|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Andrea.disorte www.juzaphoto.com/p/Andrea.disorte  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Google Pixel 2 XL Pros: construction, originality, interaction with google account, photographic quality Cons: toning on the blue screen, screen colors, side keys. Opinion: Finally I review the google Pixel 2 XL, much desired and finally tested.rnHe won the competition with competitors Note 8 and Mate Pro 10. The reason is not dictated by the technical characteristics but more by a brand factor. Beautiful aesthetically, excellent in software and perfect in photography. Excels in battery life that is not little.rnThe choice has fully satisfied me, aware of the flaws that I knew to find and here I list: rnThe screen is a step below the top range competitors: little vividness and above all a heavy color change of white blue at the slightest inclination. I read about a production problem of the first models, while the phones produced after, since December 2017, do not seem to suffer from the problem. But not being able to turn on the phone before buying it becomes all a factor of luck. rnBe the defects, put the side buttons to the right. They are quite uncomfortable, I do not understand the choice to leave the left side "smooth" .rnInteressante instead of the button "squeeze" so literally squeezing the phone leaves theGoogle assistant. Beautiful found.rnThe rear camera is spectacular. Not so much for technical features, but the Google software that processes it is monstrous, beats all other cameras.rnBattery with optimal duration. rnrnIn the complex, a really cool phone. I'm happy with the choice. My judgment is 8, because the problem of the screen is not acceptable for a phone at the threshold of € 1000. sent on January 18, 2018 |
 | Samsung NX300 Pros: Portability, high ISO performance, tilting screen menu ease, night photos, grip Cons: Samsung, optical (few), long exposures. Opinion: It's a Samsung, and this is the first defect. And it's a shame because this series of NX were the really high-quality compact. very good picture of the spectacular quality sensor. Easy handling of the toy car. The tilting screen is really very useful I have tried in all possible conditions and has never let me down. rnTutte the photos I've taken with the 16 and found a real coupled to valore.rnRipeto the only flaw is that Samsung has decided to stop here. sent on January 17, 2017 |
 | Sony NEX 5 Pros: Portability, b / n, tilting zchermo, construction, sensor Cons: Command buttons, not so much tilting screen, Opinion: Overall I can only give a positive opinion on the machine. I give a judgment as a machine intended as second body, so it is a judgment on the use that I made it. Interesting was the performance black and white, a real surprise, pleasant in the right gray in harsh tones. I appreciated the tilting screen that I put however also among the negative things because it does not have a great handling. I also tried some long exposure and the car did not behave badly. rnComunque did not fire the feeling and so after a few weeks I decided to change. I still prefer the Samsung NX 300, especially for the performance at high ISO and for night photos. sent on January 17, 2017 |
 | Fujifilm X-M1 Pros: compact, manegevole, significant on high ISO, folding screen Cons: lack viewfinder af Opinion: Let's say it was for months on my second body coupled to the x-t1. I have never regretted having used, he has always given me great soddifazioni. I used it a lot for landscapes and has often been troubled by long exposures but there was never a time that not behaved worthily. Obviously the lack of viewfinder makes me look like a toy, but it is not. I appreciate the shape and manageability, reclining screen and the estate of the iso. I would not go above 800 but 1600 is not really evil. sent on October 22, 2016 |
 | Sigma DP1 Merrill Pros: sensor, megapixel (in some cases), compactness, great in cases of good light Cons: ergonomic, plastic, megapixel (in some cases), f slow, not performance at low light Opinion: Someone called it a black box with a sensor inside. Perfect description. The Foveon is something exceptional, the file produced pretty good, that rivals the best SLR. I use it for long exposures, with a good filter can hold up to 9.8 seconds of opening (not more you can go). rnInadatta for portraits in low light as photos street, its slowness AF is embarrassing in some places. But for landscape photos it is really excellent. rnInsomma is a machine that is used to some things and avoided by others. rnIo me I hold tight! sent on December 11, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm X-T1 Pros: , Size, weight, nuts, iso, objectives Cons: af, smaller dynamic range SLR, flare Opinion: It 'was the camera with which I learned to shoot. It 'nice to the touch, the eye, and is even more beautiful photograph us. love at first sight. It 'a mirrorless, perhaps the best and as such it has the best AF and the dynamic range and the flare is not the massimo.rnPerò objectives XF Fuji offer a real car professionale.rnBellissimi the jpeg, perhaps the best in the market. Excellent B / N.rn sent on December 07, 2015 |
 | Nikon D5200 Pros: ergonomic tilt monitor, sensor Cons: Battery life, AF Opinion: Meanwhile, let's say that it depends very use, may be the best entry-level as it can be a mediocre Nikon. It depends on how you approach. For me it was the second Nikon after 3100 and I must say that the jump there was, but there was little. The tilting monitor that initially may be silly, is then essential. The f is below average, but what is claimed ... rnHa a great sensor. For me it is a great camera to take away on a trip and to make the street. Less suitable to rest. Excellent entry level sent on December 07, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR Pros: solidity, clarity, build quality, utilization Cons: all of which are essential flaws: weight, distortion at 16mm. The hood obscene: D Opinion: A lens that is the must of Fujifilm, a lens that attaches to the room and did not come off. Landscape, portrait and street. Everything can be done very well with this objective that has a fixed aperture 2.8 that can be useful in many occasioni.rnLe blades produce a beautiful star already f20. rnInutile that we complain of weight, can not do better for a purpose so good, if you look for more lightness is 18-55 from the kit that is cmq excellent. rn sent on December 04, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XF 14mm f/2.8 R Pros: sharpness, size, luminosity, composition Cons: ring slow hood of a plasticaccia, lens cover very bad Opinion: It is mounted on the camera body and not disassembling more. Very bright, great sharpness, ideal for landscapes but also portraits, I would have made some kind of project. RNE 'really necessary for landscapers Fuji. A treat. rnAnche the price (about 900 I think) is very good and worth the investment. sent on July 03, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
