|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Matt46 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Matt46  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Konica Hexanon AR 40 mm f/1.8 Pros: All Cons: nothing, maybe the aperture ring too small but it's a pancake! Opinion: Mamma mia that in mind, the nex remains as large as the 16-50 considering the adapter being pancakes. Clear already at TA, a crazy knife F4.rnLa focus ring is really good and the right wheel in my opinion, on other vintage lenses need to do 3 laps to go from 40cm to infinity and it is a thing I do not like at all. The yield is wonderful especially shooting in BN, the contrast already in RAW I love it. Right now I'm selling the (75 €) because I have too many lenses from 40 to 60mm (well 6) and would like to invest in other lengths, but I think the regret sent on November 29, 2016 |
 | Zenit Helios MC 44M-7 58mm f/2.0 Pros: Crystal clear, blur typical, economic Cons: nobody Opinion: My second favorite after helios 44-2, with it shares the character but the 44-m7 is very much clearer. Bright enough, very cheap, is located less than 50 € in very good condition, with well difettucci less but not worth saving these prezzi.Non I can recommend it, a must! RNE 'compatible with virtually all SLR and all mirrorless, is that you have for me sent on October 14, 2016 |
 | Yashica ML 50mm f/1.9 Pros: Lightweight, small, cheap, crisp Cons: Built in plastic, but very solid Opinion: a beautiful lens, my favorite of yashica ml 50. 50 1.4 is unacceptable as regards the flare and the translation at RT, 1.9 50 this is already very much better. closing already at 2.8 improves notevolmenternnon costs nothing (like € 35 in excellent condition, less if ruined but for the amount that costs it is better to take it good), is in his pants pocket and fits all mirrorless with an adapter that costs anch 'it all (€ 5 from china) rnper me is a must :) sent on September 28, 2016 |
 | Olympus OM Zuiko 50mm f/1.4 Pros: Crisp as f2, Very little flare, solid, bokeh Cons: Anything Opinion: Just fantastic, in the past I have tried so many 50 1.4 but found them worse than their 1.7-1.8-2 by excessive flare and other optical defects. This Olympus I in "Auto-s" is really stunning from every point of view. Flare minimized, excellent sharpness from f2, just enough to 1.4, built so well that in 100 years we will see more in giro.rnLo blurry to me like it is soggettivo.rnIl price is about 100 € for a well maintained exemplary and with caps, unless you are not perfect specimens with perhaps the toughest nuts or mold / fungus also best left stare.rnCostasse € 150 I wouldnt! sent on August 28, 2016 |
 | Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8 Pros: Crystal clear, compact, very solid, very blurry, price Cons: Ring small maf but usabilissima Opinion: One of my favorite lenses, due to its compactness almost disappears both in the pocket and on the SLR. The sharpness is good already at 2.8 and become excellent closing of a stop ... one of the sharpest lenses vintage I've ever tried. It 'also very solid, if it falls to the ground is able to be broken on the floor! RnPer fifty € specimens are in excellent condition, for 30-40 € we will take home pieces with some damage or ailment (seeds nuts -bloccate, dust, mold ... maybe). I have paid 55 and the buy back definitely! sent on August 26, 2016 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Price, Sharpness up to 250mm, well built for the price Cons: Quality over 250mm Opinion: is used below 200 €, back to about 300, one can not ask for more. As for sony if the plays with the 70-300 G which is, I believe, around € 800 and then to nearly triple. It's fine even at TA, better closed 1-2 stops as each lens but it is already very good at wide apertures up to 250mm to 300mm have to close because it makes very good but it never eccelso.rnPer how expensive it is well built well, everything plastic but with little play. It 'sa Best Buy sent on May 04, 2016 |
 | Sony DT 16-50mm f/2.8 SSM Pros: build quality, more sharpness, SSM Cons: Flare, big and heavy compared to competitors Opinion: You have to Sonysta in Aps-c, once enabled, all other 18-55 / 17-50 / 17-70 will suck by comparison ... a real show. Crisp 2.8, top closing of 1-2 stops. Too bad for some flare in backlit despite the hood generoso.rnè built very well, it is weather sealed and very heavy compared to the various Tamron / Sigma 17-50 2.8, which says a lot about the build quality sent on April 28, 2016 |
 | Samyang 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye Pros: Economic, sharpness from f5.6 Cons: flare, sharpness 3.5 Opinion: we start with the pros, costs just over € 100 used and gives a good yield from 5.6 ... nothing to be said for the amount that you pay if the quality really painful to 3.5 (almost unusable) and the resistance to the minimum flare, but I think it is a little 'common among fisheye and grandangolarirnSe used the right and when you need it is nice, if you overdo stove. I finished for use as a wide-angle (with the horizon in the center to non-distorting) and I swapped for the Tamron 11-18 sent on April 28, 2016 |
 | Minolta AF 70-210mm f/3.5-4.5 Pros: Compact, lightweight, Economic, Bright for what it costs Cons: Nididezza, AF Opinion: Start with Pro, it is a perspective that is 50-60 €, it's the size of a can of coke, leggerino and 3.5-4.5 (economic competitors are darkest) rnPurtroppo I noticed poor sharpness also closing at F7.1 -8, I expected more, but maybe it's a problem of my esemplare.rnL'AF is not a sniper and even fast moving subjects forget! rnPer what it costs you to have for the holidays, it's in your hand luggage comodissimamente. sent on April 27, 2016 |
 | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm f/2.0 Pros: Crisp 2.8-compact, the focus ring is excellent bokeh Cons: flare, but you can use it to your liking Opinion: For the amount that it costs you to have, it is located on the 30 € with shipping by the Ukrainian or the like but it is very rare that they are in really good condition. For a helios 44-2 in excellent condition that is with the rings that have no game and no lines it takes no less than 50 € ... but it is a lens for ever! It 'really fun to play with his blurred buckshot circolari.rnLa sharpness is good to f2, f2.8 in poi.rnIl excellent to flare makes it interesting for ritrattirnè low in contrast but with a minimum of PP is resolved to its piacimentornVerdetto: from have! sent on April 27, 2016 |
 | Sony SLT A58 Pros: Light and handy, long battery life, good electronic viewfinder, Good yield up to 3200, value / price highly competitive, fast autofocus, preview PDC Cons: It does not say Canon / Nikon on body Opinion: I went from a Sony a380 this to58, the leap is heard. Not only for Mpixel more than for me could be less, but to a whole other series of aspettirncome listed in PRO is lighter and more manageable, perhaps less practical for beginning a series of buttons more than the my ex but you soon get used to. The Preview of the PDC (closes the aperture to give a preview in live view of its depth of field in that opening) is a bit 'small and I would have preferred slightly higher, but are finezze.rnLa battery lasts so much the first time I after taking 1000 photos in RAW I still had 66% battery ... doing the math should reach 3000, I do not think you get it but 2500 surpasses them with disinvolturarnil electronic viewfinder is very defined, more screen real but so is used much more than the first ... at least in my casornil first sound you hear in ISO1600, Correggibilissimo also taking direct jpeg using noise reduction. In 3200 ovviemente there more noise but is correggibilissimo shooting in RAW (I have not tried in jpeg sincerely, but the results are definitely better with the RAW JPEG camera) rnCome anticipated just above the key is the preview of the PDC, It does not seem to have the competitors in this price range, which is in my opinion the cherry on top of this Sony.rnSe was a Canon / Nikon would be the most sold in shopping malls, and in any case when someone asks "What starts with ? D3200 or 1200d? " I do not understand why not also assess this entry level Sony, snobbatissima than the other two that will always be good at those prices, but compared to58 to make a fool of. sent on November 04, 2015 |
 | Sigma 28mm f/1.8 EX DG Pros: Brightness, price of used, bokeh, 42 eq of aps-c Cons: nobody Opinion: I own the first version, and I find fantasticasu aps-c in my opinion become a nice lens fixed to street photo. It corresponds exactly to a "normal", making it a good start for fixed lens. the great sfocatornin an occasion my specimen has suffered flare ruining the photo (I noticed at home) but has always acted benernottimo price on second, is a hundred euro sent on August 24, 2015 |
 | Sony A380 Pros: Ability to use older Minolta AF lenses, excellent for learning Cons: low resistance already at 400 iso (but still bearable), already unbearable to 800, not at the top LCD, anti-dust vibration Opinion: is my first reflex, to learn not malerni preset programs (landscape, portrait, sport, etc.) are not the best, by far more satisfaction in aperture priority / shutter speed or manualernil being able to mount the old optical Minolta AF is a big plus of sony alpha, since there are excellent targets large bill to prezzaccirnlo LCD screen is tilted vertically but has a great definition, also using the live view appear many red dots (but do not use hardly ever) rnuna big minus are ISO 400 up, start to appear dots 400 and 800 already are disgusting pictures ... but it is a aps-c 2009, so it's no lamentarsirnun Another pro is the vibration turned off that " shakes "of any dust from the sensor sent on July 03, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
