|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Pepesale www.juzaphoto.com/p/Pepesale  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM Pros: all Cons: nothing Opinion: Those who complain about its weight would clearly prefer a 24 70. I'm just saying that I've been working with fixed L 1.2 rf and 1.4 sigma art cameras for years, so I guess you know what I'm talking about. I had tried this zoom quickly on a few occasions and I always snubbed it. Lately the monkey has had the upper hand and thanks to a friend who owns it I was able to do more accurate tests. Surprised by the yield at f2 I decided to buy it. I would like to point out that you can do so much to the point of selling both 35 ii and 28 art. I also put on sale the 40 art keeping the 50 and 85 rf which certainly give as many different satisfactions sent on December 31, 2023 |
 | Canon RF 85mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: AF SHARPNESS BOKEH NO ABERRATION STABILIZATION WITH IBIS BODIES Cons: PRICE Opinion: Given that I have tried for some time this focal length passing over the years respectively from: 85 ef 1.8, 85 ef 1.2 II, RF f2, sigma art 1.4 up to the latter. What can I say..... Apart from the sale of a kidney to finance the purchase, I am happily satisfied. Those portraits at 1.2 with sharpness that seems to be shot at 2.8 are great, plus everything else that rotates at aperture 1.2-----Dream lens.... And don't tell me the owners of EF II that, like the 50 EF 1.2, they are unique lenses and preferable to RF. Had both and the transition to RF is quite another thing. Dare to admit it :) sent on June 17, 2023 |
 | Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro Art Pros: sharpness compactness weight Cons: maybe a bit slow, but less than expected Opinion: Taken new at an acceptable price used on eos R system immediately gave me rande satisfaction, so much so that I immediately sell the 100 Canon L is EF version of course. Compared to f 2.8 the sigma is a span on it and the details are surprisingly sharper. The only thing it suffers from is not being is but the ibis system of the R5 and R6 solve this let's call it a defect. Happily satisfied with the replacement also because the focal length 70 also lends itself in portraiture in a different way to the focal length 100, taking into account that I have the 105 art sent on April 30, 2022 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: all Cons: nothing Opinion: I will add nothing more to what has been said about this sophisticated lens. Only flaw not to have it. Another flaw is addictive.... If you are afraid of weights and measures avoid it.... If you are a portrait lovers do not hesitate. I bought it during the lockdown and got to shoot during this time...... Goodness me...... Considering I had the 135 L, I own 85 ii and 85 rf f2 macro as well as the 100 L, 50 1.2 rf and 70 200 iii But there is no history None of them is comparable sent on June 29, 2021 |
 | Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 HSM Art Pros: sharpening colors distortion build quality Cons: maybe the weight but it's well balanced Opinion: Bought and arrived I immediately did a quick test comparing it to the 14 ii and 24 ii both canon of course, In my possession The first impression is positive Faithfully returns the colors as if it were a sharp canon at 14mm f2.8, a little higher than the 14 ii A 24mm, at 2.8 and 4.0, practically identical to the canon in the center but loses at the edges Considering it is a zoom I would say that it is acceptable It costs less than one of the two and you carry around both of them sent on November 17, 2020 |
 | Canon RF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: sharpness, bokeh, solidity, autofocos Cons: in my opinion nothing Opinion: I'm an admirer of focal 50. On my canons I used all types except the small 1.8 The 50 ef 1.2 accompanied me for many years, I used it a lot.... I didn't go out without, many photos of ceremony in church seemed made with a canvas. He gave me many beautiful photos, but often I was blasphemy for the not precise af, probably also depended on me most of the time. Used at 1.2 rarely for fear of the lack of sharpness that I sometimes found even interesting. However now that I bought LUI shoot at 1.2 is mandatory. It looks like the old ef at 2.8 It's crazy, maybe too sharp not yet being used. I also had the 50 art before the 50 ef but given away out of desperation for the well-known problems. Unfortunately due to the covid all scheduled services have been cancelled and the 50 is there resting:( One last thing: I've been using 50 macros for years, that piece of paid glass used two bucks. I sold it many years ago and then bought it back a year ago. If you have a chance, take one and approach your big brother. You won't regret it.... Indeed!! sent on May 03, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 L II USM Pros: construction; colors; reliability Cons: not having it Opinion: I bought this lens for about six months. It used a virtually new. Only he was missing to complete the park fixed lenses until 135.rnDa when I use it I can not help it much to set aside 35.rnNitido already at 1.4; 2.0 is impressive enough to make us the majority of the shots in various situations in the photography of matrimobnio: house church and esterni.rnBellissimo, I recommend it to all those who can buy it. sent on October 01, 2015 |
 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Good construction sharpness Cons: inconstancy in fire Opinion: bought after one year from the purchase of 35 artrnDa immediately there was empathy as 35rnHo worked with a couple of months getting sometimes excellent results, but in most cases the faulty file into the fire and not only to the entire apertura.rnL'ho sold to a friend who uses it for video and then mf rnLui it is innamorato.rnIo instead I also sold 35 art is passed on to fixed L 50 and 35.rnChe meravigliarnFinalmente snap knowing to take home photography fire and with colors and deadlifts that art did not give me sent on May 29, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
