|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mbi www.juzaphoto.com/p/Mbi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 19mm f/2.8 DN Pros: Sharpness, price, lens hood included Cons: Poor flare resistance, more elegant focus ring than praticarn Opinion: I tried the Sigma 19 mm on the Sony Alpha 6000. The optics show up with a sleek and modern design, but a practical rubber cover on the focus ring would not spoil it. The mechanism is fluid.rnThe most interesting feature is sharpness: it does not disappoint even at edges and corners. Distortion is present but in line with the focal type. Chromatic aberrations are easily eliminated in post-production. The only real defect is a poor resilience to the flare. The price is really interesting. Kit comes with a hood and a soft bag. sent on May 08, 2017 |
 | Manfrotto 488 RC0 Pros: "Handyman", hexagonal plates, robustness Cons: - Opinion: I used it for years in tandem with the Manfrotto 055XB tripod and I did not find to complain about defects. A head "handyman" that lends itself so well as for use in landscape or macro for use with telephoto lenses, while not being a head dedicated to a specific genre of ripresa.rnLa ball has generous dimensions and movements are fluid. The construction is typical Manfrotto that does not disappoint and, year after year, it is hard to distinguish the object from nuovo.rnLa hexagonal plates, which on one side provides ample footprint, gives a little 'mind if you bring the camera around your neck / shoulder unscrew it without seeing that in any positions mountains or an edge rests invariably goes crashing down, but it is a problem to overcome. sent on August 23, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto 055 XB Pros: robust, stable, minimum height from the ground using "no" column Cons: weight Opinion: Used for years and only recently replaced with a lighter model after the transition to mirrorless system. rnNonostante years of use still looked new, both aesthetically and in terms of mechanics. The only maintenance performed - among other things at once - it was grease the mechanisms that release the 3 sections shorter cavalletto.rnLe consisting of "padding" which are 2 of the 3 tubes get really appreciate when working at low temperatures isolating good cold aluminum, or when you take the stand leaning against the spalla.rnAltra relevant characteristic the possibility to remove the column and replace it with a threaded connection (supplied) to the length of a few centimeters that can reach a height really minimal strength terra.rnLa you pay for but in terms of weight (and size): take it back for long trips (but also for a few hours of wandering as a tourist) is inconvenient if not prohibitive. Difficult to carry clipped to a backpack and tiring to hold for long, his impiego ideal in locations easily accessible by car and to make shots that do not involve the excessive removal of the medium. sent on August 22, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: bright constant aperture, quality costruttivarn Cons: - Opinion: Excellent performance at 16mm is at the center than at the edges, considering the wide-angle focal length. Particularly useful for shooting in cramped and poorly lit or scenarios to capture large environments are difficult to access. The range of focal lengths, albeit content, however, makes it more practical than optics fixed and can become indispensable in cases in which the freedom of movement is limited. As optical landscape objectives rather more versatile as the 24-105 but, even if you do not use the 16-35 so frequently on several occasions proved to be indispensable. sent on June 25, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Pros: sharpness, brightness, prezzorn Cons: improved construction Opinion: From the point of view of an optical lens is great, really sharp, with constant yield from the center to the edges; chromatic aberrations almost absent. From the constructive point of view improved, in particular the ring of the focusing a manual. Considering the value you can still pass over this aspect seen that in each case focusing a precise result. To use freehand would of been nice stabilization, but this aspect was not part of the thought - certainly not at the level of yield constructive - like professional grade optics (L). The newest version, series L, is stabilized and tropical ... but it has a very different price. Ultimately it is a crystal clear lens that gives its best in macro shooting. Side note: annoying having to buy the lens hood separately. sent on May 30, 2014 |
 | Sigma 100-300mm f/4 DG EX HSM Pros: AF, image quality, constant aperture at all focal lengths Cons: lack stabilization, with dedicated multiplier of 1.4x full frame strong vignetting even diaframmandorn Opinion: Optics clear that maintains good performance also coupled to the dedicated Sigma 1.4x multiplier. Fast AF. Comfortable is the collar that can be removed without having to remove the lens from the camera is the wide ring for focusing. The only real defect in the few days of use was vignetting on full frame mounted with the multiplier, also diaframmando. sent on May 23, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Pros: range of focal lengths, image quality, good compactness / weight in relation to the focal copertern Cons: stabilizer of the older generation, to remove the collar you have to remove the lens from the camera body, not constant aperture at all focal lengths, no weather sealing Opinion: One of the few that adopt an optical zoom mechanism to pump, from which the colloquial name of "Pompone". Although the project is still not dated and renewed perspective is almost unique (although universal optical manufacturers over the years have begun to provide alternatives) for tele focal range of indoor and image quality remained almost constant at all focal lengths. Also interesting is the price in relation to quality and practicality. The mechanism for zooming pump, which you get used quickly, it is intuitive and allows you to move with extreme speed from a focal another: very useful in action photography. The robustness and build quality is typical of professional goals (L) Canon. sent on May 20, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: focal range, constant aperture, image stabilization, robust construction, weather sealing Cons: - Opinion: First L-series lens (professional) for many 5D owners since it was sold (also) in a kit with the camera body at an attractive price. Zoom to a good standard with a range of focal lengths that make it ideal for many shooting situations. Appreciable (on full frame) and the wide-angle 24mm, despite this focus show more defects (distortion / chromatic aberration), automatic correction of lens through raw converter makes them disappear. The AF is fast, the image quality is good. View compact (considering that it is an f / 4 constant professional) that allows you to have the most commonly used focal lengths in travel and landscape photography without having to go down to excessive compromise between quality and portability. sent on May 19, 2014 |
 | Fujifilm Finepix X20 Pros: portability, stabilization, macro mode / super macro, zoom ring on the lens barrel through, good image quality, sleigh contact caldorn Cons: manual focus and optical viewfinder impractical, slow sync flash mode sometimes does not work even if enabled Opinion: Compact camera with the retro style that combines aesthetics and quality. Overall it is a valuable tool and a pleasure to use: once you forget to have it hanging on the shoulder, but at the moment of the potentiality that offers are remarkable. The body is solid and well finished; delicate lock of the battery inside the compartment in fondello.rnL 'optical light over the whole range of focal lengths. The small sensor, though not very small, allows you to take a relatively open aperture while maintaining a good depth of field; at smaller apertures quality degrades visibilmente.rnI jpeg files are fully usable, even if you do not want to devote too much time to post-production results you get are - overall - better than those resulting from the development of RAW with Camera Raw . rnIl cap lens cover (pressure) is not very practical: you do not remove it without Riec to turn on the camera because the power switch is incorporated in the zoom ring. Even the ring /button on the back is not very practical while the other controls, considering the compact object, are adequate. RNLA autofocus is rapida.rnL 'lack of AA filter helps ensure the clarity of images but, in situations of high contrast light, even to the formation of halos around the edges. sent on May 18, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
