JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews
Lenses
Lenses Nikon
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR

The Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR is a supertele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2015. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1399 €;

157 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Specifications
Focal lenght	200-500 mm
Angle of view	12.4 - 5°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/5.6
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	19 elements in 12 groups
Min. focus distance	2.20 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.22x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	95 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	2300 g
Dimensions	108 x 268 mm
Buy
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Roberto Olivieri

sent on February 19, 2025

Pros: Fixed focal length 5.6 - sharpness-speed and precision autofocus-weight-price from new competitive and now used you buy well

Cons: Maybe the lens hood a bit plasticky but still nothing serious

Opinion: I was fully satisfied with this perspective...... it was a winning combination with the D500 and gave me satisfaction and joy. Replaced the D500 with the Z6 the problem of the adapter arose but it still continued to behave very well .... the only drawback I found is that in combination with the Kenko 2X the optical stabilizer was, for some reason, in conflict with the Z6 stabilizer which I remedied by disabling the stabilizer on the lens and using only the camera one. For the rest "Gloria et gaudium".

Alba75

sent on August 27, 2024

Pros: Sharpness, autofocus, stabilization, now used you can find it at a good price

Cons: Lens hood, extension

Opinion: I've had it for four months and I've had the opportunity to use it in different situations. Track, car and motorbike, or other outdoor sport. I don't photograph birdlife. In combination with the 850D it is a sniper, fast and does not miss a shot. Good lens hood construction apart from that comes off just looking at it. It extends quite a lot and has a good long loop to reach the maximum focal length. The stabilizer is excellent. Even if heavy I always use it freehand as it is well balanced. Used now it is found at excellent prices and becomes an unmissable deal. Highly recommended.

Buonuomo2000

sent on June 04, 2024

Pros: Sharp, really sharp, used price

Cons: Lacks tropicalization and doesn't focus closely

Opinion: Found used for less than 600 euros, a part of me wanted the 180-600 Z for the internal zoom, but for him I had to spend more than three times as much and on top of that change camera body (I still have the d810), and I thought it wasn't worth it. The most important thing to say: it's really sharp, it gives optical results comparable to my 70-200 f/2.8 vrii, which I didn't expect at all: I've heard from some reviewers that some specimens are sharper than others, well this one really is very sharp, I almost feel guilty for having paid so little for such quality. I almost always use it from f7.1, where I can be sure to get excellent photos even at 500mm, not so much because it disappoints me at f5.6, but rather because in nature photography you can't ask a wolf to go back if the first shot turned out badly, so better be on the safe side. Now the cons: 1) the problem of humidity is really there: being telescopic, if it rains on top of the barrel while the lens is extended, the water enters inside the lens when it retracts. My specimen had a bit of condensation when I bought it, and I had to send it in for service to have it removed, to prevent it from becoming moldy. It was a calculated choice because, starting from the very low purchase price, the total expense was about 700 to have the lens refurbished, but I will have to be careful not to use it in the rain. As for you, if you buy it used, be careful, and above all consider that the internal zoom of the new 180-600 is the most important difference between these two lenses, such as to justify the purchase with the same optical quality, if you already use a Z camera. The build quality in general is also not on par with premium lenses, here there is plastic instead of metal; The 70-200 I feel it could fall on the floor and work the same, this one doesn't. 2) the good news is that it can take really good photos on subjects close to the limits of macro, such as butterflies and flowers [I expected that for close things I would have to change lenses, but I didn't]; The bad news is that it doesn't know how to focus well, it seems that the autofocus has been calibrated to search for distant subjects, and for close things you will have to pistol with the manual one. Final grade 8.5/10, they are very good lenses put inside a fragile and non-tropicalized body. It's the compromise to choose if you don't want/can spend 2K for a 180-600.

Marcello Caloro

sent on February 23, 2024

Pros: Price, stabilization, image quality.

Cons: Weight, some inaccuracies on AF.

Opinion: I've been using it for camera hunting, mounted on a D.7500, for almost two years. The color rendering is excellent, the AF is very fast, the VR is amazing. Impeccable quality with apertures from 7.1 upwards, better to avoid 5.6. In good light conditions it gives its best. The weight recommends using it with a solid monopod. In short, a good goal.

Lupaccio58

sent on March 19, 2023

Pros: Excellent VR, excellent sharpness, price, maximum constant aperture on all focal lengths

Cons: engineering, tripod mount foot

Opinion: I arrive good last to have my say on this lens that, thanks to the decidedly very low price, has had a huge success and has brought many fans closer to the world of long fires. You immediately appreciate the extremely efficient VR (shooting at 1/125 is to be considered a standard), a pleasant brilliance of colors and excellent sharpness. It is a lens with the right weight for that range of focal lengths but this weight is poorly distributed, passing from 200 to 500 the lens lengthens and not a little making everything not very harmonious and above all not very stable. And again, the zoom ring - although very precise - is too demultiplied and this makes it slow, you have to turn a lot to go from minimum to maximum focal length. Personally I have equipped my zoommon with neoprene cover (solid color or camouflage does the same, the important thing is to protect it), a 95 Sigma Protector filter (excellent both mechanically and optically even if extremely expensive), an excellent carrying case (Nikon provides an indecent bag equal to that of the fifty, only longer. On Amazon you will find an excellent JJC Lens at 22 euros, in case contact me and send you the link) and above all to collar with Arca Swiss attack (a nice aluminum iShoot collar always taken on Amazon, 52 euros and pass the fear!). Yes, because Nikon still provides the foot with the anachronistic old attack that no one uses anymore. I forgot, the hood is really light and I proceeded to cover it internally with black velvet adhesive paper. Put on in this way, the 200-500 becomes extremely competitive and attractive while maintaining an absolutely unapproachable value for money. Of course, the 500 PF is even sharper and swings freehand in a much better way but... It costs almost three times as much and doesn't have the versatility of a zoom! And finally let's talk about the dilemma that always haunts those who think of this lens: excluding a priori the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary which is nothing special, is it better the Nikon 200-500 or the Sigma 150-600 Sport? So let's say once and for all that the Nikon is very very good but that the Sport is a little better on all focal lengths. The problem is that the Sport can only be used on a tripod (and of course with a nice Gimbal head) while with the Nikon - if you are robust - some hand shots you can do it. So in the shed or in any case fixed position the Sport, for everything else the Nikon, especially if coupled with the superlative D500. Then, of course, do as you please...

There are 46 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR

.......

by Pumabg
89 comments, 31554 views [editors pick]

.....

by Pumabg
103 comments, 24094 views [editors pick]

Morning meetings

by Marcophotographer
191 comments, 15544 views [editors pick]

HI RES 7.9 MP

First floor....

by Roberto Becucci
116 comments, 30958 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

Flight

by Romma69
102 comments, 8273 views [editors pick]

HI RES 9.8 MP

Pampering

by Marcophotographer
112 comments, 9707 views [editors pick]

Civetta Capogrosso

by Mauro Arzillo
118 comments, 16048 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

.......

by Pumabg
70 comments, 19785 views

Untitled Photo

by Manojodungat
86 comments, 18897 views

HI RES 8.1 MP

Dawn Dating

by Marcophotographer
99 comments, 9635 views [editors pick]

The elegance of the deer

by Marcophotographer
97 comments, 10412 views

HI RES 8.4 MP

A sun ... shy

by Maryas
237 comments, 10853 views

HI RES 7.1 MP

Catch me if you can! - Martin Common Fisherman

by Alessandro Belloni
88 comments, 11911 views [editors pick]

Untitled Photo

by Grzehoofr
56 comments, 10604 views [editors pick]

Camels

by Antonio Paesanti
75 comments, 4222 views [editors pick]

HI RES 15.3 MP

Jackal

by Banjo911
144 comments, 11928 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

Common shelduck

by Francesco Sartori
65 comments, 4855 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

Man on the moon

by MarcoBen155
76 comments, 15306 views

......

by Pumabg
46 comments, 11086 views [editors pick]

Cuculus canorus

by Prajzner_lukasz
46 comments, 5031 views [editors pick]

HI RES 11.2 MP

.......

by Pumabg
63 comments, 14598 views

.......

by Pumabg
51 comments, 10209 views

THE LAST CRAVING

by Marcophotographer
73 comments, 6587 views

At dawn

by Marcophotographer
74 comments, 5334 views [editors pick]

Under the first flakes

by Maryas
170 comments, 6177 views

HI RES 6.1 MP

...

by Pumabg
38 comments, 15170 views

......

by Pumabg
52 comments, 7032 views

Coccothraustes coccothraustes

by Axel73
50 comments, 2651 views [editors pick]

HI RES 34.1 MP

Untitled Photo

by Red1
71 comments, 6890 views

HI RES 12.5 MP

The first lights

by Marcophotographer
65 comments, 6829 views

HI RES 5.1 MP

Untitled Photo

by Manojodungat
49 comments, 10924 views

A great Good morning

by Marcophotographer
78 comments, 5956 views

HI RES 8.3 MP

Scent of spring

by Maryas
169 comments, 5950 views

HI RES 5.2 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Crane flight

by Maryas
152 comments, 6810 views

HI RES 5.3 MP

To all beer!

by Maryas
175 comments, 9050 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The vispa upupetta that ate among the grass

by Maryas
137 comments, 5857 views

HI RES 8.9 MP

Untitled Photo

by 1niko
111 comments, 7992 views

HI RES 4.2 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Nikon » Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR