|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giuseppe Palli www.juzaphoto.com/p/GiuseppePalli  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: Colours, brightness and quality/price Cons: for me no one Opinion: bought it because my canon 17-55 is 2.8 lens was under repair, and it took a long time to get it, needing a similar focal length for a trip I decided on the sigma 17-50 f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM, excellent both as general results of photographs, excellent stabilizer quite fast warm color in shots, Affordable price for such a lens and lighter weight than the Canon 17-55 IS 2.8, although this lens is discontinued and recommended. sent on August 09, 2025 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Solid build sharpness, great stabilizer and price Cons: nothing for me Opinion: I have a Canon 55-250 IS STM lens and I have taken many beautiful photographs, but with this lens bought used for 500 euros many years ago the Canon 70-200 f/4 IS USM is fantastic, for me it is the best lens that Canon has made, perhaps a little bulky it fits just in length in my bag but when you mount it on the camera and start shooting, it arouses envy from other photographers who see the results, from an amateur photographer like me I judge it perfect from every point of view, if you find it even if it is out of production don't think twice, buy it. sent on August 09, 2025 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: Sharpness, fast AF, image stabilization, fixed aperture 2.8 at all focal lengths Cons: Missing the lens hood that it should be included with that price, the rest for me no Opinion: I think that the friends who are interested in this lens they want to hear the strange thoughts of those who use it, here is mine. Bought used for 500 Euros, mounted on canon 70d and fantastic, I use it from ca. a year, I did not see razor-sharp photographs of dust on lente.rnIl 17-55mm then real for Canon are 27.2 mm and 88 mm and a truly suitable lens to do everything. I'm not a profesional and I will not discuss the vignetting and distortion, which Sonoe almost imperceptible, important and with this aim I made bellisime photos in all lighting conditions. For me only flaw and photographing down by tilting the lens, it moves down, but heard by all and a normal thing of this goal. The construction and well made and the weight does not feel. In a few words and a lens which will give you a lot of satisfaction, you will keep always mounted on your reflex, I do not think you could find something better, to me highly recommended. 9.5 rating. sent on October 18, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Pros: Sharpness and stabilization ottima.Molto lightweight, excellent quality price, with little money you have a telephoto 400mm. Cons: Nothing compared to the price and great quality Opinion: Recently I purchased a Canon EOS 70 d with the kit lens 18-55 3.5 / 5.6 is stm. I must say I was thrilled to quest'obbiettivo.Foto crisp, with a specific emphasis of color and detail. Given the full satisfaction of 18-55, to cover all focal I decided to buy the paintings 55-250 f4 / 5.6 is stm, Soon the first pictures I noticed sharpness of details and colors fantastici.Autofocus quiet, pretty fast, good focus and good stabilizer. I do not know the other goals of the L series, but for what it costs and an exceptional lens that mounted on the 70 d by excellent performance with very little money you can really have fun. For me consigliatissimo sent on January 21, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
