|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
AndreaSai www.juzaphoto.com/p/AndreaSai  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 1D Mark III Pros: build quality excellent, precise AF and burst thrill Cons: For those not considering themselves, surely the weight. But it is not a fault, just be aware. Opinion: C is pleasant and not knead the immagine.rnLa advice to those who want to take the plunge into the world of the cornerstones of the photographic material: never disappoints. sent on March 17, 2017 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: Crisp with AF very fast high build quality with IS performance Cons: Usable only on aps-c, no hood series Opinion: Using this lens for some time and I can express my very good impression from the first scatti.rnLa quality is excellent and although it has not the red ring of L series gives eccezionali.rnOvviamente results can only be mounted on aps-c, but not there is no equivalent to FF that incorporates both the aperture to f / 2.8 that IS.rnLa color rendering think is indisputable. I had the Tamron in the same band (f / 2.8 VC) which, although good, could not compete with the canon, even on engaging dellAF low light. Well ', the cost is significant but really worth the money you pagano.rnSarò maybe I was lucky but my copy never did get a single grain of dust: no vacuum effect using the zoom, among other things, soft to the point giusto.rnLa flaw lies in choosing canon not to the standard lens hood that will be but not fitted with velvety, but costs as if it were gold plated. An absurd price disparity to be a piece of focal plastica.rnL'escursione makes an obiective handyman then both photos you possibly video thanks to the fact that you have an IS system which, although not recently from a technological point of view, it gives a great help in situations estreme.rnConsigliere to this lens to anyone who had the opportunity to invest some penny, because i see that the used prices are invitanti.rn sent on March 17, 2017 |
 | Canon 7D Mark II Pros: Great professional build quality and excellent AF Cons: It is a aps-c with ISO higher than average, but less than a modern FF Opinion: I'm lucky to have this machine for over a year and I can only talk about bene.rnSono increased from aps-c to FF and back a few times, but this surprised me for its qualità.rnNon I agree with those who have given feedback negative for FA and even for ISO.rnInfatti I found some ways the AF in some cases even better performance of the 5D mk iii.rnLe different ways of tracking (case 1 to 6) are well adapted to different situations and customizing separate buttons for program c1, c2, c3, it gives the ability to model the behavior of the machine without having to go from ISO menù.rnGli favorably but obviously not as much as a modern FF. To be clear, the 7d mk ii beats the 5D Mk II, but not the 5D Mk iii.rnLa burst is handled well and gives excellent results especially when combined Dual Card ultraveloci.rnLa cards is useful to handle the rescue forces of the file needs .rnIl weight is well balanced and above all with tele.rnLa build qualityIt is professional: Tropicalised and the skeleton is ultra durable magnesium. The grip makes it one with the hand and is pleasant to hear releases the shutter (also wanting muted for the most demanding) .rnIl limit is constructive on the reduced sensor: it is obvious to say that the depth of field does not make it like a FF . Maybe it is less obvious to think that the advantage of the 1.6x multiplier can see it mostly on canvas (the 70-200 f / 2.8 is priceless with this machine to the increase of focal giving) .rnAbbinata top "17-55 f / 2.8 is "fills a bit 'the gap with the FF for the portrait. This is sublime for yield and speed of AF.rnPer regarding the videos I tried tracking in live view and is really powerful: did not have even the 5D Mk iii.rnNon very even agree with those who complain battery life: 700 shots with one charge is a good result. Buy a spare batteryalso not original (eg. Patona) is a wise choice and the bulk and weight is really modest for chiunque.rnOvviamente, but applies to any body, you need to master well the characteristics and potential of giving: to me, to be passionate , it took another month to personalizzarmi and buttons to know bene.rnLa recommend to any fan who tries to have fun with this little gem. sent on March 17, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC LD Pros: Good brightness. Excellent MAF. functional stabilizer. Noise very limited Cons: Quality TA not at the top. Color slightly softer than others. Opinion: Often used on all occasions of canon Aps-c for portraits and landscapes. Difficult to do without it because it has a great versatility by adapting to many situations. Except in special projects in which I have used fixed focal, I never detached from the camera body. The stabilizer allows you to shoot with slow times and it works very well. The quality is very good and is proportionate to its price (especially on used). The MAF was always precise and rapid for its end segment. I read that someone complains about the noise, but honestly, while admitting that it is noisier than others with higher, I have not ever complained band and I never felt any discomfort. The collars are soft to the touch and have no games. As it regards the yield would say a very good compromise with respect to the most noble of canon brand. I would recommend it to anyone who wants to experience, as it should be, with modern photography. sent on April 05, 2016 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: professional product. Excellent quality in the rendering and data records. Full Frame now available at great prices. Manoeuvrable and precise. Cons: Body dated but highly qualitative richness. No built-in flash Display small and not very significant. Opinion: This is a camera body used by professionals who today have changed just because until released new hw updates. a heavy-duty machine. Take raw impressive wealth of detail. The 12 megapixels are more than enough for any print size: repeat, until recently used it professionals in the field of advertising. Dedicated to those who want to make of photography a hobby evolved. It is so precise that leaves no way to those who can not take pictures. Do not miss a shot. If you find a defect at the click is because you have done something wrong and the machine makes you notice right away. to acquire CF reader Council to remedy the known problems of the driver incompatibility with windows 08/07/10. Scaricatevi raw PC and enjoy the show. Never judged the photos from the monitor that is dated and does not make the slightest details recorded by the machine. The price of the used today (300/350 Euros) makes it attractive to anyone. sent on March 29, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Pros: Overall yield. USM. Stabilized. Cons: limited top opening. Hood almost always necessary. AF motor is not very fast. Opinion: Objectives dated but well executed. He never abandoned me and has given great satisfaction to me. Good stabilization, there is doubt the difference between when it is inserted and when not. It allows you to shoot freehand even at maximum zoom (on Aps-c is equal to a 480mm. Which is not cheap). To buy right away if it is used under 300 euro possibly accompanied by a hood. It is a viable alternative to the more famous and recent models. better performance at f / 8 looking quick and raising ISO times. On modern bodies to ISO 800 you will get spectacular photos that would envy goals that cost more than twice. Surely it is a purchase that I would recommend to everyone. sent on March 29, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: fast and accurate AF. Optimum efficiency even with TA. Beautiful blurred. Compact and lightweight. Cons: Hood necessary and indispensable. Opinion: This is an objective that, according to those who use FF or APS-c, has different characteristics and qualities. I have used it on both a format that the other and I always had excellent results in the quality and overall yield of the shots. The hood must always be mounted so as not to run the risk of ruining the result with major flare. The AF is quick and accurate, and, as obvious and predictable that it is, in TA you have to be more than attentive to the smallest displacement of the distance to the subject. Great goal. Beautiful overall yield and great satisfaction. I would definitely recommend buying possibly used in conjunction with the lens hood. sent on March 29, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Pros: Excellent performance especially on Aps-c Lightness rather fast and precise AF Cons: Engine does USM and then a little loud, but not annoying Opinion: I bought this lens to have a fixed focal length with a better yield than normal zoom. I always used to the satisfaction of Aps-c hassle to make portraits (44mm equivalent focal length.). The excellent aperture (f / 2.8) allows you shooting without flash normally difficult situations (such as in church), perhaps raising the ISO but without loss of quality '. It is here, in my opinion, the fixed focal length gives the best of himself. For portraits is very good yield. The price of the used today makes it attractive and profitable. I recommend it to anyone who wants to get more cheaply. sent on March 29, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
