RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Vincenzo Genovese
www.juzaphoto.com/p/VincenzoGenovese



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Vincenzo Genovese


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

nikon_180aisNikon 180mm f/2.8 ED Ai-S

Pros: optical and mechanical quality, bokeh, colors, contrast and much more,

Cons: Delicate front lens, MAF ring a bit too frictioned for my taste

Opinion: They talk about it so well everywhere that in a moment of ordinary nostalgia I took one too, from Japan, equal to the new at an honest price. I reserve the right to update in the future after testing it a bit, for now everything fantastic except perhaps the ring of the maf a little too frictioned, a bit like the milvus to be clear, so much so that I sold the milvus to resume the same focal lengths but of the classic series.

sent on August 25, 2023


nikon_z7iiNikon Z7 II

Pros: resolution, weight, menu', af, video.

Cons: for now nothing, needs adequate lenses

Opinion: I've always had nikon SLR up to d 850, with the advent of ml I took a few years ago z6 and then return to d850, now I switched to z7ll and at first glance I was quite satisfied. I immediately replaced the zoom 24-70f4 with 24-70 f2.8z because 'it did not stand absolutely the comparison with my old equipment, I'm satisfied with the resolution, the speed' operating, the af, video compartment, finally I go out with a backpack' lighter, double slot etc. For now I'm quite satisfied although I still believe that as files and usable lenses d850 is superior. The lenses z I tried them all, the 24-70 2.8s and the 50mm z are two optics that fully solve that sensor, the f4 did not convince me even a little for the file and for the assembly. For now, however, I have not pulled out any photo that can compare it to d850 + zeiss optics or tamron f1.4 as a general rendering and realism and I think it is more 'a speech of optics. we'll see and update' in the future maybe after a bit of tests even with ftz.

sent on July 19, 2021


nikon_z24-70_f2-8sNikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S

Pros: Quality of the files, it can almost very well replace the fixed s except the 50 mm, made in japan.

Cons: For now nothing

Opinion: Taken for two days, I reserve the right to test it even before judging it definitively. It is a bit big and heavy but in the well-balanced context with the z7ll, the plastics are of good quality even if the barrel that protrudes could work it better, for the rest the "pro" feeling is felt. L I took it after buying the z7ll in kit with 24/70 f4 , l f4 unfortunately L I found it expensive for what it offers, compact but too sharp, flat, and unusable in close portraits if not post-produced heavily to eliminate all the imperfections even non-existent skin etc., try to make a portrait and look at the hair, they look like wire, too sharp, dry, without volume, it looks more like a scan than a photo ? The 2.8 unlike what is said, has nothing to do with the f4, it is not only brighter and more expensive of course, but returns sharp files but not for reproduction. The realism, three-dimensionality and general rendering are of an excellent level even if lower than some of my zeiss. Compared with 24,35,50 and 85 s I can say that it manages to replace them all except for the brightness' obviously and the only one that I consider superior is the 50 mm S, they could certainly do better but as long as we want lenses without any defect will continue to add lenses with all the pros and cons, for now vote 9.

sent on June 29, 2021


nikon_z24-70_f4sNikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S

Pros: Compact, light, very sharp

Cons: Expensive for what it also offers in kits.

Opinion: I bought this lens in kit with the z7ll a week ago, it's light, versatile, very sharp, but besides that I didn't find any other pros to keep it for. I'm used to it, but this view for the price it's sold for should have other-level performance. It distorts so much at 24 and 70 to align a little on 30 mm, excellent for reproductions and if used wide, but realism, microcontrast and three-dimensionality are fugitives, on z6 it makes better, on z7 returns files too "dry and flat" in fact it will immediately go on the market, much better the tammy 17/35 2.8-4 with ftz that I compared to 24 and 35mm. I know that the photos are not 100% designed but the sorceress hides there, extension of the double telescopic barrel that honestly does not give me that feeling of future reliability, better perhaps invest in the various z-fixes, or fall back on other optics with ftz Voto 4. we'll see how he behaves on 24/70 z 2.8.

sent on June 26, 2021


zeiss_milvus15_f2-8Zeiss Milvus 15mm f/2.8

Pros: Global rendering, mechanics and refined design as mom zeiss got us used to it

Cons: Almost none

Opinion: Taken for a few months now but cause covid I still have to know it well, the lack of af does not make itself felt, focusing is a moment, stellar mechanics and very well balanced on d850. The only doubt that I still have to deepen is that it seems to resist the flares better but I think it is less sharp than its 15 mm classic predecessor and this would dry me a little since I bought it having tried the old and on the advice of many, web, forums etc who all said that it was identical to the old, same optical scheme but with a new and tropicalized dress. See.

sent on May 09, 2021


tamron_sp35_f1-4Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD

Pros: Sharpness, three-dimensionality, microcontrasto, construction

Cons: Not received

Opinion: I bought this optics for about a month on the advice of an acquaintance of mine, I own various nikon optics, zeiss, had sigma and then resold and I must say that after the 24mm afs 1.4, the milvus 100mm f2 and the 15 and 21 this was what made me happy again. It has a frightening sharpness already at 1.4 Characteristic common to many others you would say, yes, but finding an optics at this price that is so sharp already from 1.4 with the microcontrast of a zeiss is very difficult. Vote 10 . Back focus - 3 put in place with tap-in , on the other hand I also have many nikons with even correction in the room at +/-7 so promoted with full marks for now.

sent on November 14, 2020




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me