|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Massimhokuto www.juzaphoto.com/p/Massimhokuto  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.4 G Pros: Sharpness even at 1.4 ... blurred fabulous ... prrcusione af .. Cons: Minimum distance of focusing .. Opinion: What can I say? .. Fantastic !! ... I use it for three years with great satisfaction .. rnusabilissimo to TA ... I file produces rich detail on the focus and real cream in zono out of focus ... well optical portrait irreplaceable !! ... Many criticize the construction but I believe the materials used are very strong and light at the same time ... I piacerenne instead a minimum distance of maf .. less ... and because 'no one vr. That when attached to a d800 and not 'obbilligati shooting at 1/160 sec .. rn sent on July 14, 2015 |
 | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM S Pros: Sharpness in TA .. 600mm stabilizer ... .. and 'zoom !!! Cons: Overweight ... zoom ring a little 'dura..meglio use it to pompa..rn Opinion: 339; crisp zoom pushed I've ever tried .. when compared with super telephoto 10 thousand Cucuzza loses a little something .. ok. (But do not always see) .. but clearly wins against various trade .. ..in telezoom including new rn80 400vr ii .. nikon ... that does not compare with Sigmone .. rnInutile.dire who wins hands low with previous 500rn 150 ... 50 500 ... .. short promosso..ma if you go back would take the C version ... the "S ..." forces you to a monopod .. rnavendo already 'the 500f4vr ... would like a 'species x optical piu'leggera travel ... RNLA version "c" .. 1 kg less ..but not having tried I not know if the same is optically livello.quindi advice to try them both before deciding rn .. !! sent on July 14, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR II Pros: Sharpness at the top, construction, speed, yield duplicate. Cons: reduction of the minimum focal distance of focus. Opinion: Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR II is an extraordinary photographic medium, suitable for sports and portrait, well built becomes a deadly weapon when working in low light thanks to the VR II prmette really time to 200 equal to 1/15 sec. excellent engraving already Ta, with 14 tc becomes a 100-280 f4 excellent, with 17 tc reach the 340mm F4.8 with a noticeable drop in performance but still soddsifacente, the 2.0 III transforms the canvas into a powerful 140 -400 f5.6, even if the fall is clearly visible species at full aperture, however, remains fully usable if you do not have large needs of sharpness,, eg birds .. the 70-200 vr II, loses flow to the minimum focusing distance fuoca reducing the focal length to 135mm massimia a problem? not for me. but I think it is a defect not suitable for a lens so expensive, otherwise very good quality, even at the edges with a light falloff at the edges really reduced compared to the previous model. recommended product to all except to those who wants to use a macro. sent on January 26, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 G Pros: focus, sharpness and color at the top. Cons: perhaps the minimum distance of focus is 85 cm nn is the maximum. Opinion: The Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 G - is truly a masterpiece, the lord of ambient light portraits, gives sharp images at the same time delicate in their passages between launching station fuoce area and out of focus, the quality is clearly visible wide open with a creamy blurred and inimitable, closing only seems to increase the depth of field ... the colors are rich and full-bodied, but not too saturated, perfect for the complexion. the focus is quiet and fast enough for the required use. the barrel is well built and sturdy at the same time light and practical, really picevole shoot. the edges not being eroded and a lens to be so specific is a good result. the major limitation is the distance of focus of 85cm ... certainly not a record, on full frame you can not isolate only the face, but just a slight crop and the game is done, on APSC is longish, and is used mostly for tight portraits. highly recommended to ritrattisi. sent on January 26, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 D ED VR Pros: construction, rendering delicate range of focal lengths covered, good performance 80 to 300mm. Cons: Unclear to 400mm, very slow in focus, very expensive for what it from. Opinion: The Nikkor AF 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 D ED VR, my first lens was a po'spinto, I needed a long lens to experiment with pictures of birds in those days had few pretensions and quality satisfy me even at maximum focal length, I was particularly enchanted by the delicate strokes of color and brilliant. where exactly was I was not nell'autofocus, far too slow, very difficult to pull a bird in flight. so, after some hesitation, I changed to the more powerful Sigma 50-500, which in addition to offering more than 100mm in the longer focal lengths, gave me a good speed in autofocus. rigurdando now the shots of the old 80-400 accustomed to yield 500 vr I seem particularly sharp, but this obviously can not be expected otherwise. I would only recommend if you need a zoom travel to photograph a bit 'of everything, with low space, but for a specific use in the fields of natural, is not great, definitely better 300f4. one final comment is reserved for the vr .. I did many tests with and without and I did not notice particular bebefici with vr on ... say that the new tecnlogia Vr II is quite another thing. optical urge a serious restoration.! sent on January 26, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S 500mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: sharpness, weight content for the type of object, autofocus rapiido, quality generala also coupled with various duplicators. Cons: nobody, one item price Opinion: Hard to find fault in this wonderful lens, the prince of the photo hunt, handy enough to be used by hand, of course after a while 'must rest ... the lens as already mentioned goes well with various Tc. With Tc 14 becomes a fast 700mm F/5.6 impossible to discern a shot with and without duplicating the above. With the Tc 17 becomes a 850mm f/6.7 very sharp, even at RT, the loss in this case is in the speed of focus, but always reliable even in low light. the Tc 20 III transforms the lens in a 1000mm F / 8 .. but we lose the autofocus, the quality thanks to the excellent TC 2.0III remains satisfactory. coupled to a reflex in aps-C allows you to zoom in really small subjects. the Vr works fine, but requires that the subject stands still! Highly recommended allowing pockets, is the only alternative to the heavier 600mm VR. limitazioi compared to the older brother are very few, indeed ..... sent on January 26, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S 300mm f/2.8 G ED VR II Pros: sharpness, speed, handling, no distortion, Cons: no one, except the price. Opinion: the Nikkor 300mm f/2.8G ED VRII is excellent throughout, I use it on both D3 D300s with amazing results, comes to sports and nature, it is useful in the ability to digest duplicators, personally I do not see a drop even with the 2.0 tc III, this 600mm f5.6 is really usable even at room temperature, the autofocus is not lightning but enough to work in low-light conditions also, of course is not really if we use the rapido.Ovviamente 300 for the nature we must also be able to approach to well to subjects, because often even 600mm not enough, especially if we use sensors full frame. on a aps-c 900 mm we get things better, but we are conditioned by good light. It can in fact replace the various giants F / 4500 and 600 mm, but it manages to be a viable alternative in situations in which has more execution speed framing and shoot, rather than mm .. I give you an example: on a trip to Kenya was a gazelle running fast to the side of the Jeep in gear, the vibration and the speed of the subject made it difficult to frame, but with the convenience of the 300 I was able to +2.0 framing it in a couple of shots with a 600 F4 would have been impossible. sent on January 26, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
