|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Filippetti Livio www.juzaphoto.com/p/FilippettiLivio  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8 D ED Pros: Definition and constant aperture f2.8 Cons: broken engine Opinion: I use this lens with the broken engine, for a wide angle it is not a big problem to use it in manual, if you think that even many Zeiss are only manual i don't think it's all imbeciles who buy them. I know everyone would like the beautiful toy with many devices at warp speed, what I do not understand is why Nikon did not plan to make a replacement that is lasting , instead the pieces are always the same with the risk of always breaking. I have been using Nikon for 10 years but on this aspect I was very disappointed, as the grip tires in the SLRs that come off, swell and wear out immediately, I had until recently also Canon and never presented me with anything like this, never any problem . sent on November 08, 2020 |
 | Canon 80D Pros: Almost everything Cons: Maybe the high ISO yield Opinion: I do not understand some who criticize so fiercely this machine, judging from the photos that makes is not absolutely bad, is certainly not the top of the range but does not disfigure with any of the competition, it is said that 1000 euros are too many for a body so, certainly the prices are High but not only of this, they sell Nikon Coolpix P1000 with ridiculous sensor 1/2.3 ' ' At 1000 euros this is a robbery...... Then returning to the camera body may seem at first glance sturdy but it is only a sensation, is much more robust than other bodies that use heavy materials, the heaviness nowadays no longer counts....... I also have a Nikon D800 almost new and I assure you it made me angry more than the Canon 80D.... With the rubber that was detached from the body, etc....... Sometimes people criticize for the taste of criticizing........ Good pictures at all... sent on April 29, 2019 |
 | Canon 5D Mark II Pros: Color files Cons: af Opinion: We are the usual ... there are those who criticize this machine for so many things, especially who has Nikon, but most do not realize that every reflex has its characteristic, I have many reflexes of various brands and twice Bought the 5D MarkII, never disappointed me. I had the Nikon D800 which is formidable as a machine when it works .. !!! Once the shutter has locked, not to mention that the handle rubber clings to the fingers and in some places it stems from the car body, and as far as I tell many of these Nikon have that defect, for charity is a great deal But the reliability found with the 5D Mark II is dreaming. I'm not a Canon partisan because I often switch from Nikon to Canon this brand will have many defects but I have never had problems and the photos always come home ..... sorry if it's a little ....... Then surely Now the 5D MarkII is far outdated but still says its ........ good shots at all .... sent on August 02, 2017 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: lightness and files even at night beautiful Cons: flash absence Opinion: I had so many reflex both Canon and Nikon full frame, I have to say that this Canon 6D deserves praise 10 and without many pretensions is one of the best full-frame SLR, the only notice that you can do at Canon is why not equip a small flash SLR Full Frame, would be very comfortable. I got together with Canon 6D also the Nikon D800 and despite the difference in megapixels sometimes behaves even better than the Nikon, I used mostly only fixed targets so the photos have not been distorted by the bottoms of bottles more or less valid. Absolute perfection for Canon would be a 6d WITH FLASH AND AT LEAST 24 MEGAPIXEL to crop better for some shooting ........ sent on March 31, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: stabilizer and sharpness Cons: perhaps the stabilizer noise Opinion: I sold and bought back many times this goal, the opinions in the comments are always discordant, can assure you it has nothing to envy to the Canon L series after many field trials, the only reason why I sold it for a pass brand to another, the buy back a thousand times and did not even need enormous lens hood attached. Soon I will buy unless you want to take the fixed focal lenses for all sent on March 21, 2017 |
 | Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/2 Pros: Finishes and substance Cons: The yield is not up Opinion: After numerous tests have concluded that the Zeiss enjoy a great name but as they are not made at all, much less this Milvus 35mm f / 2. Sharpness only in the center, clear chromatic aberration, if it had been a Canon would have slaughtered all but with this name all at his feet, along the building but the photos do not do only with building or designers .... ..the yield is a mediocre lens of 250 Euro, indeed even .......... sent on March 16, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Rugged and sharp but only with small form ... Cons: vignettaura and chromatic aberration of full frame Opinion: It 'a good lens pity that does not work well on the full frame as opposed to what others say .... but on APS-C is great pity that with smaller size is a little long ........ ..dovete believe me I have tried many and of aps-c works really well with both panoramic photos that portrayed giving a very nice color to the complexion, I have used both on full frame of aps-c for a long time and I definitely will keep ... sent on March 21, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
