|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Antonio C. www.juzaphoto.com/p/Antonio_C.  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Coolpix P1000 Pros: Hallucinatory fun; dizzying zoom; stabilizer; functionality; 4k; camera born for the Moon. Cons: Noise also iso 100; quality of image (by force of things); resistance on easel to maximum extension Opinion: The P1000 has a scary stabilizer. Consider that, usually, even the soul trembles beyond 300/400 mm. Until now, the most powerful stabilizer ever tested was mounted on the Tamron 70-300 VC USD. The corresponding Canon 70-300 IS II USM also goes strong, but on 3,000 mm the easel is not enough even if there is a slight breeze. For me, the P1000 stabilizer is promoted. As for the quality of the image, with a sensor of 2/3 what do you want, the Moon? Well, in fact it's made especially for the Moon ? Who's used to sensors and reflex glasses, can't think of loving the image quality produced by such a tiny sensor. But compromises are compromised. Also in reference to the P1000, I would recommend it to those who love to observe animals in their daily lives without the possibility of disturbing them, to those who like to observe the Moon and the Sun (with special darkening filter) and to those who want to dabble to observe Jupiter, Saturn, Antares and beautiful company. In the future, I reserve the right to try the superzoom 24-600 with 1 inch sensor, the quality definitely rises, even with a couple of hundred more iso than the P1000 that must, categorically, remain anchored to the 100. sent on April 30, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Frightening sharpness, microcontrast, ruggedness, colors, stabilizer, AF Cons: Nobody Opinion: An incredible lens. I switched to full frame, to the 5d Mark IV for accuracy, and I couldn't not buy the best wide angle in circulation. Too bad it's F/4, but honestly I don't make a big use of the 2.8, except for a couple of Milky way that I shoot during the year. It has a contrast, some colors, a definition that is something unique. I can only recommend it. sent on June 03, 2018 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II Pros: construction (it is beautiful), incredible sharpness, maf "easy", vignetting nonexistent Cons: flare .... I only flare Opinion: finally this is my goal. building good, is aesthetically beautiful, the maf is particular to switch to af mf and vice versa must push above and below the ring :) rndevo say that confirmed the expectations, especially as to the sharpness, I'm very satisfying. vignettattura almost nonexistent, even many times I create in post. often there are chromatic aberrations, but are easily solved in post popping a simple box. distortion at 11mm obvious, but then it is a fisheye. Slightly less sharp at all apertura.rnUnico neo, alas, is the flare. Oh God, is not always present, but when present will ruin the shot. many times just the lens hood (among other things beautiful, lined on the inside), and sometimes not even that, but this does not change my opinion on this goal, ULTRApositivo opinion, absolutely recommended, also saw how much I paid (355euro ) .rn9 full :) sent on December 05, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: stabilizer deadly sharpness at certain focal Cons: excessive weight and bulk Opinion: I mount the Tamron SP 70-300mm f / 4-5.6 Di VC USD for EOS 600D with the crop factor so the focus is even more thrust. The first thing you notice is the size on the one hand is an advantage because it gives security, but on the other hand is a little too bulky necessarily need a backpack, simple bags are not enough. the hood is huge. the stabilizer is amazing, one of the best on the market, frozen image !!! f good and not too noisy. excellent sharpness, but lost a little over 250mm. brightness "typical" of a canvas. great for amateurs, unbeatable price. I recommend it sent on November 21, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: decent sharpness, construction, zoom lock switch Cons: lack of stabilization, soft at room temperature, not Full Time MF, AF inaccurate and slow Opinion: I use it on 600D. I expected a lot more clarity to this lens which, however, at least to me, is quite sharper than the 18-55 kit. however, the sharpest reached between the f4 and f7 / 9. at f2.8 is too soft. great lens also to do some portrait, gives a blurred discreto.qualche little problem with the AF, a bit slow and hard to focus in certain special circumstances. I recommend it given the excellent value for money sent on November 20, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
