|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bob70 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bob70  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Pros: Excellent display, excellent photographic compartment, excellent fast charging, Very attractive animations and graphics, very good sound department, more than enough autonomy, excellent signal reception both GPS and telephone and data connection Cons: Heavy,expensive, heats up enough, software not yet optimized one hundred percent and above all inefficient proximity sensor. Opinion: I consider this smartphone very cutting-edge and very pleasant to use in almost all situations: to see videos, listen to music, play games, phone, surf the internet and above all for the main reason that drove me to buy that is the photographic sector. On a photographic level it is surprising and in addition to the excellent primary sensor it is accompanied by 2 sensors.secondari more than up to the height with the possibility of shooting in RAW with all 3. Too bad for the focal chosen for the main camera which has a 23 mm focal that I consider too wide and a little limiting for my taste and for the distance between this and the periscopic of 120mm. If she had an intermediate focal point, she would have been perfect. sent on June 15, 2021 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: blurred very nice TA, sharpness of the highest level, fast autofocus and excellent value for money Cons: purple fringing in TA Opinion: Perspective that all dovrebbere have because with a low price all in all you have a view very bright but above all with uncompromising quality TA and therefore perfectly usable, good focus and excellent performance in portraits and in every moment where you can play with the shallow depth of field but perfectly usable for sporting events because of good speed and accuracy of autofocus. Sharpness very good at room temperature that becomes really excellent once you close just one stop, only flaw is the purple fringing TA sometimes a little difficult to remove sent on March 16, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: excellent construction and autofocus, good value for money, it returns very beautiful colors Cons: defining the edges very poor Opinion: as said, is a view that the price has few rivals in FF, and has many advantages including the construction, fast autofocus and a yield to honest apertures. Unfortunately at the widest apertures at the edge quality is very bad for me to limit dell'inutilizzabile and this is the biggest flaw of optics. The colors that returns are very beautiful, aberrations and vignetting easily solved and then for me instead negligible as regards the resistance to flare that all extolled I find that if the cables well but that is not an exceptional level as his little brother for aps: the 10-22 optics substantially to landscape to use a small apertures to get the best yield and homogenize sent on March 16, 2012 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: overall balance, light, crisp, great colors, a few aberrations and deforms very little but especially resistance to flare incredible Cons: construction by efs Opinion: great goal, as mentioned with a great balance with spikes of very high quality as exceptional resistance to flare I have not seen in any other optics at this level: you can shoot with the sun lens with no problem. The colors are very beautiful, negligible distortion and aberrations is quite clear from f8 onwards, although not in an excellent manner. The autofocus for what little it takes to those focal is very fast but the construction is a bit plasticky though still strong enough for heavy use outdoors. E 'can also mount filters of all kinds ... too bad it's only for aps sent on March 16, 2012 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: excellent sharpness, very few aberrations, excellent value for money Cons: vignetting really high especially at room temperature, deformation is very pronounced, poor resistance to flare, ring distances approximate. Opinion: a surprise this objective because if it is true that it has so many flaws (listed above) it is also true that it has many advantages first of all is that it offers a very focal thrust and a brightness that has always been synonymous with high costs to a to say the least attractive price and quality with truly amazing to be so economica.E perspective 'perspective that from my point of view finds its place in landscape photography especially at night because of the light sin only on the impossibility of use filters ... however, for the price he and the possibilities it opens a lens definitely recommended. sent on March 16, 2012 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: excellent body, excellent compromise between lightness, strength and ergonomics. Optimal operating speed and excellent performance of autofocus if well configured Cons: noise and banding at low iso files and very low tolerance in the recovery shadows in the post as soon as more fully Opinion: ultimately a machine evolved from the point of view of the functions of the body and speed and very pleasant to use but produces loud and soft files that require a post "realized" in raw but comtempo very good in jpeg especially at low iso. I would say a machine suitable for photo amateur sports where the overall speed and quality of the jpeg files at low iso is good and the macro where Mpixel bring benefits in detail and in the crop. Less suitable for landscapes and nature photos in low light where required time-consuming and medium and high sensitivity because the high density brings with it problems of noise sent on July 18, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
