|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Silvestrom www.juzaphoto.com/p/Silvestrom ![]() |
![]() | Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Pros: Construction, image quality, brightness, internal zoom, fluidity of the ferrules Cons: Pesantuccio (but balanced), AF good but not as fast and precise as other Canon lenses (higher end though), not easy to use at room temperature and AF to calibrate almost certainly. Opinion: I bought recently for my Canon 70D and tried it indoors. excellent construction (much higher than the 17-55 canon), fairly quiet and accurate AF (f / 1.8 is not perfect). The quality and sharpness of the images is embarrassing (in a good way) than other objectives of this belt. hand-free use in TA is not easy because of the reduced pdc, we must make us a little 'hands. Council usb dock purchase Sigma because it is very likely that the AF should be calibrated. The lens hood is standard and the graft is a bit 'hard, but so be it. Many say that the hike is too small and lacks the stabilizer .. well .. try to imagine a similar lens that has greater zoom range (f / 1.8 constant) and stabilizer .. weighed at least twice and it cost 4 times much. more than a handyman is a zoom lens that encompasses fixed focal 3 used a lot (18-24 - 35). Buy it only if you are notlla looking for a "travel-rounder". The non tropicalization is not a defect seen that 99% of the aps-c is not tropicalized (no sense a weather sealed lens on a body not weather sealed). It is the best lens for aps-c on the market. sent on February 25, 2016 |
![]() | Patona Premium LP-E6 Pros: Economic, it has the recognition chip as lp-e6 and works as the original canon Cons: nobody Opinion: I purchased a premium Patona Lp-E6 as second battery and I would say that is identical to the original, for the same duration but costs less than half. It can be charged with the charger supplied with the machine. compared to Patona classic has more capacity and duration're ready to .. the absolutely recommend !! sent on November 11, 2015 |
![]() | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Bokeh improved, silent AF and fast enough, sharpness, price Cons: (In my case) the graft was not initially very fluid, softness in TA Opinion: Just bought, is appreciated than its predecessor for a construction best (best plastic and bayonet metal instead of plastic), the ring of manual focusing is much improved and is now a true nut, was virtually absent in the predecessor. The STM autofocus is fast and very quiet, has good sharpness but is a little morbdo to TA. the first coupling to the machine was not very fluid, perhaps because the goal was new, already the third / fourth time you screwed more fluidly. I paid 139 Euros, I did not expect the sharpness of 1.4, but makes her look good. Prefer this to the old 50mm f / 1.8 II? Optically it is similar, but the answer is: Yes, the 7-blade (instead of 5) return a lot nicer bokeh bokeh polygon of the old '1.8 II (pentagonal), the autofocus no longer crrrrr-zzzrr- cccrrr, and there will seem to have in hand a piece of plastic vuoto.rnPS: the dimensions are "improved", in the sense that this has a lesser length (39mm vs 51mm), but a weight of 30 gr higher (160 vs 130) sent on May 27, 2015 |
![]() | Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Pros: Light, cheap, good focal range Cons: Autofocus, lack of stabilizer Opinion: Economic objective and good construction, does his duty to a certain focus, then no stabilizer is hard to use. On stand does its job well (always compared to the price), but freehand hardly be satisfied with the results. The autofocus is quite noisy but effective enough. It does its job but you have to accept compromises .. much better than the 55-250 ... sent on May 04, 2015 |
![]() | Manfrotto 410 Pros: Precise, stable, excellent construction. Cons: Heavy, cumbersome and in some cases (just) a little uncomfortable. Opinion: When I opened the package I thought "hell, but is gigantic" and in fact it is pretty big and heavy, once put to the test, however, will become happy immediately purchase for its robustness and accuracy; plate quick release is great and reliable (but do not forget to tighten the screw, if tighten with fingers only and not with a coin as the manual suggests its reliability goes down the drain and you will notice that the camera will tend to unscrew ). the movements are fluid and precise, it is possible to make big moves by unlocking the ring, of course you can do it for all three movements. with the tripod placed low shot is not always convenient. for macro and landscape is the best head on the market. Taken on Amazon France on offer at 110 Euros, that is all that money. sent on May 03, 2015 |
![]() | Canon 70D Pros: Fast, lightweight, good AF in live view is lightning, swivel LCD. Cons: "Swiveling LCD", lack the second slot (as everyone has said, but it is a shame for such a car) Opinion: I bought it in early December in the coupled L. 24-105 autofocus is lightning, produces excellent file even at high ISO. unlike many of the complaints, the ring back a little smaller than usual I do not mind. I'm sorry for the lack of seconds instead slot for a second memory. The swiveling display find it convenient in some situation, but opened and closed continuously at a certain point may give the idea of ??fragility (not fragile but it is not). is one of the best aps-c market (after 7D markII probably), so I think it should be accompanied by good quality optics. It should be set for good (also the micro AF) and well designed, then it will be your faithful companion. sent on December 24, 2014 |
![]() | Manfrotto Pixi Pros: Cheap, light, solid, small but "great" Cons: No One Opinion: The Manfrotto Pixi in my opinion must be purchased together with the camera for 20 euro because it has a tripod ultra portable and solid. Tested with 70D and 24-105 L and is probably because I did not even tickle, even lowering the head forward (the 24-105 unbalances not just the 70D to its already). The ball head is not as fluid but after a while you use it is no longer a problem. Monstre! sent on December 24, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me