|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Carmelo S. www.juzaphoto.com/p/CarmeloS.  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XF10 Pros: File quality and jpg Fuji, ISO seal, portability and discretion, battery. Cons: AF system but I would also say MF. Opinion: Those who want that paste that fuji knows how to give in its JPGs, will find in the XF10 what it seeks, ISO kept large, light and anonymous with fixed optics that does not flow (just like a fixed lens from reflex or mirrorless), no frontal writing that can attract attention, discreet handling. But if you have to capture the moment (what this machine was designed for, of course and not only) with the autofocus systems available, but where do you need to go? Then the alternative is to use the snapshot, with the focus zone at 2m f8 or 5m f5.6, not bad! If you want to create other areas of fire then you have to use the fire manual and choose a diaphragm (as you would with any other machine), but nothing, manages to make even the MF, in the sense that the photo is moved even with times of 1/60s and steady hand, then raise the ISO and go that in the evening if you are not at 6400 do nothing! I am certainly not an inveterate fujista, but for about 4 years I also own an x30, of course the quality of the file is not that of the XF10, but everything else... another story! For me a bad purchase (for me). sent on July 16, 2020 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Cost, compactness and lightness, silent and rapid focus. Cons: Decrease in sharpness as you approach the edges of the frame (even at high f values, but for this figure!), perhaps the most "weak" among the STM. Opinion: With This lens I hope to have reached the peace of the senses, in fact without realizing or almost completed a kit that contains all 5 STM lenses of my interest. There is only I have a few days and I have not yet had the way to test it well, but given the other goals in my possession, I already think I have an idea about. The Classic Construction is the zoom STM, in plastic so light, but well-assembled. The sliding and fluid barrel, and which does not escape more than half a centimeter, thus maintaining the compactness of the lens. Of course we complain that it is not bright, indoors would force to raise the ISO, but I tend to think that when you use a wide-angle focal you want to shoot with great depth of field and therefore you tend to close the diaphragm and I am sure that I will work from F 7.1 up. I Say this because from the usual homemade test that I do to every lens that I am in my hands, the best results in terms of sharpness this lens from between F 7.1 and F14. Staying on the sharpness is much the difference between the center of the frame and the margins that seem a bit soft, even at more closed diaphragms. The focus is in the same way as the other STM zooms. sent on March 06, 2019 |
 | Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Value for money, sharpness, weight/size. Cons: Original lens hood exaggeratedly expensive. Opinion: Lens already sharp at TA, with peak on F4-F 4.5 in the middle and middle frame area and F 7.1 on the edges, up to F16 Utilizabilissimo, by F18 the sharpness suddenly degrades. Vignetting pronounced ad f2.8 and barrel effect from normal wide angle. AF quite silent and quick (only a slight sibillio is audible). It seems that for the hood there is not a version built by third parties and then who wanted it, would be forced to buy the original. sent on July 08, 2018 |
 | Canon 1100D Pros: Battery life, lightness and portability, weight and quality of raw files, menu customization and q key. Cons: Display for livew use. , lack of spot reading. For those who make video only the possibility of 720HD, ISO selectable only in stop (full) then 400/800/1600 etc. Opinion: My first is SLR, because with this machine I found a very sensitive feeling and I love it in the merits and limits, and then are precisely those limits to make this Canon unique, as the screen that not very resolute does not make it easy to put fire in livew. but you can do the same and absorb little battery. The perfect resolution, neither too much nor that makes you forget the micro blur, even with telephoto. And then the ease in use even in the vastness of customization, and you will not find any type of toy or miniature filters, etc. almost like a professional. You take a great or small wonder the right and this on any hand, fits like a glove. Limited video department but for me, not turning video, irrelevant. But the lack of spot reading I find it really unjustifiable, especially since I find it on the small sx220 that I also own and that makes the spot a marvel. The use with stm lenses that already discrete with dpp see all the defects of vignetting, distortion etc .. if they can be considereddefects. ISO? up to ISO 800/1000 is perfect. I see everyone running behind the last arrival, but I stay with the last of his class and with great satisfaction every time I use it.rn sent on November 14, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X30 Pros: Many. Cons: Many other or maybe nothing, you must always take into account what you have in hand. Opinion: I'll try to give information in this space that has not already been said on the X30 (all sacrosanct things I read is re-read) .rnChe face 470 shots with a more optimistic that charging is utopian, nevertheless with a bit of attention in the use and the resp option. energy, you can stay well calm for a while, unfortunately or fortunately charging can be done in smartphone style, only need at least 4 hours. Decent sensor and that practically corresponds to 1/2 "(2/3 as) technical details, does its job, nothing more nor less and raised Lazarus style miracles and do not walk if they are seen, qualitatively it may very well He placed in the middle position that is between the sensor 1 / 1.7 "(those used in developed compact eg. g15 canon or nikon 7800 and now endangered), and those from a 1" becoming more common and they see in sony RX100 the capostipide, and who says that to file quality is to paragpnabileentry level SLR know that my goal with 18 1100D 55 DC iii this fuji if eats for breakfast and also does not burp after, material and finishes, the x30 equipment and furnishings is clearly superiore.rnHo fact of the simple home test for estimate the ISO seal is the sharpness of the diaphragm to the various openings: from ISO 100 to 640 will have the best results; from 800 to 3200 retail and still good noise, light desaturation; ISO from 3600 to 6400 increased decisive noise, still good detail and saturation; ISO 12800 freefall (NR -2 JPG, of course, is not a comparison with other machines that already with ISO 100 may result Please see best) rnPer regarding the sharpness to the various apertures: f2.8 at the center is the sharpest, while the edges F3.6 is the sharpest; f4.0 is the best sharpness compromise both the center and the edges. If you really want to close the iris I would not go over f5.6, f6.4 fact is visible from a sharp decline of sharpness throughout the frame (noticeable with the files displayed100%) and then f5.6 on a sensor means so much depth of campo..rnMolto well done miniature effects in the room, a bit too saturated though! and the panorama that gives you the opportunity to also shoot vertically moving it horizontally and were able to achieve in this way very large files, plus you get that effect fish eye that, for better or for worse a real lens darebbe.rnCi are three ISO auto settings, shame there are limits in customization. Profits the film simulation, I use it for STD in the chart provided by Fuji is what is at the center of the spectrum saturation / contrast (also taking in jpg I like to make some small corrections to the images if they are needed, or turn them in bn) .A thing I like very much is an indication of the equivalent focal lens, for me it is a landmark I like to stop on the numbers and the middle ground, like I have many fixed lens es. 28 35 42.5 50 67.5 85 112mm, I knowThey are outside. The lens makes the difference and returns images as saying "three-dimensional" ... we understand each other very well. To use an adjective that leaves open to interpretation and difficult definition to say that this camera is "cumbersome", that every shot could turn into a birth and not because it is lightning-fast autofocus, but do not know there are too many amminnicoli, too many possibilities and menu that after all be able to handle them, but perhaps never to digest, well welcome to the world fuji then, then canon whole life I that even the compact system powershot.rnMi avail in time to change or add anything, I'd get feedback that concern specifically the use of the camera, or other settings that help us grow. You could create an exclusive blog to X30 esempio.rnConfusionario I know call me caxxo confused. Ciao.rn sent on October 18, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Sharpness, AF, Stabilizer, weight and overall dimensions, close-up. Cons: 29-88 mm Opinion: Compare this objective at 18-55 DC III owned previously (virtually smooth I'IS II) .rnAF faster and absolutely silent, slightly higher sharpness with positive response and constant f3.5 to f11 (DC in the f 5.0 was the best opening). Multiplication factor which rose from 0.36 x0,34 (having them had I been able to simultaneously compare them on this aspect, and damn little improvement there and it shows) .rnLeggermente longer and heavier but still very light (as the materials) but perfect. Stabilizer on DC III was missing, here even to say what would be its advantages pratici.rnPerfetto targeting all do, on the road I took it with me and I only suffered a little for wide-angle and tele, a few millimeters of focal down and up it would be better. sent on July 09, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Light weight, size, sharpness clearly fixed and brightness, price, construction, and it is just beautiful (elegant). Cons: Hood Original quite expensive and makes the ring of MAF mounted a bit uncomfortable. Opinion: Opinion based on a comparison to other stm objectives in my possession (18-55 and 55-250) .rnAF less fast and quiet but still fast and accurate, MAF also slightly noisy (like a roaring lion but, the sooner by cat cooled) .rnLa lens being quite returned arises already in discreet protection status, which goes significantly increasing with the mounting of paraluce.rnCostruzione that looks better than others stm (best finish) and greater clarity than the already good zoom .rnUn defect that is not a fault ..., the typical electronic MAF of these objectives and to which I will never get used to it! sent on June 20, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Pros: quality / price ratio, trasportabilià, silent AF and fast enough, the fluid zoom ring, MF Full-Time, stabilizer, sharpness at all apertures, close-up. Cons: Vignetting, no hood, AF sometimes uncertain, tends to underexpose. Opinion: I recently purchased this objective. I must say that the more you "zomma" more vignetting is evident, the problem completely solved using DPP. In normal lighting situations I happened that the MF does not agganciasse and the length of the barrel that comes out makes you want to have undergone a lens hood, this is not provided! RnFacendo a simple test I found in f6.3 / F7.1 / f. 8 the apertures that return a sharper picture with different depth of field course. All other openings are still very good and the difference with these three is minimal and up to f13 I think you can shoot in tranquillità.rnAF fairly fast, still faster than my IS II, and absolutely silent motor. Maggiormante chance to get closer to the subject than the precedente.rnTrasportabilità model, as the aps-c / lens with hood closed, enters into a normal holster reflex. sent on June 14, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
