|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Cusufai www.juzaphoto.com/p/Cusufai  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z50 II Pros: reasonable price in kit with the small 16-50; AUTOFOCUS with more effective subject recognition, not infallible of course, even in situations where the D500 went into crisis. Ergonomically I feel good but this is a personal aspect. Cons: Battery charge indicator with no remaining capacity but with the 3 ... on the last, red induces "anxiety" because if you change it immediately the overall duration becomes ridiculous while if you don't change it you risk turning off at an inopportune time. The battery life is extremely shorter than the reflex; I took 3 (EN-EL25A) more than the one equipped. I recently purchased the original MH-32 charger and this seems to have improved the life a bit. No charger in the purchase box. VIEWFINDER DISPLAY DELAY It is not a camera devoted to dynamic scenes due to the delay with which the image appears in the viewfinder which increases framing and composition errors during bursts with "narrow" subject (open discussion here: https://www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=5085804) ROLLING SHUTTER the reading time of the sensor is high and this implies the visibility of the consequent deformations; In silent mode (electronic viewfinder) this phenomenon is evident. BURST The fastest is H continuous extended but the photo taken is displayed in the viewfinder so following correctly (e.g.) a fast flight becomes almost impossible. In H mode, things improve but the delay on the viewfinder remains, which increases the inaccurate results. PLEASURE OF OBSERVATION Compared to the optical viewfinder, the naturalness of light and colors in the most beautiful moments is completely lost ... but since what matters is the result, it is an aspect that is all in all not critical. Opinion: Taken in February 2025 and used quite thoroughly for birdlife in different situations, first with FTZII with 200 500 and then with 180 600. For non-nature photos (walks, tourism etc.) at the moment I continue to use the D7200 with the 16-80 which I find more pleasant than observing the scene thanks to the optical viewfinder. I was right to take it so that I get used to ML technology which has advantages but also, at least in the price/technology range of the Z50II, negative implications. The number of photos lost due to framing errors is compensated by the greater number of photos "hooked" by the AF in complicated background situations; I find this aspect the strong point of this little one. I await without haste the heir Z90 or Z500 which will be ... if it will be! .. I hope it has adequate technology that makes the limitations found negligible or absent. Overall, the effectiveness in use is also there thanks to the 180 600 more manageable as a zoom than the 200-500. sent on July 20, 2025 |
 | Nikon D7200 Pros: 24 Mpixel APS-C sensor (6000x4000 pixels), dual SD slots, efficient AF, battery life, ergonomics, dual ring controls, size, compatibility with non-motorized AF lenses, Cons: For my use I don't detect them obviously except for the lower speed and responsiveness compared to the D500 and the fact that I don't use and therefore I don't need the adjustable screen; For the noise I never found it unmanageable even here considering that I never climb above 1600. Opinion: Waiting for the "D400" that didn't come out, I decided to buy a first D7200 by reselling a D300s. Satisfied with the D7200 I still returned it to get the D500. To have a forklift available I bought another used D7200 at a price and in unmissable condition. I still use it currently for macro outputs or when I know I have to use the angle viewfinder for "floor" sessions; the rectangular bayonet coupling is in fact faster and more practical for me than the circular screw one, which I have on the D500. The pixel size is 3.9 micrometers for a 24 Mpixel APS-C sensor which allows for a nice cropping margin for recomposition. The dimensions and weight (765 g) are reflex but still a little lighter and smaller than the d500 and the previous D300s. In conclusion, I still recommend it to those who want a good reflex at a reasonable price and, the one I have, I keep it carefully, using it often as mentioned above. sent on December 16, 2023 |
 | Panasonic Lumix TZ100 / ZS100 Pros: Pocket-sized, good focal range, brightness, build quality, effective touch for focus at the favorite point of the scene, availability of the EVF. Cons: Non-articulated Display, codec unavailability for raw file previews (RW2) on PC (W7), charger not included in the purchase box. Opinion: I bought this camera to not carry the weight and the clutter of the reflex during the Pilgrim's Way; I am very satisfied with it while using it for a very small percentage of its possibilities (e.g. I do not do video). I put it in the backpack often even when I go out with the camera and tele. I had compared it with the Sony RX100, the Canon G7 MII (of which I liked the articulated display) but in the end I chose this (I did not want to give up the touch that Sony did not have and for the greater focal excursion than the canon). To charge the battery by pulling it out of the camera I bought a Patona charger that works very well; But definitely a cons. I could not find the codec for previews from PC W7 of RW2... for the quick view of the raw images then use FastStone (Fsviewer). The quantity and arrangement of the keys requires you to use it often to take your hand; If you do not use it for a while regain the options and how to change some settings is not really easy but I think this necessarily accommon the compact for a matter of physicality. Ultimately if you have requirements of lightness and good compactness I feel I can recommend. sent on July 29, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR Pros: Value, autofocus, image stabilization, usable with TC 1.4, balanced in the pan Cons: Nothing "fatal" however: ready case, lens hood graft helical excursion to go from maximum to minimum focal length or vice versa, not weather sealed Opinion: Start right away by declaring that they are satisfied with this aim that I'm using with my camera D7200.rnrnLa positive perception is based on past experience with other lenses and therefore should not be considered absolute ovviamente.rnrnHo had 300 afs F4 I used multiplied on NIKON D300s and then the 150,600 tamron; only the latter also used on NIKON D7200.rnrnGiudico this the best lens Tamron constructively as AF speed and, as a project, with a good value (6 meters) of the AF range limiter (that the Tamron was 15 meters ) .rnL'AF is extremely quiet; not the feeling of extreme reactivity but in essence it is rather quick and preciso.rnrnRispetto to 300 AFS F4 with TC 1.7 This zoom is, in my opinion, better as AF speed and accuracy while compared to 300 with TC 1.4'd say speed and precision are equivalgono.rnrnLa zoom versatility is obviously the reason why I bought so unlike "infinite" thanl fixed. The 200 500 multiplied (I have the TC 1.4 II) amazed me that still allows for usability and clarity that I got in a few shots (I'm here on Juza) ... close subjects in good light and it must be said. . then ottimali.rnrnQuanto conditions of my positive experience depends on the lens and how much by the best AF control of the camera body does not know dire.rnrnLo use as I have always done with my lenses stopping down, in light conditions that allow it, at least one stop (to F8 then) compared to the maximum opening that is F5,6.rnrnPer use the zoom going true low as focal (is the situation where the subject approaches in flight for example) should be challenged in a special way otherwise you can not "start all over"; the possibility of using it in a "pump" would have been nice but it is not (at least for me) a question irrinunciabile.rnrnIn two occasions, in contrast with support and with vegetation, I dropped the hood; then the block of Inscion of the lens hood is not the best but you just get us some definitive attenzione.rnrnrnIn are really happy with the purchase and if you need this type of zoom range I would recommend it even in relation to cost. sent on June 02, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 300mm f/4 D ED Pros: Constructive and optical quality, modular MAF distance with limiter over 2 intervals (from 1.45 m or from 3 m to infinity), AF speed (in the limited range of 3m), brandability, transportability thanks to the built-in lampshade, sustainable weight for freehand photos/excursions, not excessive price, maintenance of value, resaleability. Cons: I mention the question of the poorly designed bracket more because it notices that because I verified Opinion: My opinion is expressed in the pros I have indicated and it is very very positive. If anything, in the implicit characteristics of the lens (fixed fire and F4) are the possible considerations on whether or not to adopt this objective: at the moment I would confirm the purchase by not existing in the NIKON house a viable alternative in the price range that I consider; for example, there is no 400 or a zoom (always in the price for me affordable) that have won the enthusiasm of those who have adopted them (it is easy to compare with the excellent 400 5.6 and the versatile 100-400 of THE CANON that are instead widely used). As for the diaphragm a 2.8 would certainly be desirable but the doubts about the price going up, with the quality but also with the weight, and the branding that would decrease have at the moment kept me away from this replacement. So Nikon AF-S 300mm f/4 D ED, Nikon TC-14E II, Nikon TC-17E II, with customary use of the pairing 300 th TC1.7 (diaphmmndo in general to F8) the kit that I use, mostly with satisfaction, during my outings. sent on November 05, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
