|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Vic39 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Vic39  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM Pros: Mechanical construction impeccabilernPeso very ridottornNitidezza estremarnAF velocissimornParaluce built and comfortable use Cons: Is not stabilized Opinion: Objective unbeatable quality / price ratio, which combines the low weight and the extreme speed of the AF brilliant clarity, capable of emulating (very near) the elder brothers of much more cost. Ideal for photo hunting stray and photos of wild birds in flight or on the run. Too bad that the reduced opening prevents the multiplication except with a very small number of bodies. The lack of stabilization is not significant for those photographing birds in flight. Raccomandabilissimo. sent on April 08, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Cost almost irrisoriornPeso trascurabilernGrande nitidezzarnCostruito with a symmetric cipher, such as Planar, allows a good transfer Cons: Construction spartan plastic ... Do not mistreat Opinion: Built according to the optical system symmetric Gauss, is a great lens to do all that, with good brightness can photograph almost anything. The sharpness is good, but having the attention of a couple of shots close to the diaphragm. Find top to 5.6. Does not suffer from specific aberrations and nelrapporto quality / price is unbeatable. Recommended to those who started taking photographs and wants to have fun. sent on April 08, 2013 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: The ratio quality / prezzornOttima solid construction with a great weight accettabilernAF particularly in AI Servo for photos to volornOttima resolution under ideal conditions (light line L + goals) rnFlow chart settings intuitive and effective semplice.rnRaffica 8 fotogrammirnOttimo live viewrnMirino and good quality screen and efficiency Cons: The sensor tends to be noisy and conditions of the subject distance kneads Opinion: It 's probably the best APS-C outstanding, remarkable both for nature photography for the macro. Even if you suffer from noise since the low ISO, with good processing offers high qualità.rnUnita files in what I consider his lens of choice (Canon 400/5, 6) gives the experienced photographer to get photos "on the fly" really significant, with results very similar to the older sisters and cost targets much higher, but with a weight quite negligible, which facilitates shooting handheld libera.rnPer the macro is an ideal machine because it offers, with long lenses (like Canon 180 or Sigma 180) depth of field than the FF, allowing aperture relatively aperti.rnNon is a machine "first experience", because it needs a certain "handle" is to shoot, and post-production. sent on April 05, 2013 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II Pros: Optical quality complessivarnQualità construction (a real tank) rnGrande aperturarnGrande sharpness Cons: It 'sensitive flare Opinion: Mounted on a APSC is a good solution, though, for the sturdy construction, weighs more than the average of similar objectives. A diaphragm 4 and 5.6 reaches the top of the sharpness, resolving well. It offers a good color transfer. The plunger system to switch from automatic to manual AF is not exactly the best ergonomics, but you just get used to it. I would say that the quality / price ratio can be considered a perfect choice. I am very satisfied. sent on April 04, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
