|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fabio Vegetti www.juzaphoto.com/p/FabioVegetti  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport Pros: Overall quality, construction, sharpness, autofocus Cons: Bracket a little short Opinion: Excellent lens, like the rest of the Sigma Sport and Art series. Built in Japan it comes with an extraordinary construction. The weight is an indication of the quality of the lenses. Used in extreme conditions, both in motorsport and in naturalistic, without ever having any problem. Excellent sharpness and autofocus. It allows you to get excellent shots even at 2.8 in precarious light conditions (of course with a quality camera behind it). Congratulations to Sigma, another great lens! Highly recommended! I changed bracket to have more comfort, the original for me is a little short. sent on July 22, 2021 |
 | Sigma 500mm f/4 DG OS HSM Sport Pros: Quality of construction, sharpness, colors, blurry, lightness, AF. Cons: Brace a little short Opinion: A wonderful lens. I tried it in the sports (F1) and naturalistic (safari, mountain hunting) and gave me so much satisfaction. AF always excellent, excellent sharpness also in TA, very natural colors, creamy blur. Fully satisfied. Multiplied with 1.4 Sigma does not suffer from any quality loss, never tested with 2.0. A lens that Sigma adds to its latest excellence both in the S and Art series, since Nikonista must thank Sigma for having produced such high performance and quality, in no way second to Nikkor (in fact). Unique, physiological, I have made the micro-regulation AF for a light front-focus. Stubborn lens! sent on November 18, 2017 |
 | Nikon D810 Pros: Sensor, construction, no AA filter, silent Cons: High ISO hold, requires high quality lenses Opinion: A car with an exceptional sensor, professional body, ergonomic even if not at the flagship level. Naturalistic use and its generous sensor gives fabulous and workable PP files. It needs bright and high quality optical (500 f4, 14-24 f2.8) to work the most. The pictures on Juza speak alone ... born for landscapes and portraits has become almost a handyman. The only weaknesses are the action and the high ISO, which is why it is complementary to the flagship. One of the best Nikon ever. sent on September 25, 2017 |
 | Nikon D4s Pros: Construction, AF, ergonomics, file quality, speed Cons: Nobody Opinion: Excellent machine, a flagship lady who adapts to everything. great body, built in Japan, with each button at the right place. Among the advantages definitely its speed, resistance to high ISO, AF speed, the dynamic range, the quality of the sensor that despite having 'only' 16mpx churns exciting file. Little to add a flagship is always a flagship ... if you claim as this machine gives back what we seek. sent on May 05, 2017 |
 | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM S Pros: Overall quality, materials, sharpness, color, AF, OS ... and much more ... Cons: Weight (only for untrained) Opinion: Finally got my Sigma ... I was torn between this Tamron and Sigma 150/600 ... well I would say that they are very satisfied for now, I use it on a D700 FX for two days only, but already it is love at first sight ... as had essere.rnSolo pro for now, not a professional but an amateur very demanding on sharpness, color, AF, focus ... everything perfectly for now with this Sigma. Really I do not find defects, the weight is considerable but consequent extreme quality of this goal, if you are trained no problem! RnProssimamente will post some shots ... but I must say that I found what I was looking for !!! sent on March 08, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
