JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport : Specifications and Opinions

The Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2018. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1339 €;

40 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Sigma SA: this lens is compatible with reflex and mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sigma SA-mount.

Specifications
Focal lenght	70-200 mm
Angle of view	34.4 - 12.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	11
Lenses/Groups	24 elements in 22 groups
Min. focus distance	1.20 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.21x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, interal
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	82 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	1805 g
Dimensions	94 x 203 mm
Buy
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 248000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Dramtastic

sent on September 15, 2019

Pros: Great build quality. Feature packed and adjustable on the Sigma dock. Excellent color rendition, bokeh and tack sharp! Very fast AF and works seemlessly with Sigma 1401tc. I can see no loss of sharpness and hardly loss of AF speed with TC connected. I love my Sigma 500mm F4 Sport but the 70-200mm F2.8 is maybe the best Sigma lens(of many) I have owned.

Cons: Possiblty weight but only for those who shoot for many hours hand held doing something like portrait/wedding photography.

Opinion: No complaints. Great lens! Build quality seems to be bullet proof. Price is very competative compared to Nikon/Canon equivalent. The latest Tamron 70-200mm F2.8 is also very good but the Sigma is highly recommended especially if you have already invested in Sigma systems such as the dock or teleconverters. In Australia if you register directly with the importer there is a 2 year warranty.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Emanueleb.fotografie

sent on May 14, 2023

Pros: Sharpness, lightning-fast AF, 2.8, Bokeh, stabilizer, construction, hood, customizable/upgradeable, quality/price

Cons: None I couldn't find any.

Opinion: I bought this lens last year and I can only talk about it well as it is often mounted on the camera body. I own a Nikon d500 and combined with this body it balances perfectly, so much so that the weight is more than bearable freehand. Solid and well made construction. As a pair of autofocus I can say that it is infallible, both at small and maximum distances it does not miss a shot, it also has a very precise and fluid manual maf. It can be used at full aperture while maintaining high sharpness, although sometimes, depending on the light, it may seem softer. I don't find it a fault because it still maintains detail. Creamy and spectacular bokeh. Efficient stabilizer you can shoot at 1/80sec freehand without shake. It is upgradeable and customizable via dock. What can I say is fantastic in every respect, although initially I took it to make us dog sport, now I find myself using it often for portraits. Can also be used for astrophotography, even at 2.8, if you have a tracker / mount. Taken new from the store after comparing it, trying, with the Sigma model prior to this and the Nikon vr2, and in the end I chose this one because I considered it superior to both in everything. My model did not need af calibration, immediately perfect at all focal lengths and apertures. If I really have to find a hair in the egg is the bracket slightly short when you bring it by hand lowered. The stra advice for those who have not yet switched to mirrorless, given the excellent quality / price ratio, is a lens to have in your SLR kit. Vote 10

Umberto_Buoro

sent on December 26, 2022

Pros: Value for money, MF speed, sharpness.

Cons: Loses if you shoot subjects at a distance, unusable with teleconverter.

Opinion: I bought this canvas in May 2022 used but in like new condition (about 50ina of shots), and in recent months I have used it several times to shoot at motorsport events on the track. After a short period necessary to take the hand, I consider myself really satisfied with the purchase! The tele is bright, of excellent workmanship and with a really fast focus, very comfortable your configurable keys (upon purchase of the USB base not included). The tele is not excessively heavy or bulky, the only real problem I found in conjunction with the teleconverter Sigma TC-2001, beyond the low-light photographs (which I was aware of before buying the TC) the focus goes into crisis 8 times out of 10 making the TC useless. For the record, I do not have other Sigma lenses so at this moment it is difficult for me to understand if the problem is the CT or the tele. Ultimately I am happy with the purchase, I recommend it to anyone who wants a well-made canvas, always ready to use and bright but who does not want to spend more than 1500 euros.

Mank

sent on October 06, 2022

Pros: Value for money, sharpness.

Cons: For now none

Opinion: Bought used, replacing the Nikon 70-200 Vr1, from the Self-timer Store in Pontedera I realize that the quality is bordering on the ridiculous. I send it for a check to an independent laboratory thinking I have to calibrate it but it is affected by problems of focus and strong astigmatism so I contact the seller Self-timer who refuses to give me the refund having passed according to him 14 days from receipt of the same and invites me to send it to AD Service. Leaving aside the dishonesty of the seller that I strongly advise against for purchases, the goal, after a round trip to Japan, is now incisive already at full opening with a pleasant and beautiful blur. Precise and silent focus and effective stabilizer. However, my specimen was replaced entirely by the barrel and the hsm engine and calibrated on my camera body. The weight is not felt and is certainly an indication of quality.

Notomb

sent on September 25, 2022

Pros: Construction, quality, price

Cons: Released too late and for SLR, he loses with subjects at a distance.

Opinion: Late review, just to dust off one of the many Sigma lenses unjustly ended up in oblivion at Sigma. Excellent when used at "short" distances as full-length portraits. It loses with subjects at a distance, both for blurry and sharpness. Classic lens for ceremonies or events, the name Sport is misleading. It could certainly be improved in dg dn version but Sigma is committed to making 30 fixed lenses to cover from 20 to 65mm and then is linked by the agricultural consortium L mount where Panasonic has two 70-200mm that cost a bang and sells 2 in Australia, 3 in Europe and one in Costa Rica. How could Sigma do with a 70-200mm DG DN f2.8 that costs less than Pana's f4 and is higher than the 2.8? Released late when there was now the transition from Reflex to ML, sold few and few are found in the used while maintaining high prices. Recommended for those who have top-of-the-range SLRs if used in the areas described above.

There are 11 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport

Etna, paroxysm of 23.02.2021

by Claudio Carpinato
48 comments, 4876 views [editors pick]

Max's Tunnel

by Fabio Vegetti
51 comments, 5389 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.1 MP

Etna, paroxysm 22.01.2023

by Claudio Carpinato
53 comments, 5111 views [editors pick]

New generation

by Makara
43 comments, 4033 views [editors pick]

Humpback Head Lunge

by Dramtastic
91 comments, 4443 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Wedding

by Claudio Carpinato
40 comments, 7724 views [editors pick]

Beach Handball Champions Cup

by Claudio Carpinato
39 comments, 12163 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Sebastian in Stripes

by Fabio Vegetti
52 comments, 2586 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Sainz Red

by Fabio Vegetti
49 comments, 3281 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Elephant Smile

by Dramtastic
67 comments, 4543 views

Night Patrol

by Dramtastic
56 comments, 3615 views

Avoca Male - Blondie

by Dramtastic
67 comments, 3338 views

Leopard Princess

by Dramtastic
67 comments, 2725 views

Before dawn

by Crocca95
26 comments, 1374 views

Bush Stone-curlew(Burhinus grallarius)

by Dramtastic
45 comments, 3980 views

Hukumuri

by Dramtastic
61 comments, 3204 views

Fly

by Victor75
43 comments, 4571 views

HI RES 9.6 MP

Etna, paroxysm of 23.02.2021

by Claudio Carpinato
37 comments, 2485 views

LaBelva

by Fabio Vegetti
29 comments, 2105 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Tiyani the Blue Eyed Goddess!

by Dramtastic
51 comments, 2461 views

Humpback Breaching

by Dramtastic
59 comments, 1523 views

Cheerful

by Claudio Carpinato
19 comments, 6751 views

Castle of Torrechiara

by Roberto M Parma
68 comments, 4901 views

HI RES 36.3 MP

Not always in the race goes as you would expect

by Crocca95
24 comments, 2904 views

Magellan

by Fabio Vegetti
32 comments, 1575 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The Martian

by Dramtastic
56 comments, 2113 views

Etna, paroxysm of 23.02.2021 - PART 3

by Claudio Carpinato
21 comments, 2028 views

Drinking buddies!

by Dramtastic
52 comments, 1913 views

St. George.

by Marco Brugnoli
27 comments, 1616 views

Ndzutini the little Princess

by Dramtastic
62 comments, 2012 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Hope Jungle

by Fabio Vegetti
32 comments, 1025 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Pit

by Fabio Vegetti
45 comments, 3213 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

DAS-Hamilton

by Fabio Vegetti
19 comments, 2442 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Water Hell

by Fabio Vegetti
25 comments, 2399 views

HI RES 3.9 MP

The First

by Fabio Vegetti
38 comments, 2478 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Castle of Clear Tower - Parma

by Roberto M Parma
45 comments, 2814 views

HI RES 34.3 MP

Autumn Leaves and Alleyway

by Dramtastic
38 comments, 1741 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Sigma » Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport