|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Simone.80 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Simone.80  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony A7 III Pros: Stabilized sensor, speed, lightness, reliability, battery, Cons: Menu still too messed up for my liking. Opinion: Usually I do not review the cameras I try, I have tried many over the years but I must say that this is really a little gem from the size. I used 2 A7lll for a wedding, about 2500 photos, in a I had mounted the 24 1.4 art (one bomb) and the other The 50 1.4 Zeiis) The 2 machines have behaved in an exemplary way, the AF lightning and always responsive, 2500 shots without ever changing batteries , photos at 95% all in focus, beautiful colors and raw management in post production excellent.. Not to mention the ISO, usually I do not go beyond 6400, when I realized that I had photos taken at 25000 ISO and were very usable I was amazed. Another point in his favor is the weight, I tripped for about 10 hours without feeling a scrap the next day. In short, a fantastic car from all points of view, except for the menu, still too messed up for my liking.. Despite better than the previous series. I think I found my size, Sony did a real masterpiece. sent on September 10, 2018 |
 | Canon 1Ds Mark III Pros: ergonomics, beauty and three dimensionality of the file, robustness, ease of use, auto focus. Cons: iso above 1600, dated display. Opinion: In my modest opinion: rnHo had this machine a lot of sauces, new, used and at the edge of the end (so to speak) all purchases, used and then offered for sale to try something more technologically advanced type 6D 5D3 o1dx .. today, I can say that having them all owned (models listed above) I say that I think this car has something that the new technology has lost with the new sensors, the naturalness of the file, the beauty of the colors and the ease of use, clearly, with all the limitations of the case from sealing at high ISO that for many it could be a major obstacle, but for me that in the end I almost never above 1600 is fantastic, the buffer that once taken a flurry (you so to speak) you have to stop to recover, the display that (despite being out in the year of the most glorious APSC entry level display sharper, she left this unworthy the display) in short, with all the limitations of the case, this machine remains in my opinion the best choice for those looking for quality andrafficca sacrificing accuracy, ISO, and advanced technology, and then you're devaluing lot will be because this lady in just over a year go out the 10 candeline.rn sent on October 19, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR II Pros: sharpness is focussed lightning Cons: heavy and cumbersome Opinion: I bought this in a shop type mediaworld, I do not know what he was doing there like a jewel in the midst of lenses 100 euro and compact digital cameras, the fact is that it is the only and unsold for many years I was able to buy it at 950 euro with Nital warranty (warranty no longer be activated by two years, but brand-nuvo .. I see that I could sell also being new to 1400, but the few times I used it, I can say that this lens will remain with me until passion for photography will not fade. now, however, I find a 24 120 f4, an 85 1.8 and this beast .. I could sell the 24 120 to get a 24 70 2.80 and keep the 85 for portraits .. I accept sugerimenti. hello and thank you. sent on June 28, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
