|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mevill www.juzaphoto.com/p/Mevill  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm GFX50S II Pros: fan ta sti ca Cons: nobody Opinion: it's not a review, I have to work on it, but it really deserves attention. Obviously it must be evaluated for the sectors for which it was born, it is useless to take it to Mugello to say that it does not have enough gust ... with the lenses I have (canon TS) and zeiss it's great. Electronic viewfinder (the first for me) very good, I do not regret the mirror. sent on June 11, 2022 |
 | Canon TS-E 17mm f/4 L Pros: focal wide without appreciable distortions and TS Cons: those connected with the project... Physiological Opinion: Two lines to say mine: I have this lens recently but I am using it very intensively for photographic reliefs in interiors (decorated walls and ceilings). Given the need to keep the real geometries as truthful as possible, I went from the spherical bubble of the stand to high sensitivity linear bubbles, I must say that it really takes a lot of attention to the micrometric adjustments of the head, and an external display is almost indispensable to improve the frame. Having said that, the results are excellent, the better the more patience has been devoted to positioning. For what I'm doing, a controlled light is essential, but this is another story... sent on December 04, 2020 |
 | Leica PC-Super-Angulon-R 28mm f/2.8 Pros: light weight, ease of use, versatile, balanced colors Cons: price a little high on the used market, it takes patience Opinion: It deserves all your time in trying the piece and the right price. Very fun to use, it offers shots inconceivable if you have never used a Shiftable. Focal perfect for use as "disengaged" and holiday. He does not mind at the ambientati portraits and, if desired, close-ups. Blurs fine, balanced colors, to the limit in a bit desaturated. Put it in the wish-list, highly recommended to all investigators. sent on May 07, 2016 |
 | Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5 L II Pros: flawless construction, excellent sharpness in the center, good at the edges (shift 100%) from f8, absent distortion, chromatic aberration almost nothing Cons: weight; Opinion: Found new to physical store at a price that could not leave me stop watching it go away ... at the time I was torn between this and the leica superangulon 28R. Now that I have both of them can say that they are both at the highest levels, the super-Angulon is "firm" for reasons and millimeter focal shift to smaller shots, but retain more balanced proportions in the composition. The 24TS is big and heavy, has a much more sophisticated mechanism. More specialized. 28r with you is just fine even in "not very engaged" outputs, it is almost a handyman ... the 24TS is a real superpro. The final Wide Attachment, be persistent and give chase ... once you tried a TS you will never go back! sent on May 07, 2016 |
 | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 Pros: It makes you shoot like crazy to anything Cons: The counter is that you need another body to use other lenses, I wont pull more Opinion: This opinion is not reliable, I write in a state of total potting. It 's my fourth Zeiss lens but I can not stop falling in love with these wonderful glass. It has amazing colors, a 3D beyond belief. As exciting as a few other purchases in life ... Then the MAF TA easily makes mistakes, but mistakes you learn! RnSe want a 35 character over really think about it, even if the competition (especially in Canon mount) is very agguerrrita ... sent on November 07, 2014 |
 | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Distagon T* 28mm f/2 Pros: Resistance to flare, color, small footprint Cons: It should make its unique characteristics of creative ideas Opinion: To the known pro of Zeiss adds the character resulting from certain vignetting and a marked curvature of the focal plane .... The 28/2 Distagon offers an extremely pleasant bokeh background that is in foreground, together with the curvature of field and (f / 2) a certain vignetting, which must be well exploited to produce effects in reality not possible with other 28mm. RNE 'the lens of an artist who does not give an immediate understanding. Especially f / 2 Distagon 28 can be used to draw attention to the subject as a few other lenses. Diaphragmed the features present in TA are reduced, but still produces a rendering unusual. Only with the experience develops the ability to take advantage of its behavior, such as driving a sports car can be dangerous and frustrating, but also very rewarding once mastered. A challenge. sent on August 17, 2014 |
 | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 Pros: Compact, indestructible, magical Cons: I believe that the Zeiss will depreciate much compared to new, probably due to the extremely low demand. For those who find the used is a pro.rnNoto also that the construction and the maf zeiss manual tend to become a hard drug, any other optical looks like a toy. This is a counter for the portfolio ... Opinion: What to say: close to perfection. Built impeccably could be passed down to their children like clockwork level. A razor definition and a machine for cream in the bokeh, the subject emerges from a delicate background and painting. Colors and exceptional contrast. Ring that rotates 360 for a maf that is an experience apart. It seems that there is a devil inside of Boltzmann putting in place the pixels one by one ... Try an optical distortion 1% and then try this that does not distort at all ... A world apart from Zeiss, enter it and you will understand : even a simple UV filter is "different" ... sent on August 09, 2014 |
 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Pros: Sharpness, opening Cons: Ring maf hard, very precise. If you do not go to AF is not easy even in manual Opinion: Bought after having praised the qualities of big brother 85 does not disappoint. It seems a bit slow at times the focus. Very sharp, good bokeh. Compared to the 1.2 canon distance will also be significant, but so is the price difference ... I also believe that in some cases the high price of food a bit of mythology among those who can not afford to buy ... you have in mind those red cars with a stemmino black on a yellow background? sent on July 14, 2014 |
 | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Distagon T* 18mm f/3.5 Pros: Unsurpassed build quality, sharpness, focal Cons: The most significant defect is a visible distortion in whisker, sometimes unpleasant. Correctable pp with obvious clarity decay. Cartoon a little to the TA. Opinion: I'm happy but unworthy owner of this perspective, I am not able to report extensively about. One thing I can say: maf manual certainly requires a mental change in the shot, perhaps more than most people realize. In this beginning with the wide-angle certainly help matters, for obvious reasons of PDC.rnL'obiettivo is fantastic, always expect to be able to use and experience, if only rained a little less .... it looks like a 40-year-piece mounted on a contemporary body , you get a feeling of an object out of time, built when the plastic and metal alloys did not exist. This marked "made in japan" clashes a bit ;-) rnDopo thinking I preferred to even blasonatissimo 21 to less weight-footprint-price focus. sent on June 29, 2014 |
 | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Pros: quality / price ratio, aperture 1.4, construction Cons: ring in too short hike (90 ° between 85 cm to infinity) and a little duretta if you want to use the MAF manual Opinion: Very first impression, but I would add a note also the same because the reviews are so far few giant front lens ... that alone says a lot, solid construction and excellent finish. Autofocus very accurate (in my copy). Costs half the canon 1.2, I do not argue that the canon is superior but also having to do the math ... sent on June 11, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
