The Nikon D5200 is a reflex camera with APS-C (1.5x) sensor and 24.1 megapixels manufactured from 2012 to 2013 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 25600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 5 FPS. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 549 €;
59 users have given it an average vote of 8.8 out of 10
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 182000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:24m pixels on sensor 18x24mm. Accept any lens with Fmount attack in M ??mode. Never had dirt on the sensor.
Cons:Small handle for medium and large hands. Not high autonomy. There is no basic function.
Opinion:Fine detail resolution overcomes all other nikon including 36mega full frame pixels. Counting on the hand there is little to say about this point. A full frame should have nearly 50m pixel to have the same detail. Conversely, it forces you to not shoot at bigger than 400iso, otherwise noise makes the fine detail useless. Despite that I used it very well at night and flanked on a telescope with good results at low ISO long minutes always win although this requires more laborious placements like Bigourdan. The sensor never broke me despite endless gear changes (almost fixed focal lengths) and nighttime hours with the open sensor with mirror telescopes. Not very good battery, one battery can be enough to discharge, in other cases two or even three depending on the use. The handle is very small and with a firm grip almost certainly presses the cross cursor involuntarily. Accept lenses even in the Q series and at least in M ??allows you to use some good old optics. RiguardOr settings unfortunately lack fast-timing sincroflash, and some m-up type functions to separate the mirror motion from the shutter. A thumbnail preview would be appreciated. The telescope orientable display is a jolly not just as in other unfavorable positions. I think this is a commercially speaking low-key car that, if well exploited, can give you the best bites at the top of the peak, although unfortunately you must remember that you can not have the flexibility and completeness of other more professional models.
Pros:light, tilting screen, compact, good sensor (for the category), af fast enough
Cons:lack af scooter, not Tropicalized
Opinion:I bought more than a year ago and I used it as birthdays in the summer with 35 degrees in the rain in the cold and I took pictures of all kinds, has never let me pity you can not very well hold the iso ups and qusto for certain types of photos and some places it is a limitation not to little and must sgavignarsela in other ways, the lack of af scooter in some ways it's a shame because using goals a little old that support af but do not have a inside the engine, you must then do everything yourself manually. otherwise it's a very good camera for those who are beginners and want to start with something more than just entry level.
Opinion:It is compact and light, but sturdy. The very rich sensor for an APS-C is really dense, but in-camera noise reduction is effective. In the switch between View-finder and live-view takes a little time, I recommend to use the viewfinder more often to shoot. At high ISO I was really surprised; Despite the very dense sensor the images often have little noise, in raw it snaps quietly up to 3000 ISO. For less than 1000 euros in coupled with the Tamron 16-300 is a treat. Very very good resolution, does not knead like direct competitors (both canon and Sony): In particular Canon has disappointed me from the tests done because despite the less dense sensors there are more problems (!) than with Nikon. Not to mention the distinctly different solidity. I recommend the d5200 because it does not disappoint. If you don't need nonsense like WiFi and GPS is an optimum camera
Pros:Light, cheap, tilting the screen, the sensor seems very good.
Cons:loud snap, manual you are almost forced to take your eye from the viewfinder to the adjustment, the viewfinder does not facilitate the manual focus.
Opinion:I bought this car as the first SLR body driven by an offer that after one year would still tempting, most likely will change it for a d7XXX only for the fact that so I can also use my optical series D autofocus, very comfortable the tilting the screen, if it is used in P or semi-automatic is very practical, and are unable to use quickly, perhaps even setting the ISO on customizable button, manually do a little 'hard work does not pull the eye of the viewfinder, the autonomy of stack enables 400/500 shots always using the screen (checking Patona battery 350/400) mandatory almenoo buy a spare battery, shooting is very noisy and this in my opinion the limits a number of occasions. The viewfinder is very good, but focuse hand is almost impossible without using the indicator light (at least for me that I struggle with the view). The videos are of excellent quality even though it is a bit 'cumbersome use Liveview. Coupled to 18-140 sfadorns pretty pictures. After years of compact camera and bridge (that I literally worn) I was really happy shopping and solidity that gives off this machine, you can use all the optics that I had for the analog is priceless!
Opinion:My first real "camera" purchased more than a year now and I can be quite satisfied with the choice made. I use it in a very amateur way to outings or birthday parties and various occasions so I have not yet made full use of its potential but the impression I have is that it reaches its limit especially indoors soon enough because of low resistance to high ISO, say good up to 1600 over I try not to go, and the lack of internal AF which does not allow the use of all optical. I am still to advise those who want to appear in this wonderful world without fainting and then possibly move on to something more "serious" once you understand what you want from your machine.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.