|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nunziozo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nunziozo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Price (!!!), stabilization, sharpness, contrast, blur, building Cons: Weight and size, ring absence tripods Opinion: Bought with the Sigma 10-20mm about a month and a half ago, this goal I fully exploited only in my last trip to London. rnSi proved a lens truly sublime, the sharpness is superb at all focal lengths, as blurry (we talk about use of APS-C, let alone on FF!). The stabilizer is a godsend, especially when shooting at the maximum focal length, and is very good at his job. rnPagato just under 300 €, I was afraid that there was in a trap, but it proved a really smart buy track, showing the excellent voices on build quality and image: quality / price ratio 10 + .rnSe really want to find fault, I I quote the following dimensions: I agree with those who called the hood "of exhibitionist", because it is almost as long as the lens and makes it bulky and awkward, especially in crowded places. The weight is felt very, using this lens on a Canon 550D, and could have used the presence of a ring Treppiedi. sent on August 29, 2015 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Pros: Sharpness, construction, AF, quality / price ratio, standard equipment Cons: Dark, soft edges, sensitive wheel, front cap Opinion: I have the Sigma for about a month and a half, so my review is leaving things as they are. Used a lot in my last trip to London, I was more than satisfied: it is a good ergonomics, apparently plasticky but is very robust, between f / 8 and f / 16 the sharpness is scary (but still soft at the edges) and the ' AF is always quick and precissisimo. Not to mention the fact that Sigma offers in the package hood and drawstring bag, although not a top of the line (learning, Canon mom!). RnDi against talk of a target dark enough, seen running from f / 4, but d ' Besides, about 300 € you can not expect much. Another flaw is the focal ring that is a bit 'too sensitive, just touch it and it all goes bust, but everything is resolved with a bit' of foresight and patience. The front cap is not very good, it difficult to engage especially with the lens hood attached, and you live with the constant risk of perderlo.rnAC, vignetting and distortionoverall acceptable, and even if it is correct to perfection with profiles Lightroom. To have a little 'flare you must desire strongly, because the files are almost always quite clean, despite taking in controluce.rnSarà I've been very lucky, but my copy is almost perfect. Quality / price ratio outstanding. sent on August 29, 2015 |
 | Canon 550D Pros: Excellent for use amateur Cons: Low resistance to noise Opinion: C "Landscape", etc.). Alternatively you quietly a minimum of PP.rnrnEssendo, then, a machine "dated", the 550D loses today the comparison with the other cameras and amateur, that in terms of functionality are perhaps higher, in particular for the presence of spherical display, touch screen, HDR-on-camera, ecc.rnA level of image quality, however, at least on paper the 550D is still a competitive car, at least in respect of the bigger range XXXD (even DxOMark believes the yield sensor 550D higher than the 700D: http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-700D-versus-Canon-EOS-550D___870_645).rnrnIn Finally, once you're comfortable with the settings, and combined with the right optics, the Canon 550D is a great gem, ideal if you approach it for the first time in the world of digital SLR cameras. Personally I have always appreciated and, although I are attempting bodies decidedly higher performance as the 7DmkII and 6D, I think I keep it with me again for a while ', downgradingthe maximum to the second machine body. sent on December 26, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
