|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ruben.Reggiani www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ruben.Reggiani  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Manfrotto 460 MG Pros: Accuracy, weight Cons: Speed ??of use Opinion: You still use the head on the tripod principal. I like the ability to edit a plank at a time. You can manage well with thick gloves. At the moment, I would replace only with a rack. Its better to be in the architectural or landscape use, in macro defends well if the subject is cooperative, otherwise you may be a bit 'slow. I do not recommend it as the first head, maybe it's easier to start with the ball. sent on August 12, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: Optical quality, range of focal lengths, stabilizer, autofocus Cons: Brightness, no hood Opinion: Had borrowed from a friend and we used to Turin coupled with 7D.rnCome already argued in various forums on the handyman 15-85 is THE perfect all-rounder for Canon APS-C.rnDi certainly a constant aperture like his brother for FF would not have been bad, but by whom is the goals from the kit (18-55, 18-135) is a significant step avanti.rnNel where we have used was in the company of the Tokina 11-16 and Canon 70 -300L, then with 3 lenses are able to cover all your needs, all with a backpack is not too fast outputs pesante.rnPer just him, but if you want something more you can pair it with a 70-200 and with 2 lenses becomes almost tutto.rnAF and IS very good, very little wrong the first, the second will save you when there is too much luce.rnConsigliatissimo for those who want to stay with a single optical light! sent on June 18, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Focal length, compactness, stabilizer, out of focus Cons: No ring for the tripod Opinion: I was going to buy the 70-200 f / 4, but then go "discovered" this light and after some consultation on the forum I decided to prenderla.rnNon are minimally repented, indeed. rnOttica very compact, works well at all focal lengths can be used both for portraits for "hunting" lenses do not push too much. I've brought for a walk in the Abruzzo National Park for a week coupled with a 7D, it certainly is not light, but it is very usable in many situations (allows a little '"macros"). Rn sent on October 08, 2013 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX Pros: Aperture 2.8, build quality Cons: High sensitivity to flare, reduced excursion Opinion: He was hunting for a wide-angle and keep it that mounted on my 7D and I decided on this. I am very satisfied. A lot of light for interiors and great lenses. Suffers enough flare, but just be careful and use the palaruce provided. A little 'strange instead plunger system to switch between Auto and Manual focus, but you just get used to it. Highly recommended for those looking for a wide angle lens to be used with a car is not FF. sent on October 25, 2012 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II Pros: Aperture 2.8, build quality Cons: High sensitivity to flare, reduced excursion Opinion: He was hunting for a wide-angle and keep it that mounted on my 7D and I decided on this. I am very satisfied. A lot of light for interiors and great lenses. Suffers enough flare, but just be careful and use the palaruce provided. A little 'strange instead plunger system to switch between Auto and Manual focus, but you just get used to it. Highly recommended for those looking for a wide angle lens to be used with a car is not FF. sent on August 20, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
