|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Edobette www.juzaphoto.com/p/Edobette  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS RP Pros: Small, light, essential. Cons: Battery and eye tracking with subjects with glasses Opinion: Cheap camera but with everything an amateur photographer needs. Personally I would have made it even more essential, removing toy programs and various rubbish such as HDR. Passable viewfinder controls to be carefully customized, to make it practical. The battery problem is quickly solved by buying another (original) one. The glasses sometimes send her into confusion in eye tracking. sent on August 11, 2024 |
 | Canon Adattatore Control Ring Canon EF/Canon RF Pros: Solid, precise, it does not affect the performance of the machine in any way. Cons: Nobody. The real limit is the RP. Opinion: I love vintage manual machines. One ring for the shutters, one for the apertures. One for ISO. That's all I need. I was looking for a way to recreate this simple and fast control system on digital machines. With this bezel, I finally did it. Or almost. I have an RP. On the rear bezel. The diaphragms, on the front one. the timings and on the adapter ring the ISO. Actually, I would have liked the ISO on the rear ring and the diaphragms on the ring, in a more classic position. But this on the RP, it is not possible. sent on April 07, 2024 |
 | Canon RF 28mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Compact, crisp, properly built. Cons: Not received Opinion: 28mm is my favorite focal length. With the RP it's a "Street Fighter" pairing. You go completely unnoticed. Very light and very compact, it reminds me a lot of the EF 40 f/2.8 STM, another gem. Canon colors and sharpness even at f/2.8. Slow AF? I don't think so. However, in the street I use the hyperfocal. Combined with RP or R8, it's a best buy. sent on March 11, 2024 |
 | Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: Sharpness, colors, stabilizer, lightness, construction, minimal focus, blurry. Cons: Light flare backlight Opinion: Let's start with the only defect: the resistance to flare in the backlight. Compared to my previous landscape lens, the 17-40 f/4 L, this 24mm doesn't show equal ability to handle strong frontal illuminations. It's not bad, but the 17-40 was definitely better. The nature of the 24mm f/2.8 IS is another. It's travel reportage. Between the super sharpness at any aperture, the exceptional stabilizer and its lightness, typical of fixed lenses, not excessively bright, make it the ideal lens to take around the world. sent on May 24, 2021 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Construction, internal AF USM, compact. Cons: Specialist landscape optics Opinion: Hate and love with this perspective. I tried to use it for different photographic genres, as I used the 24-70 IS L f4. Nothing could be further from the wrong. It's a landscape-optimized lens. Diaphragms in which it expresses excellent sharpness from f8 to f11. Excellent flare resistance. He prefers a careful study of framing, preferably on an easel. sent on April 26, 2021 |
 | Canon 5D Mark II Pros: Image quality, colors and robustness Cons: AF in Live View very slow, low display resolution, non-posable, shadow recovery, lack of af eye, WIFI, touch screen, but above all it does not take photos on its own and you even have to think about composition and lighting of the subject before shooting, which I find unacceptable in 2020! Opinion: He is currently 12 years old. Technologically it belongs to the Paleolithic. Yet, taking a photo under 3200 iso, well composed and illuminated, I challenge anyone to distinguish it from a 2020 camera file. Of course, the years are felt, especially on the AF side and the Live View. Then I read about many people adapting manual optics on mirror less and I understand that, the playful appearance, for the photoa walker, is of great importance. The truth is that to have superior shooting quality, robustness and the functions of a modern camera, you have to spend a lot of money. But so many. An R5 currently costs more than 4000 euros. While a 5D mk2 currently buys with 350-400 euros. One feature few talk about is the viewfinder. It's huge, bright and optical. In my opinion, a photoadamator should consider it as a compromise in order to enter the Canon system, with many quality optics and flashes, at human prices, especially in the used. Of course, you can also spend a thousand euros to have the last mirror less and take photos of the kittens, with the 18-55... sent on November 28, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Ergonomics, sharpness always and anyway, stabilizer, constant brightness, beautiful blurry to 70mm, beautiful colors Canon L, Utillima macro function. Cons: I prefer the fixed optics, but this 24-70 is worth the compromise. Opinion: As in life, I never liked the "perfettine". I have always loved the peculiar beauty instead. I find it more natural, truer. For example in comparing 50 to 1.2 and 50 ART, I would have no doubts as to what to buy. Despite these my preferences, I still bought a lens that I should theoretically loathe: EF 24-70 IS F4 L A zoom that I do not understand as a focal, a low brightness and beautiful sized (compared to my lenses), sharp always and anyway. Love is tripped. A little bit celebrated but in my opinion extraordinary. sent on March 07, 2019 |
 | Canon PowerShot SX610 HS Pros: Excellent compact travel, light and with a great zoom excursion. Useful the WiFi transfer function to smartphones Cons: Small sensor with limited quality performance, optical brightness that decays as the focal zoom increases. Opinion: A good travel compact, but with obvious limits caused by the small sensor. Useful for souvenir and snapshot photos, and irreplaceable in situations where you need extreme compactness. The use combined with the reflex, which guarantees me performance of a different level, but with weight and clutter sometimes unmanageable. Use for example at the beach and on the ski slopes, both in full auto mode and in manual. It allows to regulate Iso, reading mode and Exposure Starling. Excellent the AF system with Face Detection and Tracking, in relation to the cost of the machine. sent on February 03, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: Sharpness, IS quiet and efficient, compactness. Cons: Hard to exploit Opinion: Gorgeous optics. Using a fixed 28 is not very easy. It is an optics without special effects, a wide angle not extreme, but great if you want to face situations in which to place the subject in his environment without excessive deformations. At TA it also allows a discreet detachment, staying close to the subject that gives three-dimensionality to the photo. Often images do not need further changes in the development of the RAW, because already saturation, sharpness and contrast are perfect. sent on May 02, 2018 |
 | LG L90 Pros: Battery, simple and clean, infrared and useful applications. Cons: Hd display. Opinion: My high score is due to the appreciation on the quality-price. Battery performance really, display hd, perhaps purposely chose to consume less. In fact for this size, 4.7 inches, you would not know even the hd. Useful features like QREMOTE, transforms the phone into a universal remote control using infrared, QSlide, allows you to use multiple applications at once, Qmemo, allows you to write directly on the phone like a notepad, above a photo or an email, for example. sent on February 14, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM Pros: Quality, plasticity and yield natural. Beautiful colors and focus. Cons: None Opinion: Softness in the play with great clarity portraits, almost painterly in its yield. Compared to a zoom lens, very sharp, has made a much more natural. Lightweight but sturdy, very well built. Transportable, inconspicuous. In competent hands is able to take shots at the highest level. Combined with the 50 mm, allows you to cover the main focal required to perform all of the classic portrait shots (full-length, half-length, close-up, etc.). sent on March 24, 2014 |
 | Canon EOS 33 Pros: Silent shooting, ergonomics, simplicity of the controls. Cons: Lack spot, only semispot. Opinion: Excellent semipro AF, pre-digital era, the use in some occasions, for portraits and for bn. I like the simplicity of the controls, which are characterized by levers and rollers, in place of the buttons, then quickly accessible. Double ring for the show, as per the current. The AF, for the time, was excellent in its category. Certainly not a 7D, but it's definitely better than the 5D, in fact the AF points are arranged around the viewfinder and not only localized in the center and side sensors are reliable. Its peculiarity is the noise. The film rewind provides a silent mode, slower but with low level noise. The trigger is very sweet, always compared to the 5D. The flash management is great, especially the TTL fill-in flash with dedicated course. In conjunction with the BP-300, the external power supply and the use of AA batteries, has a range "yearly", providing excellent grip, even in vertical shots, facilitated by the second shutter button. Provides over all programs andprovision in the existing cameras, even one particular priority depth of field: the aim is to focus on the closest point, then on the one farther and finally the machine snaps calculating the correct aperture. sent on June 11, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
