|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Auro www.juzaphoto.com/p/Auro  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 24-35mm f/2.0 DG HSM Art Pros: Impressive sharpness, fantastic colors, ART construction, a real masterpiece. Cons: The weight, but with a lens so inevitable. In addition to this, for me no one. Opinion: Great lens, aesthetically perfect, with quality tires and solid construction, zoom and fluid focus; Sharp at every focal point of a fixed and perhaps even better (see photo life review) with vibrant colors, giving the landscapes something idyllic. Since I've rarely removed the body from the body. In my model I did not have front back focus problems. Obviously this is a targeted choice given the short focal length, but if you are interested in extreme sharpness and chromatic rendering this lens is a real battle horse. Since it is not stabilized you have to be careful at guard times to avoid moving and holding hands, but it is not a problem if you like to shoot landscapes and photos that are not too dynamic. In my case it was love at first shot and I consider it the best lens I ever possessed. sent on August 17, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 D Pros: Great color rendering (equal to my 24-85 vr) resistant to flare and ghosts. Sharpness, small size and weight. Cons: For me nobody. Opinion: I have rediscovered this (anonymous and small lens) from the time I shot with film, wonderful, light and yet robust; Overtakes the 24-85 vr, which in my opinion always remains a bit soft, even though it is in manual with the same parameters as the old lens. Mounted on the nikon d750 has a great yield, superior to kit 24.85, as already mentioned, so much to hinder me to sell it. The chromatic yield is similar if not identical and the lack of superfluous vr. In my opinion, a great travel goal, not in the eye, and guarantees great shots. Highly recommended, even because it can be found just over one hundred euros. sent on May 30, 2017 |
 | Fujifilm X-T10 Pros: Excellent performance of large files and keeping of ISO, ease of use, sleek body and solid. Cons: Nothing in particular, maybe the buttons are very close, but given the size of the body ..., I have large hands ... Opinion: The own from around 15 days and I was impressed by the quality of the images and the tightness ISO, the top of the APS-C, second only to some full frame of last generazione.rnI jpg directly from the room are the best I've seen so far, better even my d750 for visual impact, performance color and white balance (I speak of visual impact, not of real antagonism to full frame) proposing the heat tone canon, according to my personal opinion. Practical and fun, I love the Q key, which allows you to set most of the functions in a few moments. The viewfinder is not bad, even the grip; colors and excellent dynamic range. I think it is a perfect machine for travel and always carry. sent on November 05, 2015 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: Image quality, ISO held stellar ergonomics and dynamic range. Cons: For me, nothing relevant. Opinion: Great car, maybe the best I've owned so far; produces files wonderful and well balanced, being able to shoot at ISO 12,800 as if they were "400". The fire system is impressive and quite specific, I could take in the war tunnels, in the dark, the only source of a candle front, which godsend! RnIl camera body is similar to that of the D7100, first owned, compact and rugged, a joy to hold. As all around the board at all. sent on November 05, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
