 12, 2021 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
