|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Riccar.tonin www.juzaphoto.com/p/Riccar.tonin  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony FE 70-200 f/4 G OSS Pros: Sharpness - autofocus - construction Cons: Stabilization not excellent Opinion: I don't know what those who criticize this lens are they shooting with, with a 100 mpix Hasselblad? I don't know what you're expecting. on Sony A7iii I find it perfect, sharp already at f4, improves from f5, good performance, compact, fluid ring just right, presence of the tripod ring, very fast and responsive autofocus, even in video. Intelligent internal zoom. I don't see any reason to buy the updated version, except for the presence of the macro. sent on January 15, 2024 |
 | Fujifilm X-Pro2 Pros: Jpeg/raw quality, perfect colors, discreet in size, high iso seal, operating speed, buttons always in the right place, philosophy of use, waterproofing Cons: Beautiful optical viewfinder, great fujifilm for demonstrating this technology.. but for what purpose? it is useless; sometimes slowness in afc, but maybe it's me who does not know how to calibrate it well Opinion: I have been using sony a7 various for years, but I have always had the monkey for this body, so compact and discreet, so I took it together with the 23 f2. Coming from the color science of sony I found in my hands a jewel, fantastic colors and with great space for customization, in terms of emulations. 90% of cases I keep and use jpegs directly with few adjustments, I have almost never used raw, just because I find jpegs of a quality and with colors that is difficult to find on other systems. I was amazed by the yield at high iso, an apsc that holds well the 12800 is rare, as well as it is fantastic not to have chromatic noise but only full-bodied grain that most of the time is also pleasant and does not need to be removed. Despite being a parallelepiped it is not inconvenient to use and the keys are put in the right place, but there is also the possibility of customizing a lot. Optical viewfinder you know, useless but great technological demonstration, I used it only to make pride of this jewel. Waterproofness: I had an accident with this car, I fell into an icy puddle in the high mountains, the car fell 2 times into the icy water, it was slammed (it was more important to save your skin) on the snow several times, it remained about half an hour between water and frozen snow, but nothing, it still works perfectly, great hold. I will hardly change it, except to try the xpro3. sent on January 20, 2022 |
 | Sony FE 35mm f/1.8 Pros: Sharp, fast AF and eye AF, quiet, small, lightweight, good used opportunities Cons: Slight distortion, a bit of vignette a ta, sometimes made clinical. Opinion: Since I bought it it has become my favorite lens. I sincerely do not understand those who complain about uncertain or inaccurate autofocus as well as sharpness. I did not find these problems. Removed the distortion and the yield "sometimes" aseptic (ie very neutral in tones and colors), sometimes because it is not always so, it is a lens to have, also considering the price. sent on January 17, 2022 |
 | Samyang FE 35mm f/2.8 AF Pros: Compact, light, nice system for lampshade Cons: Vignette, sharp only in the middle, the rest is terrible, AF slow and inaccurate Opinion: A lens for those with little pretensions, it is cheap and cheap. Used with very little satisfaction on Sony A7RII. The sharpness is bad, it only improves by closing to f8. Cartoon and not a little, sometimes it is incorrigible in post. Af... we do not talk about it, slow and inaccurate, it works well only in AFC, otherwise it is wrong, even eye af is poor and slow. The af dive is too soft. In short, avoid if you have already average claims sent on November 15, 2019 |
 | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD Pros: Already good sharpness at 2.8, constant diaphragm at all focal points, chromatic yield, maf speed, reduced footprint, minimum distance maf Cons: 28mm-2.8 vignette Opinion: A large lens, sharper than the sony fe 24-70 f4, certainly the plastic construction leaves a little to be desired for the price paid, however the yield is exceptional. Nitido already at f2.8, improves by closing to f4, a f8 is a blade. Zoom 28-75 is not a big problem, some complain that those 4mm are missing, I think if a scene doesn't stand with 28mm it's probably not even with 24mm. The focus is very fast, maybe not as much as Sony's 24 70 2.8, but for this price range it's top and is compatible with all Sony autofocus modes (or at least it is on my Sony A7Rii) eye-af including , fast and accurate. The color rendering has something more than the other sony lenses, the colors are more vivid in general. The minimum distance for focus is really small, allowing you to shoot almost macros. Unfortunately it vignettes and not a little at 28mm 2.8, but it is easily corrected in post. sent on August 22, 2019 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II Pros: F / 2.8, sharpness, solid construction, including petal lens hood Cons: AF noisy and sometimes slow but precise, flare Opinion: bought last week, it ended up being an excellent lens right now. is my first wide-angle, possessed only optical ef-s and some old but good raw manuals. Touch seems to have in hand a tank, in fact the building is very solid and precise, without "smearing" me defects. the sharpness is good at f2.8 but in my opinion as the best closing of f4.5 - F5.0 onwards. at f2.8 is a bit 'of chromatic aberration at the edges (perfectly correctable in post) which decreases exponentially stopping down. the autofocus is precise but loud, in live view becomes slow (we talk about a few seconds to grab the subject). convenient switch for manual maf. the lens hood is included in the box, unlike the optical non-L home canon.rnrnottimo goal, I highly recommend it! sent on December 18, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Pros: "Range" focal, economic, focus Stm very fast, very good stabilizer Cons: Bayonet plastic, af low light, around 250 lost a bit of sharpness, no hood Opinion: It's my first telephoto, sooo happy with the purchase, it is a good canvas to start. The value for money is great, stabilized and .stm at a price accessible to all. The focus is very fast but with little light, the af crazy, but not that much. Missing the hood of course, but you can buy separately. Recommended for those who do not want to spend too much and needs a good canvas. sent on February 15, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
