|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mactwin www.juzaphoto.com/p/Mactwin  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D3s Pros: The current queen of the high iso. Impeccable construction (maybe the cover CF deserves a little more). Excellent viewfinder, not equal to 1D3s but great. Great customization (Typical nikon), some nothing short of brilliant quality of the file as a reference (the low density of the sensor allows a lot). Ability to manage the crop in the car (typical nikon FF) Excellent skills in tracking AF despite the few cross-type points (no side) 3D Matrix (equivalent expansion in all points of canon) very efficient, you do not use often but on nikon works as expected. White balance is not perfect but better than canon The shot is very nice, clean and precise noise, no effect "spring", low lag, among the best. Recovery in the shadows of the d3x but not at the level higher than most of the devices on the market. Dual slot CF (CF the best of the SD of the series1). Viewfinder Magnification at> 100% (if you want with a single press) .. nikon. Cons: Heavier than the competition. Does not support 50 iso. Lack of cross-type side. Low capacity coupling in one-shot (single) with little light and contrast .. better to use continuous fire. AF module up to 5.6 (the canon f / 8) Ability to customize the files on separate cards less than canon (you can not set raw-mraw) Cost resolution than the Canon a bit 'too low in some situations, the crop 1.5 gives output slightly too low for professional use. Yield of jpeg files much lower to that obtained with processing Raw, in this canon does better. The handle fatigues a bit 'compared to other machines. The ring on the index (Typical nikon) is the least you could ergonomic design. The engagement of the Nikon bayonet is psychopaths, and reverse pitch engagement point is not understandable as in canon. Opinion: The D3s is one of the best cameras ever made, but lacking some features useful in the workplace is one of the sports equipment more available on the market. Of course, the perfect world does not exist and there will always be the most beautiful things or profits from one side or the other but there is little to say about the fact that Nikon has produced a device that with little attentions almost reach perfection (misnomer a technological environment that undergoes continuous evolution). It would be nice to be able to mount many types of optics as in canon (the benefit of the draft), it would be great to have a universal bayonet for all makes and models .... but we live on earth and not in fantasyland. The cost of the machine is high as it is one of the bodies, but I think on the contrary nikon objectives about the bodies is in line with the quality offered over the competition. sent on July 07, 2011 |
 | Canon 1D Mark IV Pros: Typical construction series 1. AF really excellent, a lot of great points to cross estrememanete precise (f/2.8) allow a precision attachment for reference. Gust typical 1D series Fast Excellent operational performance in relation to its iso-density slightly less than the current queen (D3s), but not by much and only detectable after 6400iso. State of the art video capabilities, superior in quality to the 5d2 (but lacks the PDC from full frame) magnification viewfinder is not equal to an APSC but cmq best for the sport, maintaining files and a three-dimensional quality to the smaller size. Ability to take a 50iso. Great resilience in the shadows. File excellent, certainly the best 1600iso onwards. Extensive customization of the machine suitable for use in professional capacity to manage all cross-type points with different lenses f / 4 super telephoto and multiplied capacity in relation to the number and location of points on the cross, unique in the market. The current reference in house Canon Cons: Density of the sensor close to the limit of usability, it would be preferable to a little less resolution. Grana not harmful but visible over a certain number of ISO, the sparsity is less pleasant than that provided by 5D Mark2. The raw file processing requires a greater competition (D3s) acting on the noise reduction in Camera Raw or Lightroom to be able to get a clean file without loss of detail, the file canon "weighs" more obviously. Unable to set the AF point spot on a button on the machine (only on super telephoto buttons). The "expansion to all AF points" (45) is not efficient on the side steps and tends to "drop the subject," much less efficient system matrix nikon. Modula Af extremely efficient in low-light conditions when used in One-Shot, quite poor if Ai-Servo. The trigger is "slightly elastic", the noise and the vibrations are not pleasing sensation like those of a D3s. Opinion: The current reference Canon at home, an animal hunting and sports photography. Considerable improvements compared to the always excellent 1D Mark 3, for both functions (typical of evolutions sw) both in terms of yield iso that af (one for all cross at f / 4). The cost remains high even if in line with the competition. If it had adopted a canon sensor "slightly" less dense than we probably would have had a car as a reference absolute, with a yield iso "probably" equal to the D3s but in addition the ability of ISO 50 and a digital magnification cmq more. Furthermore, the usability was also increased while maintaining an excellent magnification, higher than the past. The advantage of magnification in the viewfinder, and 50iso, the 39-point cross-double-density (2.8), as well as further details of the file in many situations allow you to keep up the excellent D3s, and certainly the offer canon in terms of longer focal lengths allow Canon to maintain a good domain in the sport, but competition runs and the resolution is not the weapon to win. sent on July 07, 2011 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: Probably the most innovative Canon machine, complete with every possible function and well built. Exploited in optimal light (studio) and / or close-up pictures. Great AF tracking (applies only to servo) Lightweight and customizable, excellent viewfinder. Battery with excellent battery life. Affordable. Fair performance at high ISO, higher than previous machines APSC Flash with Master Good video Cons: Sensor bad, one of the worst ever made by canon, too dense, made "real" than sensors with far fewer megapixels. File no detail and sharpness than the resolution (but also in general) with long distance shots. Noise (grain) to any value iso, the file needs a working over. AF too variable in one-shot and click on objects that are not neighbors, is easily confused (AF points are quite large). Tendency to overexpose. Low resilience in the shadows. MRaw file (mjpeg) obviously less defined and detailed downsize made by a computer. Lack of second card (necessary element for professional use). Opinion: If Canon had used a sensor with a lower density and a module af slightly more accurate (especially in one shot) would have been an almost perfect machine. The excessive density makes little usable in all conditions in which a similar machine should offer maximum. The magnification provided by the digital density (not the crop) calls for higher shutter speeds to avoid shake, increasing the shutter speed is clearly leading to demands for more iso consequently to a decrease in detail as they climb . The filter AA of the sensor probably affects of his anyway hardly manage to get files cleaned and etched as on other machines if not with the use of optical state of the art and shots light and optimal times and contrasts well defined, in which case the sensor provides a definition exceptional. Most users heavily influence the Sharpen filter, intervention disreputable that degrades the quality of the photo. One of the best APSC on the market, one of the worst sensors on the market. sent on July 07, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
