|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Claudio Salari www.juzaphoto.com/p/ClaudioSalari  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X-T10 Pros: Sensor, films, Aesthetics, lightness Cons: For its price virtually none Opinion: I used the XT10 for four months before moving to the XT1. I did it only for a matter of grip and the weather sealing; for the rest of the 10 has nothing to envy the most expensive 1. Same file, same features, same Af and in addition here there is a small built-in flash, the car is lighter and there's the convenient Auto function It allows you to also use the machine to a total wimp? when you need them. Of course, the materials are not premium as in T1, but, in my opinion, unless you have big hands and do not need tropicalization and, above all, if you want to save a nice nest egg to invest in a lens, this is the right machine. sent on February 29, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R Pros: General high optical quality already at f1.4 - Dimensions and weight acceptable - All metal construction of high level Cons: AF a bit 'noisy - Af to "bounce" Opinion: It 'the first lens that I bought and mounted on my XT10, small, lightweight and built entirely of metal. With the ring aperture diaphragms on the barrel (convenient) and the manual focus ring well sized, and rightly fluida.rnrnOtticamente games without speaking, coming from some optical Canon L series, I've had only pleasant surprises. The sharpness at f1.4 is a reference, the colors reproduced, the total absence of chromatic aberration, purple fringing, coma, vignetting, distortion and above all to bring you to have the f1.4 aperture Ghira practically nailed to the maximum opening. Ok, defects will be corrected "on camera" but if this is the result ... well is the software correction lens ;-) rnrnL'unico real drawback of this lens is the AF noise (nothing earth-shattering) and the fact who, like other optical Fuji first generation, while, during the autofocus tends to make a small and annoying "drakes" before you givethe signal at the OK. rnrn sent on December 03, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Sharpness F1.8 - fast AF precise and quiet - Bokeh pasty - Minimum focus distance - weight, size, portability Cons: For the price that you can not blame defects Opinion: After a disastrous experience with the Sigma 50mm f1.4 (not ART) and a good experience with the Canon 50 f1.8 Mk 2, I decided to go to 50 STM. Well, what about ... I found the peace of mind !! rnrnIl little guy has covered thoroughly every deficiency of its predecessor with a leap incredibile.rnrnEsteticamente and touch plastics are more pleasant, the bayonet is made of metal, the ring AF can be defined as such (who drive the Mk 2 know what I mean ;-)), the AF is nicer and more complex there is under the impression of a goal giocattolo.rnrnL'AF is the real big jump Quality, not only much, much quieter but also far more accurate. A f1.8 not miss a beat !!!! rnrnA optical level I noticed that the sharpness at the center improved significantly, almost 2/3 stop. Also the 7-blade return a Bokeh softer and more pleasant and the flare is much smaller and gestibile.rnrnUltimo but not least,the minimum distance of focus of 35 cm allows you to get very close to the subject with creative possibilities aumentate.rnrnPer me it is a wonderful lens that next without delay and sense of inferiority to my kit series L 17-40 and 24-105 100-400. rnrnBest Buy ASSOLUTOrnrnGrande CANON !! rnrn sent on July 09, 2015 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: Excellent sharpness throughout the frame f 2.8 - Bokeh soft and perfectly "round" - Chromatic aberrations and purple fringing practically inesisteni - Colours very real Cons: AF in a bit noisy that require fine adjustments - not excellent build quality (see below) Opinion: A little gem for everyone! rnrnOtticamente this lens surprised me since the first day I owned it. I do not speak of a pure speech quality / price, is almost free from any flaw, it seems to have in hand a fixed focal length of those superblasonati for so works well. The thing I love is that I can work pretty much always at f2.8 without worries of little sharpness (both at the center than at the edges) and an AF that despite the noise, it is a true sniper. The aberrations are virtually non-existent and has an excellent resistance to flare.rnrnPassiamo defects:. My model suffers from front focus and I had to adjust to +10 with fine adjustments. From the constructive side my copy (but I have seen on the net that is quite common) had a problem with the ring that covers the last front lens: at one point he started to have a game annoying due to the continuous slide the lens with a lens camera from the bag. Luckily I found a video on youtube where they explain how to fix the problem with a small screwdriver small star by & anduro; 3.rnrnConsigliatissimo who is looking for a handyman zoom for APS and requires no stabilizer. I have preferred to model and stabilized at 17-55 f 2.8 canon after reading the reviews and seeing JUZAPHOTO comparisons of optical quality of www.the-digital-picture.comrnrn sent on June 25, 2013 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: Value / Price - AF - Gust - Personalization - Egonomia - General quality image Cons: Screen is not articulated - Yield ISO higher than 3200 Opinion: You either like it or you hate it. This would seem to be a summary of dozens and dozens of posts regarding this machine much discussed. There is one who is fully satisfied and those who say they have sold a few months later in despair. I belong to the first category. I own the 6 months, purchased on the Internet at less than € 1,100, I find it a body with a quality / price ratio amazing. I do not think it is the ideal machine for a pixel peeper because actually, looking at the images on the monitor at 100% you can not complain of slight noise even at ISO 100. However, if there are "satisfied" to look at the photographs to maximum print size (54.86 cm x 36.58 cm) then you will notice that the image is always clean, engraved, fully usable up to ISO 3200 (if properly exposed), and extreme cases, previous use of reduced noise, even at ISO 6,400 and 12,800. The noise is greater chroma (easily removed in ACR) to luminance occurs with much punctuationend (which therefore does not ruin much the engraving of the image). The burst trigger is fast, the AF 19 points and also focus on the cross are always comfortable and precise. In fact, the management of AF in AI Servo, with all the many settings available to it, embarrassing the less experienced user of electronics. With a little 'study and many practice tests are still unable to find the setting most appropriate to the subject to be photographed. Useful the possibility of "micro" lens, I have used the 50ino that, otherwise I would have thrown out the window as suffering from chronic front focus. Useful three customizable positions on the ring and in general the myriad of possibilities to adapt the car like a glove the way you photograph. The viewfinder with 100% 1X magnification gives a comprehensive view of the field that allows you to compose accurately. Objectively, the best APS-C Canon ever. sent on March 26, 2012 |
 | Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: Sharpness, color, contrast (image quality always excellent), AF and stabilizer. Cons: Brightness, a little vignette in 85mm, lens hood sold separately, always too much PDC. Opinion: Perspective of a high standard, very determined, very real and contrasting colors. The ultrasonic AF is fast, accurate and silent. The IS, also silent, is by far the best I've ever tried, can always earn 3 stops, often four, sometimes even 4 1/2 (depending on the hand) I took many photos without a shake-85mm 1 / 6s (maybe leaning his back against a wall ... ;-)) This beautiful IS allows shooting at all focal lengths (also 85mm), indoors with minimal artificial light without a flash (static subjects clearly and ISO 1600). Very well built with plastic quality, the zoom ring is very progressive and has no annoying games it points more soft or hard, that the MF is precise and well geared down (type Full Time). Even if it is not weather sealed it happened to me at times to photograph under a bit of rain but never had any problems whatsoever. Adequate size to focal weight evenly distributed. . The range of focal lengths & egrave; amazing, especially in "low" 15mm back often useful and, for the portraits in the foreground and close up the 85mm is very convenient (although here f5, 6 penalizes the very blurred background). A great traveling companion that does not require compromise on image quality. Only real drawback is the great difficulty in obtaining beautiful backgrounds blurred if not a lot closer to the subject or taking distant backgrounds which, unfortunately, is often not feasible thing ... :-( On the other hand the optics need to get down to some compromise if it was an f2.8, with this range of focal lengths, it would be huge, heavy almeeeeno 1 kg and certainly cost twice as much (at least looking like his brother indicator 17 -55 f2.8) ;-) In my opinion equivalent to using the Canon 24-105 on FF with a range of focal lengths greater PDC but with a significantly worse. sent on January 23, 2012 |
 | Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM Pros: 8 mm (and I've said it all!) Cons: Can not be mounted filters - not exceptional resistance to flare Opinion: An extreme wide-angle high quality. Well built, solid, sharp and with good color rendering. Standard equipment complete with hard case and built-in hood. Fast and silent AF, MF precise and well modulated. Low distortion if valuatata in relation to the angle of 114 ° is obtained. If you want to 8 mm on APS-C there is no alternative. Would highly recommend for landscapes. If someone will sooner or later a solution and mount filters will make it objectively the best wide angle for aps-c. (Canon is lagging behind this time!) sent on November 17, 2011 |
 | Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Pros: Range of focal lengths, low cost, solid construction, supplied as standard with hood and case. Cons: AF and OS noisy, soft and recently recorded if diaphragmed. Opinion: Use of this lens by a bit of time as a "handyman" travel. And 'Solid, well built and with a range of focal lengths that almost always possible to shoot. Sharp enough to 50mm even at room temperature, must be prepunched to f8 to give good results at longer focal lengths. The AF is noisy and quite slow, the OS is noisy too, in my opinion, makes it possible to gain 2 stops. For what it costs today on the net and used is definitely a lens from the excellent value for money. sent on October 18, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: An adorable play at a price balance (Creativity to throttle ...) Cons: Bokeh in a bit hard, MF ring small and uncomfortable, Quality construction of a toy, noisy AF. Considering the price: no Opinion: 21rnrn sent on September 26, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
