|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alegiane78 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Alegiane78  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z5 Pros: Ergonomics*, price quality, customization, ease of use, viewfinder Cons: Ergonomics*, AF in harsh conditions Opinion: I bought it a month ago and I used it on several different occasions, but I wanted to wait to give a complete judgment after last night, when I tested it at a party. I must say that in "normal" conditions it is a camera that absolutely did not make me regret the D750 and everything, after a few days to learn how to put your hands in the right place to set everything (not because it is difficult, but only because there is so much stuff to watch) I took many test shots: holding it in your hands is the most natural thing there can be. Why "Ergonomics" in the voices both for and against? Well, the (green) light for the AF is in a different position from the D750 and so I had to "rethink" the positioning of the left index finger, which obscured it. But switching from an AF mode (C or S) to MF is nonsense and on some occasions I have relied on the manual focus that, with a 35mm, is not even so difficult even in low light, thanks to a fantastic viewfinder, which gives some small problem only in case of total darkness, But even then it offers a legible image. Fully satisfied with the purchase, to have something more I would have had to spend about double, with a Z6II (with the BSI), but obviously we are talking about two different products. PS: for me the video sector is completely superfluous, while the burst at 4.5 fps, when the light is optimal, seems even more performing, so no limitation for my use. sent on February 19, 2023 |
 | Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 Pros: Price/quality, color rendering, blurred progressivity, quick focusing, sharpness Cons: Slight vignetting and distortion, some chromatic aberrations to TA (all easily solved during file development) Opinion: "I study" this lens from well before owning it and I agree with much of what I read and I can say that I chose this product instead of the 35mm f / 1.8 species in relation to quality / price (used as new at 80 € less than the price of Amazon, then, is really a lot of stuff). The hood is not the top, but with a little attention it mounts and disassembles easily (unlike the "big brother" 85mm) and I did not find flare whatsoever; The color rendering is really quality, as I appreciated the gradual and sober blur; The sharpness is also not too aggressive, but it resists for practically the entire image. The slight vignetting (sometimes I don't even notice) and the barrel distortion, are resolved very easily in post, as well as some chromatic aberrations, which I found in some cases at TA, settle painlessly. I must say that I am extremely satisfied with the purchase and recommend it. sent on February 05, 2023 |
 | Panasonic LX10 / LX15 Pros: Dimensions, robustness, ductility, ease of use, integrated flash Cons: Handle, remote control app, battery. Opinion: I have had it for a few weeks, but I got to use it in different and different circumstances. I took it because I wanted a camera to keep in my back pocket during my MTB excursions and, having sorted between different options, based mainly on size and weight, but also on quality and ductility, she arrived. Used socket, but practically new, it was a beautiful discovery and I'm having a lot of fun with it. Obviously the 1" sensor does not offer the same results as the D750 that I have for more "professional" uses and this I expected a bit, but I must say that it is not as bad as you might imagine, so I do not blame it. Unfortunately, partly because I still have to do my hand with it, partly because of the dimensions themselves (not to mention the fact that the viewfinder is missing) it is not always easy to set everything up as I would like at the first moment, but I will work on it and get used to it. For battery life (the display obviously "chubby" charged) I will remedy with a couple of spare batteries, but for the number of shots I take with this camera is not so relevant; The remote control app, on the other hand, may be a bit more responsive, while sometimes you need a restart to be able to shoot from your phone. sent on January 01, 2023 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: RAW File, Solidity, HIGH ISO Estate, Ergonomics Cons: Weight (it was still known), 1/4000, Slow to open the photos taken Opinion: Purchased just before the lockdown, it was several months in the backpack to dust, but then it recovered and I already made over 10 thousand shots. I would say that the switch from APS-C to FF for night shots without flash, for the same ISO, was worth the purchase (used - with 10 thousand shots). The merits and defects are those listed and unlike the previous D5500, which did not have the top display, it sins for two things: the touchscreen and the articulated screen. Weight and size are different obvious issues. However, we were very happy with the purchase. sent on October 04, 2020 |
 | Nikon AF 85mm f/1.8 D Pros: Agile, precise AF, Sharpness, Cheap Cons: With a Full Time MF would have been the top. Some chromatic aberration. Opinion: Taken used at the beginning of summer, I used it for several shots and always gave me great satisfaction. Maybe with little light and not having Full Time MF can be less comfortable in situations of low brightness, because of the elongated laying times and having to retaite the trigger for the new MF, but otherwise I do not think I could have found better, if not spending a lot more money... and it wasn't my goal. sent on October 04, 2020 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 12-24mm f/4 DX II Pros: Size, Weight, Cost, Build Quality and Yield in General Cons: Some flares; chromatic aberration (with filters) Opinion: I took this objective as Tokina's 12-28 seemed to have disappeared from circulation and would be put back on the market at a much higher figure. Satisfied with the result (used for parties, snapshots and street), however, I can not say that the sharpness is the top (used to standards of the 50mm Nikon f/1.8G and the 70/300 Tamron), but it is only noticeable to extreme enlargements; I noticed that flares and especially aberrations, appeared with the use of UV and polarizer, so, trying without, I did not find anything significant and therefore I look good from reusing them (especially in combos). In general, for the expense incurred, I can only consider myself satisfied and I recommend it to everyone who wants to have fun with a good wide-angle entry-level for fans without wanting to force the super-performances from thousands of euros. sent on June 17, 2019 |
 | Nikon SB-500 Pros: Weight, duration beat, simplicity of use, quality-price Cons: I have Not found (for the use I do) Opinion: It is a couple of years that I use it and so far has always been loyal and reliable. Also mounted, does not go to unbalance the machine so much (obvious that the footprint increases) and for those occasions when I found myself using it has always proven safe and reliable. There are Probably also more advanced products, but for sporadic use (although when I use it, usually, I think it's good) I seem to have not mistaken the purchase. I would recommend it, since it seems to me more than an entry-level. sent on April 05, 2019 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Cost, sharpness (when used at the right aperture), autofocus, Lens hood included. Cons: Weight (but it was budgeted), bulky lens hood Opinion: Taken and tried for 3 weeks, I can tell me more than satisfied with the product: I have read technical reviews that have also helped me to better manage the diaphragm (at 300mm f/11 offers excellent sharpness) and already at ISO 200 my D5500 manages to the best loss of bright And I can say that those who complain about the slowness of autofocus do not know what standard is accustomed. That said, the hood is cross and delight: useful and valuable, however it is not functional when it is hooked on the reverse, and prevents the zoom to be used in a functional way. Price and weight, known well before the purchase, are the other two bills, but also on weight, it is not that it is so burdensome. sent on May 26, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Lightness, brightness, sharpness Cons: the diameter is 52mm Opinion: I have the lens from about two months, and during that time I started to use it almost always (18-55 from the kit, I carry it, but it's still in the bag, generally). The thing that surprised me is the inordinate desire to always use it at room temperature, the risk of making a mistake and the picture MAF correct ... but exceeded this initial stage, I would say that I can only speak well. The only flaw (but it is a clear design feature) is that it has a diameter of 58mm, and the various filters that already had 52mm can not be used, but I would say that you can not survive this thing. sent on November 17, 2016 |
 | AmazonBasics - Borsa grande per fotocamera e accessori Pros: VERSATILITY, capacity, price Cons: Some squeaking, but nothing more Opinion: I have it for almost two months and, apart from the famous creaking of hooks, I fully satisfied. I read reviews about people complaining of capacity, but a camera body with lens and other 4 goals (or 3 + flashing light) I would say that we can not expect even more. Also, if you bring two camera bodies, there is still room for a third and fourth lens (or lens and flasher). Space for filters, batteries and materials for lens cleaning. Not to mention that a tripod can be positioned at the bottom of tracolla.rnIl real risk? too heavy starting, as there is in pretty much everything! sent on October 22, 2016 |
 | Nikon D5500 Pros: Light, fast, reliable even at high ISO, ergonomics Cons: Use the display as a second ring is a bit 'complicated Opinion: I've had it a few weeks and I could test it with the kit (18-55) with adapter ring and old Canon lenses (a bit 'at room temperature soft, especially the 50mm) with a 35mm f / 1.8 in the evening at a party without flash. I would say that one can not expect more for the needs I have. The battery, which is quite powerful after the second charging. For the rest, I would say that I just have to wait for the 50mm f / 1.8 and at that point I do not think I will replace longer even a goal. The only flaw, however well compensated by 2 frets are well positioned function, the use of the screen as a second ring, it is impractical and sometimes the nose changed settings ... but you just turn it off and you're done. sent on October 05, 2016 |
 | Nikon Coolpix L830 Pros: Weight, price, zoom (optical), tilting LCD. Cons: Digital zoom, no optical viewfinder, impossible to manually adjust some parameters. Opinion: It 's my first purchase after having "played" a bit' with the reflex of my friends. Of course you have to get used to using the screen instead of the viewfinder and on certain occasions facilitates, in other more complicated (reflection) vita.rnLa the final quality however is very interesting and allows you to use the machine even in "extreme" situations without the photographer must position themselves accordingly (photo from below and above definitely very comfortable) .rnInoltre has a wide range of presets for any type of occasion and environment even for those who do not know too much to juggle with regolazioni.rnOttima in macro and landscapes, perhaps not the best for portraits due to the lack of some adjustments ... but we certainly can not complain, given the great price! sent on August 13, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
