|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fabrizio.diletti www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fabrizio.diletti  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 D Pros: construction, zoom range, mellow colors and blurry Cons: for the type of lens and the construction period, no Opinion: really well made lens. excellent hike for almost everyone, uses. since all do, to portraiture, his companion for trips. if necessary, it can also be used to TA, but from f / 5.6 to f / 8 expresses its maximum. very beautiful mellow colors and the typical soft blurry these af-d glasses. macro function very convenient, really. on the go and there's a small detail, ready the macro function can be activated with a switch is ready. autofocus fast enough for all uses. very correct as distortion. I got to try current goals and I have to say that this lens definitely not bear comparison. sent on October 10, 2016 |
 | Nikon 50mm f/1.2 AI-s Pros: construction, brightness, sharpness Cons: nobody Opinion: fantastic lens. focuse to f / 1.2 it is really to be trial by fire, but see the eye of a subject in focus from the near side and see it blurred the far side is really intriguing. 1.2 to blur effect that can please, as to me, or not. clear already at f / 2, good at f / 4 maximum f / 5.6, after which the image, as natural for an f / 1.2, very good degrada.rnsfocato, readable, used to portraiture is great and the maf precise manual and light not to be problems with the exception of children ... where sometimes even a afs is enough! rnlo very often used for night shots ... spectacular! sent on October 10, 2016 |
 | Nikon 24mm f/2 Ai-s Pros: small maximum aperture Cons: poor sharpness Opinion: 24 f / 2 ... frankly a disappointment. the maximum opening embarrassing sharpness, no blur effect type 50 f / 1.2 that can have a purpose. no, everything is mixed. We have to close at least f / 4 to improve a little bit the quality that then grows closing. but at that point I asked myself what is the point purchase an f / 2, and pay him for that, if f / 2 is almost unusable? much better than the 24 f / 2.8 that pays a stop aperture but which is already usable at f / 2.8. to make matters worse in the loss of backlight contrast is citica. sent on October 10, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF Zoom-Micro 70-180mm f/4.5-5.6D ED Pros: zoom range, color rendering, macro function, mechanical Cons: dim Opinion: only lens of its kind. only real macro zoom manufactured by Nikon. Made of warm colors and pasty typical of af-d.rnPaga models somewhat low maximum aperture but amply rewarded by the performance very much bella.rnSiamo agree on non suddenness autofocus (during the production of this lens the afs were only a dream) but for human subjects is more than enough, for macro small animal better go on maf manual that is practical and precise. impeccable construction and the feeling, which corresponds to reality, great solidità.rnla macro function is really good, even at 180mm you can focuse just over 30cm, ok is not 1: 1 ... rnTorno telling myself on rendition color and softness that modern struggle aims to have, maybe they have other characteristics (afs, dwarves, vr); depends on use and tastes, I also had the 70-200 f / 4 vr and how performance has disappointed me so much that I sold, after one month and after deferring in nital perchè thought I had problems ... that aveva.rn sent on October 10, 2016 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: sharpness, construction, blurred Cons: nothing has come ... Opinion: I had the chance to try for a few days the above sigma and Nikon 35 f / 1.4 afs. I am possessor of dozens of optical nikon and always faithful to the brand for the happiness of the nikon speakers ... but not this time. I took the sigma and less than half the cost of the nikon there is no field in which sigma is less ... indeed. there are a lot of reviews about it, mine is more a reflection shared with you ... never used more than f / 4 and sharpness in the center is already very good at f / 1.4, only close to retrieve the edges and have a minimum pdc. sent on October 06, 2016 |
 | Nikon 20-35mm f/2.8 D IF Pros: construction, focal length, distortion control Cons: cool colors and minimum distance of focus, suffers a bit with the latest sensors Opinion: Lens always very valuable and virtually indestructible. no motor, no stabilizer. metal and glass, and very little to break. very good control of distortion and focal range valid for almost all occasions. f / 2.8 is still a bit soft but already from f / 4 improves a lot and always growing up to f / 8. my only personal disappointment as the color tone a little bit cold and incised, at least in my copy. Minimum focusing distance now outdated. the purchase depends on the price at which you find it, there are other viable cheaper lenses (only as to price) as the tokina 20-35, also very sturdy metal and glass, the better the variable aperture f / 3.5-4.5 hard successor f / 2.8; had all three lenses of which I speak and I held tokina 20-35 3.5-4.5, it all depends on what one should do. sent on October 06, 2016 |
 | Nikon 20mm f/3.5 Ai-S Pros: mechanical and optical quality, size Cons: none Opinion: large lens from nikon history. minimum distortion can also be used for architecture. pocket-sized for a superb quality wide angle. good image quality already at room temperature and excellent from f / 5.6; I agree with Caneca regarding the use on super pixelated today where 20 3.5 suffers a little but remains at the highest levels. It recommended to keep in the bag if you do not have other wide-angle zoom. used on d700 and d750 also for long night exposures with excellent results. sent on October 06, 2016 |
 | Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x Pros: quality, cost, versatility Cons: Touch does not seem very sturdy Opinion: I'm satisfied with this multiplier. I use it with telephoto zoom Nikon 70-200 f / 2.8 vr2 and sometimes with the 300 f / 2.8 to f and I must say that the image quality, even falls compared to the use of these straight goals, is always good and usabilissima . I tried the manual and the tc 14 tc 14 eii and, to tell the truth, I have not felt better photo quality and also the tc eii, as the current successor, can only be used with afs objectives while kenko eat virtually everything from manuals, to af and to afs. It does not seem to see it at the top of solidity but also with the 300 2.8 can be used without problems. last but not least because the very advantageous price, both new that used, for a multiplier that does its job and does it in great way. sent on October 06, 2016 |
 | Tokina AF 20-35mm f/3.5-4.5 Pros: Construction, focal range, image quality, little distortion Cons: No hood, need at least 1 closing stop diaphragms Opinion: Another solid old style target of tokina.rnUsato good as objective reportage, landscapes, or wide-rounder will give you good pictures and feel of handling a lens and not a true plasticotto ... use I encountered a slight response but underexposed that with a minimum of knowledge of the lens is unable to avoid. The image quality is good but to have improvements should be closed slightly to at least one stop and f / 5.6 to 8 will have the best results even if, I repeat, is usabilissimo also TA.rnManca of the lens hood series. Objective of the substance, glass and metal. relatively cheap in the used market and certainly mechanically will not give you any problems. Good lens can also be used to view the architecture little distortion sent on October 06, 2016 |
 | Zenit MC Zenitar 16mm f/2.8 Fisheye Pros: Sharpness, compact, solid feel, price Cons: Front plug (a detail) Opinion: Taken in September 2016, new model 2015, straight from Mother Russia for a total of 170 euro.rnDa immediately feels solid and well made. Used on the field I was very pleased. The use of fx and did not notice vignetting even at RT. Usable without af / 2.8 problems becomes good at f / 5.6 and very good at f / 8-11. It is a toy for the cost and the quality is absolutely valid to have fun with some personality photos but usable, if kept in a bubble and without vertical lines at the edges nearby, such as wide angle. Good resistance to flare, in the mean of wide angles. I had the same focal length fisheye Nikkor and honestly not known differences worth noting. My judgment is positive and I would recommend it to anyone who wants to have a very good fish at an affordable price since new. All right, does not have the coat of arms of the nikkor ... but the quality is sometimes spending less does not mean to be disappointed. sent on October 05, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X10 Pros: timeless classic style, quality files, completeness settings Cons: no data viewfinder, slowness in writing Opinion: I tried and got this fuji hoping to get decent pictures when I do not need, or want ... to bring all the equipment enclosure with me.rndevo honestly say that my hopes were clearly met. This little car has surprised me, though now dated succeeds in conditions where they do all the advantages of an SLR may not be so important, to offer really good pictures. the commands and the various settings are all there as the exposure lock, maf block, maf point, type of exposure, compensation, in short, a little of everything that is needed and each function has its own button. compact body, but strong and good ergonomics. I use it mainly in jpg + raw and aperture priority and I have always enjoyed it. exposure (Center-weighted) substantially without big mistakes, with a bit of knowledge of the car you can not go wrong. It has so many voices in the menus and various settings for the type of photos but I do not use. I took it for hiking and city walks without too many priestIf photographic. iso fine up to 800 then it goes degrading but if necessary also to 3200 brings home the still photos. 28-112 zoom range which allows a little all-purpose, good aim and bright. I am quite amazed by the quality and cleanliness of the picture softer but not oversaturated. I also had the mirrorless, not of the latest generation, and compares this fuji high to head out and perhaps maybe even a better flush. no comparison with other compact camera, a different planet. I would strongly advise you to those who appreciate the photos together without going to crop to 1000% or count pixels. up to A4 size, and no problem with raw files you can correct any errors or post-producing well. negative I found the viewfinder which on one hand is sufficiently comfortable and usable especially in battery saving perspective but unfortunately did not inside any type of data. I also found a certain slowness in the writing of files. I have two original batteries, but also with a consumption is not that bad, but they certainly have a second soprattutto if you're out all day is recommended. My judgment is very positive thanks to photo quality that is able to produce, its compactness and aesthetics that, once cleared all the other positives, manages to be the icing on the cake. sent on October 05, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
