|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Andreaplus www.juzaphoto.com/p/Andreaplus  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XF 8mm f/3.5 R WR Pros: Very small size, solid construction, great sharpness already at full aperture, screw filters Cons: I would have preferred it brighter... but it would then have a larger size, and a higher price, sharpness at the edges slightly lower. Opinion: Lens really well built, contained in size to be a 12mm FF equivalent. Important distortion in RAW but disappears completely with the lens profile. My error of judgment had led me to mount a step-up ring from 62mm to 67mm to avoid a possible vignetting ... but it had the opposite effect! Using filters of its right diameter does not vignette with CPL or ND. Finally I found that at the minimum focusing distance and at full aperture has a very pleasant bokeh (for an extreme wide angle of course). sent on July 05, 2023 |
 | Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR Pros: Improved in all its weak points including the minimum focusing distance (which made me switch to 90mm f2 at the time) from the construction (excellent now the aperture ring) to the elimination of outlines in bokeh balls! Brava Fuji Cons: At the moment not found I will reserve the right to correct the "cons" eventually. The only drawback (always in my opinion) is the embarrassing plastic hood! I bought an aluminum JJC, elegant, contained in the measures and perfectly functional. Finally, it wouldn't hurt to equip it with an ND8 filter. But maybe that's asking too much :) Opinion: A nice leap forward compared to its predecessor (APD version included) impressive IQ and improved bokeh (at least for my taste). Aperture ring finally at the height and focus a little more solid and frictioned that does not hurt when you focus manually at f1.2 I can only recommend it to those like me who love portraiture. On my X-T5, with its 40 mega pixels, it goes that it is a wonder ... P.S. the minimum focusing distance is less than the declared 50cm!!! sent on May 18, 2023 |
 | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R Pros: Old-time lens, distortion, colors, bokeh, minimum maf distance Cons: The way I mean photography... nobody Opinion: I heard some cooked and raw on this goal, diaphragm ring too soft, car focus slow, the barrel ing out, not tropicalized, blah blah blah blah! Use it to take pictures and not to take test charts and you realize that you have a little jewel in your hands... by the way, even the Leica goals, are not topicalized, the barrel comes out and the focus car does not have it at all, but they are considered among the best lenses in the world!!! sent on April 21, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR Pros: The image quality already at TA, excellent mechanical construction and improved in the hardness of the adjustment of the aperture, low weight for a ... 135mmf2, ring excellent MAF as in all Fujifilm models, weather resistant, price! Cons: Annoying interior noise due to the new MAF system, but ... only the machine off. sopportabilissimo Opinion: It is not much that click with this amazing goal, but within the first files I was amazed by its quality of imagine at full aperture. The color rendering is superb. Its construction ... wonderful. Comparing it to the Nikon DC 135 I had (also a gem), the Fuji wins hands and files that I see here on Juza ... even on the Canon !!! The speed of MAF has improved a lot but would not recommend anyway for sports photos (Fuji here a bit) must become more involved. Fuji good, a good step forward and important thing, is listening to the criticism of its users ... if you please! Last positive note, the minimum focusing distance 60cm ... (used in conjunction with the extension tube Fuji 11mm ... becomes virtually a Macro) !!! sent on December 08, 2015 |
 | Nikon D810 Pros: Sensor, ergonomics, ease of use (still benefited from the fact that they had the D3), extremely quiet, 64ISO, flash on board (which never hurts) Crazy dynamic range, burst in DX format, light weight, 36 million pixel .. . Cons: Yet I found it ... I would not be sorry if he still had the dual slot CF, but apparently there was no room! Opinion: Happy owner of a few months of this camera body, in my opinion, outstanding! Coming from a flagship like the D3 have not heard particular deficiencies, but ... the quality of the raw is amazing! I found impressive dynamic range! I heard in the management of difficulty and shake-forum ... I personally I had none. sent on February 25, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 85mm f/1.4 D Pros: building nothing short of excellent, hood dotaziione metal! light output, color yield, resistance to flare, very good already at full aperture (but these lenses buy them just for this no?) sharpness in the corners? If you wanted it ... in a 85mm f1.4 perhaps looking for a wide angle for landscapes ... Cons: you have to be picky to find ... me from all that is required because the photos do not look at them under the microscope ever! Opinion: I travel with the 'D AF 20-35mm f2.8 and 85mm in this bag, it can be enough? if you find it at a good price used not hesitate to buy it and you will not regret ever. Maybe the yield is slightly lower than the new model but the construction type Tank its hood in metal, the optical quality etc.. etc.. I did opt for its purchase. sent on May 24, 2014 |
 | Nikon 20-35mm f/2.8 D IF Pros: construction of the past, great zoom range especially if you bring a first target for reporting, ability to mount filters, resistance to flare, used already at full aperture, color rendering and image quality. Cons: minimum distance of MAF and the fact that the original lens hood is now practically impossible to find ... but I've never missed !!! Opinion: If you are looking for perfection and optical images to look more under the microscope than with the heart ... to contact lenses last generation. This little gem is built with precision and care that is no easy find. The yield is good already at full aperture and if you do landscaping just close the aperture for sharp corners. The backlight is not an issue. Its natural range is still the reportage ... bring your trips and you will find that you will not need to bring much more! I often travel alone with this AF 20-35 f2.8 D attached to my D810 and an AF 85 f1.4 D bag ... people meditate meditate. sent on May 24, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G II Pros: Lightweight, value for money, great sharpness, even at TA, focal length range ideal for reportage Cons: Quality construction ... point! Opinion: I use it often as a lens to do everything when I travel, together with the 55-200. I think it's an exquisite quality considering that I purchased for only 50euro ...! The distortion at 18mm is contained. Obviously, if you search for the perfection and brightness, we must inevitably turn to "champion" top of the range Nikon house. sent on October 07, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
