|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fabrizio N www.juzaphoto.com/p/FabrizioN  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Color, Contrast, Autofocus quick and quiet location, is extraordinary and silent Stabilization, Polyphoto 10 year warranty. virtually everything Cons: Lack of dedicated housing, frankly nothing else. Opinion: I hesitated a lot before buying this lens, but after trying the latest generation of Nikkor lens, the 70-200 2.8 vrii, it had me a little 'disappointed with the color rendering too cold (like Nikon tradition) and the very high cost that would not admit any doubts. However, after the first round of the Tamron, my heart was relieved of many worries. I 'a goal which I think is worth all that it costs and that (beyond the price difference) even prefer it to Nikon for color saturation and for sharper contrast. Photos taken with this lens does not require a post boost production or to increase sharpness, stunning even at f2.8 (at least in my copy). In addition the stabilizer is king. I swear I took 1/5 of a second aiming for a static object, freehand, and the picture was perfect. Autofocus is fast, even in low light situations (by mounting the lens on Nikon d700) therefore did not give me problems itlle sports photos (Serie B football and basketball League A) allowing me to freeze baskets and shots on goal with a pleasant color feedback. Until now he has given me big satisfactions also for concerts and photojournalistic services. Being used to a lot (even postprodurre to rectify the weaknesses of a now dated D700) feeling that gave me this lens is very relieved to have me work and for having virtually rejuvenate the body machine. Among the small (and in my opinion trascurabilissime negative notes) the fact of not being able to rotate the zoom ring with the lens hood in the rest position and the lack of a dedicated housing. I found also that the construction and the materials used are of poor quality, although the optics is probably inferior to the quality of the Nikon in the overall project. Finally, the vignetting and distortion produced by the lens are not at all excessive and, deliberately, not speaking almost never with the appropriate corrections in order to maintain the sense of "environment" that this light canreturn, especially in the portraits. Excluding this, I would recommend this lens even to the purists of the brand Nikon (no ifs, ands or buts). To them I say that perhaps can not strut with colleagues, but still bring home a result uncompromising, saving a lot 'of euro to be invested in other optical sent on December 21, 2016 |
 | Nikon D90 Pros: Body ergonomics, excellent color, excellent layout of controls, internal AF motor, synchro flash Cons: Held at high ISO (is a machine that does its job very well in good lighting conditions, at least up to ISO 800), slow burst that does not allow quick bursts, thus more suited to the amateur evolved looking for excitement Opinion: The D90, along with the D700, is undoubtedly a milestone in Nikon production of the last 15 years. It 'was my first digital SLR, purchased in 2010, and after six years the use even with satisfaction (even in the workplace as a second body, for only daytime news coverage). The d90 preserves essential characteristics derived from the professional series, as the AF motor inside (which allows you to mount old optics with autofocus) and the two dials that allow for the immediate adjustment of shutter speed and aperture (not yet present characteristics in today's bodies nikon consumer category). Combined with good optical, the D90 will always produce good photos, provided that it provides a good amount of light. Already with 35mm and 50mm "G" series returns wonderful pictures, and use it remains a pleasure for both the ergonomics that the limited weight. I 'a car that surprises, especially for the excellent construction (I personally used at temperatures upat -15 ° and it did not give the slightest sign of weakness). So treat yourself to good optics, and the D90 will always return to ride. If you find it in good condition and at a fair price, I recommend you buy it and not thinking too much about, even in 2016, especially if you have little dimistichezza with SLR (with the D90 you really learn to photograph). Though I'll keep it tight. sent on April 20, 2016 |
 | Nikon 50mm f/1.4 Ai-s Pros: Infinite softness, soft colors and very warm, vintage feel. Cons: Whereas we talk about a lens of about 30 years, I think no one Opinion: I bought this lens for the price of about 130 Euros and, although its use is only sporadic, I believe that I will keep for life for soft and vintage flavor that gives to my photos. My usage is based on the experiences with nikon d80, d90 and d700, and I would be curious to know how it acts on new sensors. As for me, if you find a lower price, it is an experience ... sent on April 06, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Ductility, speed autofocus (is an afs), good sharpness for an all-rounder zoom, multiplication factor on the right (which would not have with a 70-300 standard), VR stabilizer, perfect for travel, reportage and daytime sports, beautiful blur to maximum range, sturdy construction, able to surprise in a variety of circumstances Cons: the external zoom range (could enter a little 'dust over the years, even though my will is still free though it was rather exploited), no other limit that no one who can commonly expect is aware of what is using it, and He can not understand what is the meaning and usefulness of this perspective. Opinion: I always read different opinions with respect to this view, often realizing that such judgments come from those who do not understand the usage target (really varied, but of course with some limitation that frankly I find normal). Working with this lens for 6 years (yes, we work) mostly for the purpose of journalistic reportage and sports (day), but I was able to appreciate the quality and usefulness especially during challenging journeys, where my need was that of remaining with the light backpack. I had also a way to test it on a trip to Iceland (getting really good results with nikon d700) where I did not at all regret fixed wide-angle and telephoto lenses ... But now I'll tell you a story to do justice to this lens ... precisely during this trip, I happened to meet a young photography enthusiast who, having learned of my conscious choice to take with me only 28-300, wanted to point out the following: "the 28-300? But not is a goal! When youMoney buys a 70-200! "... .... ..." And thanks to AC ***, my dear traveler in shorts in the icy wastes of Iceland "- I wanted to answer - before you drown my disappointment in a beer in the only Seydisfjordur cool bar ... that said, it is a lens that has to be understood, and that not everyone understands. it is obvious that it is right to orient themselves elsewhere, although I can say that in the most varied for specific needs, this lens circumstances has always surprised me. Ps. I have used it and I use it often on the right for street photo and excursions, also exploiting the crop factor and always bringing home good results. sent on April 06, 2016 |
 | Nikon D700 Pros: Immortal, even in 2016! Good quality up to ISO 3200, flurry, weather sealing, strength, ability to connect with smartphones, layout of controls Cons: weight (?), shutter noise, no video (but it's a camera!) Opinion: I own this car for 6 years, and still do not feel the need of an upgrade. He continues to give me great satisfaction, especially when coupled with optical quality. I use it mostly in the field of sports and photo reportage, and I can say that it defends fine again. Not everyone knows this, but using the OTG technology of newer smartphone you can connect it via USB cable directly to the device, for instant sharing of photos (that I know will NOT work with all professional nikon). A trick definitely better and safer than traditional sd wi-fi cards (way too slow and unreliable) and the wireless feature of the new nikon. One option that svecchia suddenly, making it really competitive today. Produces well-workable files, not too heavy as those produced by the new SLR. The years will probably pass, but the D700 will always remain a reference camera. Evergreen! sent on March 21, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
