|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bbboro94 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bbboro94  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Construction. Sharpness, contrast and overall image quality. Weight. Cons: Hood. Sharpness "absolute". Opinion: Small and lightweight but with a fantastic image quality overall, including color and sharpness. Zooming to 100% and a feeling that is not designed for modern sensors / dense (already 20 megapixel 6D are too many), but having an excellent local contrast still managed to convey all the necessary detail to take some good photos. I'm not a fan of the hood: as solid and effective doubles the space occupied by the objective, which is a shame as the compact size is one of the main reasons for choosing this goal. Despite being only f4 staccato plans in the portraits it is very good and also the yield of the fuzzy is pleasant. sent on July 28, 2015 |
 | Canon 1100D Pros: 12mp good photos. Price. Lightness. Everything at your fingertips. Battery life. Cons: Autofocus. Resolution LCD screen. Viewfinder pentamirror. Quality at high ISO and lack intermediate values. Lack of grip. (Video) Opinion: I have this camera for a year and a half, and in that time I learned to use it as you have to start manuale.rnPer mode is great: small, light, cheap, and above all extremely simple! The controls are just necessary and all within reach of the right thumb. Taken with the kit 18-55 3.5-5.6 IS II is a good all-rounder. The battery then lasts forever! RnrnMa is not perfect. ISO up to 6400, but over 400 quality decays quickly, and you can not select intermediate values ??(but automatically I happened to see "ISO 500"). From the low-resolution LCD screen often do not appreciate good photo quality (especially in the shadows with iso "high"). Pentamirror coverage with "only" 95%, little and dark. The smooth plastic is not conducive to grips with objectives "heavy" then it is quite sbilanciata.rnIl system focusing in low light conditions is disappointing, especially if you do not use the center cross point (compared with 19 in all d crossshe 7D seems out of the Stone Age: () rnRiprese video in up to 720p and only in automatic mode. However, quality apprezzabile.rnrnTirando sums: a great start and learn how to use a DSLR as it should. By this stage all the defects mentioned are negligible, then, learned the technique, you can also point to more professional models and complete. sent on May 28, 2014 |
 | Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Pros: sharpness, quality / price, brightness, "macro" Cons: chromatic aberrations, the color resolution with too much light Opinion: Glass fantastic. I use this lens on APSC and I find the zoom range much sense. The sharpness from f4 up is fantastic, lose a little below 'but if you do not have high demands is still usable, or for example in the portraits can also be enjoyable. The bokeh is very pleasant, although not always perfectly round. The color rendering is good but not fantastic, sometimes saturated a bit 'too much and especially with lights very strong. Unfortunately, sometimes we lose a little 'chromatic aberration ... but this is easily resolved in post production ;) rnConsiderando that the focus is always 28cm minimum to 75mm allows for interesting details, it is certainly not a true macro, but is still very utile.rnrnTirando sums: if you are looking for a goal-rounder, with a low price, this is the right goal! Sure it's not perfect, but if you're looking for a decent zoom, bright, crisp and without breaking your wallet, this Tamron I can not recommend it highly enough :) sent on April 21, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
