|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ozbezarius www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ozbezarius  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony A7 III Pros: It's just perfect Cons: It's addictive and the need to find them by force of defects Opinion: I use it at work to shoot videos but also for ceremonial photography and events and it's amazing. Since I went from reflex to mirrorless, a world has opened up. This machine has a monstrous versatility, an incredible reliability, gives you a freedom in properly exposing absurd and even if you make a mistake forgives a lot. The autofocus is accurate and fast based on the optics you use. Eye face tracking works, sometimes with a lot of people stupid, but if you want to take a portrait of a couple or a single, you crush the programmed button and hook in a nanosecond, and you really don't miss the moment. You can costume it the way you want to sew it on yourself, much more than the eos r and nikon z. It has double backup slots and only professional machines need to have it, the others... Z and R are not sorry. Which mentally ill person would go to a wedding by entrusting all his work to a single card albeit reliable and fast xqd? It also has the electronic silent snap and you don't hear a fly flying, it has the liview setting for flash use. It's an all-round machine really , in the video field makes footage of the Madonna, a soft and precise autofocus, other than dual pixels , holds up well the high iso, up to 12000 (which you want more) in pairs with a sony a7riii and two or three fixed optics is a lot of stuff. Currently the only flaw of this room is in the scope of photos a larger body and a better ergonomics while in video 4k 60 fps (which I do not use) and only 100 fps on fullhd (which are enough for what I do) is one of the most mirrorless sold at the moment but I would say with merit , I was pleasantly surprised. sent on July 24, 2019 |
 | Nikon D610 Pros: Lightweight and compact, excellent image quality, rich colors and good sharpness of the sensor. Rafica discreet for a varied use Cons: Arrangement of iso wb commands and what not arranged in a very comfortable way because sometimes you press by mistake the menu and activate the display. I would have preferred the arrangement of a d800 and d3 d4 with these commands on the wheel. It does not take much it costs so much to get them. Opinion: L 'I bought it recently so I can only give a partial judgment. It looks very compact but the precise and careful workmanship, by a sense of solidity. The controls are well laid out except for iso wb buttons and what that force to detach it from the eyepiece and look sometimes accidentally you press the menu button brings up the display, I would have preferred the following on the pulley, and a suitable control mode close to that of exposure compensation as modeli pro ... I do not think it's a change so expensive to do for the manufacturer. The images that gives are very workable, beautiful colors, excellent definition, I would say the right compromise between resolution and the file size. In fact they have become a standard 24 mp. The burst is good, although sufficient for the sport if you know the right moment to capture without having to strafe randomly 1000 photos that then you will go to trashing. Good behavior at high iso, 6400 usabilissimi smoothly. The autofocus is decent, good speed and precision, the points are piuttoI'm in the middle but compared to canon 6d are the most versatile motorcycle, also often use the central point which is the most efficient and recompose the picture in just one second, for the rest nothing dramatic. Has dual slot sd then becomes very versatile in both photo and for videos, also by a certain security to have the photos saved on well 2 memory cards instead of 1. In the video performs well except for the usual story of the diaphragm which is not it can change in live view ... but we realize? It went out on the market to 2000 Euros and still maintain a problem that belongs to entry level SLR ?! The screen is not adjustable like the d750 .. and frankly I prefer it, it gives me more security and a sense of robustness compared to d750, the reflex is to be a robust and spartan tool that has to follow the photographer anywhere in the world, with that removable sometimes walking taking it in the neck is removed, the risk of rupture. In conclusion, for now I can say it is a good reflex that you can buy at competitive prices and offers versatity and quality at high ISO, has made almost identical to the d750 and I think we can safely support this. I would have preferred a full tropicalization but unfortunately Nikon must give the quality a little at a time with the count drops, making you shell out much sent on February 15, 2017 |
 | Nikon D800 Pros: Robustness and reliability, pro commands, dynamic range and recovery shadows. Good iso management. Cons: I think only the need to have many harddisk for the rest none. Opinion: If you can not afford a room to study the degree and the cost of a hassemblad, this will not make you regret anything. I used it for studio pictures with a 60 mm micro, I can only say that he also captured too many details that I had to tone down on the models' skin. You need a robust, reliable machine and tropical conditions for scenery street or animals? It is the best, it allows you to have all the quality of the image and to bring out the merits and defects of the lens. Generates raw image a bit flat because it captures the full dynamic range of light and shadow, so images look very contrasting, but for those who need to edit a landscape or a portrait beauty, able to have all the data he needs for a post professional production. It is a machine used for sport and that's fine slow burst, otherwise imagine 30 photos in raw 50 mb snapped at 10 fps .... board should change every 10 minutes. It is designed to be laid out and studied shots or to capture the moment giusto, one click an action, stop. It is not a machine gun and the one for which it was designed not needed, in his place I would choose only d3 and d4, with photos lighter ready to be shipped in the newsroom. This reflex is specialized in photos that need processing and their time. I personally I'd use it to travel as one body, it offers everything you need, plus it's very solid and perfectly tropicalized. The advice to these genres, while for sports and even the wedding, not so much because they are jobs where you make a lot of shots even thousands in a day and sincerely handle such a heavy archive becomes rather difficult and expensive. Tell me what you think wedding photographers :) sent on February 15, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness, accuracy vr, very accessible price, convenience, general building solid and compact Cons: For the price range anyone but is not weather sealed. Opinion: It was my second objective purchased and do not regret it affatto.Credete which is one of the few goals that you feel alive when you use it? You ask them to snap and he will respond with a pernacchietta to say, ready! The VC ovviamente.Rumoroso but really well stabilized, I shot 130 and the picture was clear. I have not seen substantial declines sharpness at all apertures, Ta is crisp but a little less at the edges but it's not important if you are looking a bokeh of course, if you want a landscape shot you have to close at least f8 like all so the fact that it is dark or not is relative, considering that there are targets of focal, ie diaphragm that cost from 2000 on. Do not liken it to 70-200 f2.8 Nikkor because I have not tried it but we talk about goals for 2000 EUR guys, that I bought at 250 and does its job. negative points? None of those statements dagl'altri because it is not a fixed, all the paintings that I saw from 200 up have considerable hood. The only flaw is that it is not tropicalizato.Plasticoso but if you are looking for a goal to use instead of the hammer I do not know ... Buy yourself a hammer, they are otherwise sensitive items, any goal, maybe not out m inside you, whatever. If he were really tropical conditions it would use in any situation, because it really is true. Maybe also resists well to the rain but I do not know and I do not want to risk rovinarlo.Se someone has used in similar situations let me know, I would recommend it for portraits with studio flash, landscape, reportage and especially sport all aperto.Ps l ' I also used to dance essays in the dark in the theater, it goes. sent on January 20, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
