|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ireland77 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ireland77  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: sharpness, stabilizer, construction quality, price Cons: if we want to be picky the focus speed Opinion: After a few years I decided to return on a canvas and I must say this tamron compared to the big brother canon has nothing to invidiare.rnL'unica flaw is its slowness in focus with the function to serve but to no static photos problema.rnLo stabilizer instead is something exceptional, besides the fact that you do not hear anything at all (like the canon f2 is 35), I can take sharp freehand photo with 1/30 times .... precise immediately that although being a lover of photography are not known for my steady hand ... rnAltra satisfaction I got it looking at the test results of dxo where my canon 6d with Tamron overall scores one point in more 'than the canon second series! rn sent on May 31, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM Pros: Clarity, weight, noise and speed of focus Cons: no hood Opinion: I bought a little over a month this point is to gradually blend into the world of portrait (shot mostly landscapes) and to take it with me to the mountains in those days of low light or rainy where a wide angle is not strictly necessary. Also it states that it is the first time you purchase a fixed lens and I must say that after the first exit I had a good impression. Its light weight and speed of focus are at the top for me and also to f2 creates a blurred very pleasant. This Sunday I went out with the fog and even in the woods could shoot at ISO 800 and f4, the photos that I got I like a lot. I chose this over the more quoted Article 35 of sigma simply for weight and size, and at the moment I do not regret absolutely as with portraits settled, for my little experience, it performs very well and has nothing to envy to the sigma. Landscapes close is fantastic, generates saturated color and sharpness is excellent ... coupled with 6d complete success! RnVoto 9.5 just because nL is on and does not have the lens hood. sent on May 05, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Weight-sharpness-distortion-stabilizer Cons: Quality accessories and aesthetics Opinion: ... I tried to hold out as long as possible but the cash back promo winter has cheated me and so I have been shopping together at Christmas ... 24-70 f4 .... what about ... the spectacular optical exceptional performance as noted by many of us .... rnUnica negative note found on both goals is the significant loss of quality by canon ... I'll explain ... owned the 24-105 and aesthetic differences that I immediately noticed are primarily the quality of the plastic used for the hood, in the 24-105 was solid to the touch while in this already feels that the plastic is poor, depending on what the red line feature of the L series in this seems like painted while in the 24-105 was just an o-ring red ... also the rubber ring seems too soft and the idea that over time sfaldi.rnDulcis not least the front cap once distinguished the L series with the written canon ultrasonic while now indicates only the written canon and even that still consists of a plastic very fragile.rnSono only subtleties that certainly does not take away any quality the yeand; Optical But for a number L, where we all know that it takes several cards from 100 to buy it, I expected at least that these details remain unchanged ... rnih any case recommend it to anyone ... sent on December 23, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
