|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Federico_28 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Federico_28 ![]() |
![]() | Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Quality appropriate to the cost, when without faults. Cons: White dot inside the back lens Opinion: I always thought that the canon does not know how to do the 24-105 and I talk about all, old and new, I always preferred the Sigma 24-105 4.0 Art to Canon, high speech are the 24-70 canon unrivaled. I purchased the 24-105 STM for my daughter, Novo in store in Lugano at €300 now I am with on white dot in the rear lens, although irrelevant in the images, the thing is very annoying. sent on December 24, 2018 |
![]() | Manfrotto 058B Pros: For me the best tripod ever considering the article, also used by the best professionals with important equipment, eg. The perfect Canon 1200mm in the studio with the Manfrotto 127vs Cons: Not suitable for those who do mountain walks Opinion: Easy to put in bubbles without unscrew or open and close levers, purchased many years ago, used for the first years with optical bench indoors and outdoors, in recent years only in interiors suitable for studio work or for important equipment for weights and Size. I did this review to make this tripod known, for me one of the best but little known. Even if you are not interested, I suggest you try it to test the real potential of setting in work sent on October 23, 2018 |
![]() | Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM Pros: compactness, weight, sharpness at medium distances, price if purchased in Kit, AF, and is a 24-70mm, some say it's dark, find me a 24-70 also with F/4.0 weighing 130 gr. Cons: Not sharp at the minimum distance and long distances, the key is missing to deactivate the stabilizer, however I prefer it to 18-55 not only for the wide angle, but also for overall quality. Opinion: Recommended if purchased in kits, I was pleasantly surprised at the overall quality expressed by an optics 15-45 F 3.5-6.3 from A.C. €60 in kit, I never hung the 18-55, bought only because some cameras were cheaper with the lens in kits that With the body alone. of negative I find that the focus at the minimum distance is able to have a good magnification ratio, but with decay of quality, as well as in long distances. To conclude I find it overall excellent, for quality, price, and focal excursion starting from 15mm, if then one considers it unsatisfactory, there are the EF with other costs and weights. Recommended for an amateur and carefree use. sent on May 21, 2018 |
![]() | Canon EOS M50 Pros: Size, weight, articulated LCD, JPG quality, price, rating 9.7 Cons: Unreliable the first two characters, having given a rating of 3.7, revelers or else ... For this reason i think the review ratings are unreliable, excess both at fault. Opinion: Let me start by saying not to be interested in the video, I just need to find a small, light, with Central articulated LCD viewfinder, with price defiantly. This met all the features for my needs ... and most of all was to be a Canon, although for many there are so many other top models for money at EOS M50, for me there are also factors of empathy. sent on April 03, 2018 |
![]() | Sigma 2x EX DG Pros: Having the Sigma 70-200 2.8 before the series duplicator improves the quality review also made the magazine All Photographers the contrary del'Extender 1.4 that a review had not better than the 2x while in Juza has a higher rating, having both say Pro for 2x EX DG Cons: No, as it improves the optics of the Sigma 70-200 2.8 contrary to what you think of duplicating logically speaking of several years ago Opinion: As mentioned improves the quality of the built and dedicated optically 70-200 2.8 Sigma 70-200 2.8 for the first series envi lens as they say the tests done by the magazine the Sigma 70-200 2.8 improves with doubler 2x EX DG eliminating the edges where the sharpness tends to degrade. With other lenses I can not say that it is good altrettano having tried only with the Sigma 70-200 2.8 sent on October 23, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me