|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Anpet76 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Anpet76  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 7D Mark II Pros: Heir to the 7d, AF, AF mode selector, ergonomics, solid feel. Cons: Gps, "only" 20mp, flash, auto focus servo for videos not available to 50fps FHD Opinion: About a year ago we began to feel something sensible about the upcoming release of the 7D2. I was just hoping not to depart too much from the initial project 7D. As far as I'm concerned it did. Shape and weight almost identical. But speaking of the technical characteristics and its true there are things that I agree with and things that do not condivido.rnCondivido definitely the 'AF evolved. It is very complex, on a par with higher camera bodies. Still has so many settings that you can set to photograph anything. The technology itr is really working. I find it very useful lever customizable to handle the points and areas AF.rnIl sensor, in my opinion, is good. C 'is to say that not one who gets the mental saws with crop at 400% or you put them to photograph a sheet on a wall to do the calculations. Surely with the 7D to over 800iso there could almost never go. With the 7D2 leaving the iso files in Auto returns usable even in 12800. According to me its best between 400 and 6400 iso.rnCredo strongly that both una nice car but from the best with bright optics, performance and alas costose.rnAvrei pleasing 24 mp even giving up one stop iso.rnInteressante department video with af really working. Too bad that is not available in 50 / 60fps 1080p mode aiservo (I did not understand why ... I tried with is2 70-200, 16-35 IS, 40STM, 24-70 II) .rnGps and flash for me inutili.rnConclusioni : rnih around'm reading a lot of crap, for example comparisons between 7D2 and 7D2 and 5D3 ... ..... rnQuesta 6D is a car for those coming to 7D and wants to continue on the same line. Punto.rnLa not recommend it to those who are new to armi.rnLa recommend it to those who are second ... third weapons etc. sent on November 28, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pros: It is a plug 2.8 Cons: A bit small for the ring maf manual. 10mm for portraits in more or less for the rest of it would have been better ... and it would have been a more regular lens ... but that's okay Opinion: I wanted maximum firepower with minimum footprint. I took out the 50 1.4 ... And got this. I must say that a stop in less you do not hear much considering the shortcomings of the current 50 With any FF, Handstrap and this lens has a weapon in his hand photo leggera..snella ... essential. It lends itself well to the video ... I find it just a little bit small the ring for manual focus. In a nutshell ... it has become difficult for a lazy like me do not carry around the Canon if c is mounted in front of this thing! sent on September 28, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Weight and size, lens hood, sharpness, filters 77mm, overall quality. Cons: You have to learn to use it. The more you use more like it. Opinion: I have two copies. identical as quality immagine.Obiettivo of new conception on all points of view. I come from 2.8L 16-35, tokina 16-28 and 17-40L. It is the latter to which I have compared to a comparison. I've done some real evidence around with 6D. I turned off the stabilizer and made shots around a free hand to the parks and streets of the city. Really a nice lens. My copy is gorgeous at all focal lengths although personally I use it a lot in 16mm.Per the normal use of the advice to forget IS. Also great for the video where the IS acquires really makes sense. For landscape is great. A f4 is sharp but closing closing becomes phenomenal and the depth that gives the colors of the sky and clouds is spectacular. Recommended for those who do not know what to get between the various 16-35 16-28 17-40 etc.. sent on September 28, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD Pros: An optical ... more to be able to choose among the available poce Cons: Everything and nothing Opinion: In fact it is a 150-600 and 150-600 if you buy a 600 I want to use it. Between 500 and 600 is morbisoso and with the waning of the light a lot better raise the iso use the stabilizer. Autofocus interesting only on static subjects or in slow motion. I took about a thousand pictures with 6D and 7D. Quality of 'acceptable image from 150 to 400. Supreiore The canon 400 5.6L is in every way ... except for the focal ...... rnLo advice for those seeking a few millimeters in bastarn and more ... sent on June 24, 2014 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Quality construction and everything else mentioned below ... Cons: Do not light ... does not detach from the camera is weather sealed ... ;) rnNon being a fixed two seals put on the cross had been me I would have put SIGMA ... but who cares Opinion: I sold the 16-35L ... and took this and another. I made a deal. In my life I have had 3 sigma (including this one) and for those who are afraid of the problems and the like af calms down. Sigma has worked so hard ... well too. In my case I did not need any micro although I noticed that, by updating the fw with the dock usb purchased on a whim, has improved a lot the speed of maf. Nowadays one of the best goals ever owned ... for sure the best raw ever produced by Sigma ... at least for me.rnP.s. 6D is as a sandwich with mortadella and coupled incomparable ... sent on April 26, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM Pros: All Cons: None Opinion: Objective of the last century ... but now immortal. It does not have IS so it does not get old or technological components that can fail. The af however, is of great relevance for efficiency and velocità.Puro, simple, lightweight, fast, sharp. It is crisp already at rt for which the opening "limited" to 5.6 is not so provide limited 90% use it freehand with monopod but you have to know exactly what you are doing: just so you get great photos even "in hand. " However, if you should die ... I'd buy an identical door on the same day ... addiction. In short: a perfect lens for hunting traveling photographic and other applications where required featherweights and focal lengths. One last thing ... of course mine is just an opinion and not a detailed recenzione. This is to say that the goals should always be tested before purchasing one. sent on December 21, 2013 |
 | Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Macro VC USD Pros: A little of everything ... Cons: Stabilizer almost useless, not great aurofocus Opinion: Good lens in every aspect base: construction, handling, nititezza, brightness, weight, price and so on. Going instead to evaluate the stabilizer is not great. my specimen has a sharp front of the menu, which I correct focus SLR with a +12 and I honestly do not feel like sending it in for service. Well suited for portraits where the 2.8 on a 90mm by soddisfazioni.Ora really nice considering it was designed to do macro VC and AF are not important to me. I think it is the best compromise price / performance. However, I would live in quiet even with the old model. sent on December 14, 2013 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Price, weight, yield (if you do not have too many claims), stabilizer in my opinion exceptional Cons: A little spring the zoom ring, just a sharp 280-300mm, AF indecisive in low light. Opinion: I took this lens more out of curiosity than anything else. It grips well even though on the stand and 6D we would have been well under a collar. Af fast enough in standard situations (with the 6D can focus on Jupiter and 300mm kenko 2X Afanche if loupe). Sturdy plastic but also has a great hood. On FF cartoon. Learning it you manage to bring out interesting shots. Personally I block to 280mm with an optional elastic type and photos that come out are pretty sharp and well contrasted. I think it's the right choice especially on APSC. I highly recommend ... if your budget is to not waste your time. sent on December 13, 2013 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Sensor spectacular especially at high ISO. Advantages of a FF in a compact body. Wi-Fi is very convenient for time lapse and remote shutter release via smartphones, wi-fi is also convenient to view photos via cell phone ... with the camera in your backpack. With optical right fails to focus almost dark with the central point a-3EV. Cons: Mon counts as against it? Comsuma GPS as a microwave oven even with the camera off .. so the only active if needed. Opinion: But wait ... how do I consider "against" the characteristics specified on the box as well, shots per second, 1slot for sd, etc? The car is fine to take pictures ... the quality is superb. Its compact size is relative ... and with the BGE6 becomes larger as needed. The points of maf are few compared with the 5dm3 but well positioned. The final word ... amazing. sent on October 28, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
