|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Massimo Biasco www.juzaphoto.com/p/MassimoBiasco  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II Pros: Sharpness on all focal zooms not overly heavy excellent resolution even with low lights great with Canon MT 1/4 III loses very little AF excellent and good stabilizzattore that has 3 settings like the last generation of the brothers Cons: Nothing Opinion: For me it is one of the best zoom 100-400 in circulation seems to have been created together with the 7dii is an exceptional pairing and since I replaced it with the 400f. 5.6 I no longer removed from my 7dii use it even with the Canon MT1/4 III without any problem I use it even with the 5DIII for stolen portraits because it has an excellent blurred up to F. 8 I use it more for birdlife and up to 30mt. It is great if you use it in full light is amazing and with little light is spectacular is enough to hit AF immediately at the first shot and with times and ISO guessed that no Will disappoint you for me deserves a 10 + sent on January 21, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: Excellent sharpness at all focal lengths, color fidelity, unmatched, tropicalizzata.rn Cons: It lacks only the stabilizer Opinion: , I bought this lens after trying for three months that the 24-105 as ease of use, the color fidelity and IS can be a good lens but I did not meet the 24mm focal distortion and flare, I used only 50mm 100mm and did not satisfy me the little punch, I took the Tamron VC 24/70 f.2.8 but it was a cry, in low light was unusable, not hooked AF point and in shaded areas chromatically was not good, I tried the old 24/70 f.2.8 but I have not found one that went after bene.Ora Without some financial sacrifice I took this wonderful GOAL coupled to my 5DIII is a blade Incisiveness, Colors Stupendi, and working without flash and with lack of light with underexposed brings out all the colors that even the naked eye can distinguere.Per me is the BEST 24-70f.2.8 Outstanding and competes with many optical Fixed Focal Length of Equal. Worth every centime Speso.PER ME THIS AND 'THE REAL TUTTOFARE INSUSTITUIBILE.rnOTTICA RECOMMENDED TO THOSE LOOKING FOR QUALITY' sent on January 04, 2016 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness, Color, stabilizer, weather sealed Cons: Hood skimpy, AF works fine with adequate light but struggling a bit 'low light to focal low. Opinion: I purchased it recently because I needed a substitute 24-105L f.4 that although the last production I did not like the definition (too soft) for use with body 5DMark III. From the first pictures I found that AF has a fast but only in the presence of very good light and if you use it as I used it I quickly and often changing focal lengths, sometimes (with focal below the 40mm) struggling in MF especially with stabilizer entered and you can do no more than 2 photos of 5. In the rest of the situations is an excellent optics for me with excellent focal 70mm diaphragms on all the good blurry f.2.8 from f.4 onwards is very incisive with faithful colors , has a little 'vignetting at 24mm but not as the 24-105 that was terrible, AC light but only with front light and not as the 24-105 that was unrecoverable to 80%. Conclusions after 3 days of testing is that it has acquired an excellent lens not completely substitute the (24-105 that me'come zoom range is exceptionally good) but with F.2.8 best there is only the Canon 24-70L f. 2.8 II USM, while compared with the CanonSeries one (I've tried) is significantly better and recommended for those who can not afford the Canon 24-70L f.2.8 USM II. sent on February 27, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM Pros: Excellent quality 'optics, fast AF, excellent construction, Limiter MF button, rendering colors faithful and Bokeh EXCEPTIONAL Cons: Nothing defects Opinion: I needed a lens from a portrait and medium telephoto for sports photos more 'bright, having had the great satisfaction the 70-200L-f.4 IS USM I realized that I used very much the focal length 200 and many times with MT 1 / 4, having tried the Bianchino f.2.8 for over 7 hours, I realized that it was quite heavy compared to my F.4 and I decided to buy the 200f.2.8 Much lighter to need one more stop. And 'multipliable with both 1/4 that with 2X and having both APSC that the FF I match with 85-f.1.8 and I'm happy. For Portraits is for me 'EXCELLENT because' I do not like to get too close to the subject and the focal length 85-f.1.8 the use with the 70D when I bisogno.Ho also used the 200 with MT Kenko that both Canon and I only noticed a small slowdown of 'AF only with the 2X, but has a negligible Bokeh beautiful for my taste photograph, lacks only IS mè but not a limit to this perspective, one thing that I have not yet learned to exploit is the imitator AF that sometimes I forget to move, it is very useful for speedà AF but if you miss as sometimes happens to mè takes longer in the MF and you can make mistakes some shots, not a fault but an advantage if you learn to use it correttamente.Per me the 200mm f / 2.8 L II USM deserves nice 10 both for quality and for the price. sent on February 25, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Excellent Sharpness, Color superlatives Stabiliser precise, fast Af not miss a shot, Tropicalised, including hood a little 'uncomfortable to use, it is a perspective that keeps the price limiter MF from 1.20mt in Infinite e3,0mt to infinity Much useful for close-up pictures, Lightweight, multipliable. Cons: Mancacanza ring for Tripod (original Expensive), F4 Opinion: Since they are in possession can not do at least use it with both 70D with 5DMarkIII that has a light output with Spectacular colors and rendering Details Incisors much, I use it to 90% in Freehand is very portable you can Photographing throughout the day, you can multiply by 1 / 4x without losing too much quality on both formats, while the 2x can be used with parsimony with FF format with the APSC sconsiglio.Lo advice to those who can not afford to buy the Brother II 2.8 both the weight that the cost will not regret it I have tried the 2.8 but it is very heavy if you are not using it in the studio or with the tripod, and the True 2.8 II is more powerful because of the Focal wider and a construction more accurate multipliable with 2x without losing detail, but for what it costs if you want a zoom multipliable is the best 400 / 5.6 spending half or even the old 100/400. I use to remedy the 70-200f4-IS with MT1 / 4x with my 70D with no problem. sent on August 24, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
