|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alby85 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Alby85  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD Pros: Versatility, sharpness up to 500mm, weight Cons: 600mm soft, zoom ring for a bit hard .. Opinion: I come from 400 f / 5.6 L and 500 f / 4 IS L, so if I speak of sharpness, some comparison term I have. Initially I was not satisfied then, with the fine adjustment of the AF, everything has changed. It is true that the whole opening is detached from the trimmers but closing already f8 and without exceeding the 500mm the rendering at the level of sharpness does not matter at all .. (Look at my last photos x believe it.) But I do almost never hunt itinerant to I always shoot at a maximum of about 8mt where the lenses are not put under "effort." If I have to make appointments where I'm not sure about the distance of the subjects I bring the 500L that is more generous under that look .. the weight allows you 'Free-hand use helped by good stabilizer. Zooming is a bit hard and with a long hike. Voting 8 sent on May 22, 2017 |
 | Tokina AF 300mm f/4 AT-X Pros: Construction, weight and size Cons: Sharpness at TA, af, not complete compatibility with canon Opinion: Purchased x whim immediately seemed like a solid and well-made lens .. habitually rnUso the 500 f / 4 IS x where maybe the comparison is a dictation from my consuetudini..rnLeggero and well manageable freehand gives a satisfactory sharpness from f / 6.3 better if you can from 7.1 to f / 8 .. Sharpness x so much to say that on occasion I preferred the 70-200 f / 4 iS + 1.4X II .. because I preferred to lose but gain in speed 20mm f and nitidezza.rnSenza forget that with continuous af does not do to 7fps burst of 70d .. only on One shot or manual focus .. Otherwise is around 3-3.5..rnObiettivo that I keep just x its "rarity." . Do a 6 x vote what is written above sent on February 24, 2017 |
 | Manfrotto 393 U Pros: robustness, price range Cons: footprint, correction of the resistance on the horizontal axis is not just effective Opinion: 26ograve; a comment on my review quello.rnContinuo months later and after using it a bit with 70d and Canon 500mm f / 4 Is the first set and then heavy enough .. I guess that's a head definitely doomed to pairings where heavy expresses rather his strength and his strength! If you do not have problems of weight and size I would definitely recommend it! sent on April 10, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: sharpness in the center, build quality, af Cons: sharpness and aberration at the edges, no hood, passed in image quality from Sigma 10-20 f / 3.5 Opinion: all in all a good lens, but that requires a closure of the diaphragm at least 7.1 at all focal lengths for sharpness at the edges and a control aberration cromatica.rnin hand returns sense of robustness and build quality. af fast and accurate (dowry in a wide angle is not so essential) .rnleggendo around the Sigma 10-20 f / 3.5 seems to overcome it in IQ sent on March 05, 2015 |
 | Canon 70D Pros: gust, af, battery Cons: held at high iso, lack of slot x CF Opinion: well used to the nature reserve Bayerischer Wald, I could appreciate the burst more than enough to capture the most important moments and not so fast as to risk fill in the blink of an eye the sd card image sometimes too similar and thus from having to discard ..rnla battery after 1200 shots was still at 23% and with respect to iso nothing impressive .. holds good only in good light conditions .. if there is a shadow or a slight against the noise jumps out already at low iso .. but I come from a 600D and I can say that the jump is considerable. It 's always a aps-c and so you can expect the moon .. the image is still sharp, dettaglio.rnla focus okay unpretentious from 1Dx. sent on March 03, 2015 |
 | Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Pros: super tele economic stabilizer reference Cons: speed focus, quality of blurred Opinion: although versatile, inexpensive and can also be used like free (maybe not all day), I was not satisfied by this objective. 600D mounted on the focus is disappointing for speed and quality. stabilizer instead is really efficace.rnil weight is felt in the long run but considered the focal maximum is more than justified. sent on January 30, 2015 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro C Pros: good brightness, good contrast and sharpness. Cons: chromatic aberration evident at the edges at all focal lengths and any opening, autofocus not right at the top in less than optimal lighting conditions Opinion: goal not born to make a difference but still a good lens .. building looks solid, but economic in some respects including the focus ring to focus too sensitive to small adjustments in manuale.rnLa distance focus is almost unbelievable the you will never be far to the subject being careful to remove the lens hood! rnDi against the ability to engage the subject with the light conditions are not optimal, it definitely is not her dowry migliore..rnrimane still good to do all of aps-c where It expresses the equivalent focal length of 24-105 on FF. sent on January 30, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
