|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nicobellic www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nicobellic  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Pros: Lightness, tropicalized, stabilizer, JPEG, Wi-Fi Cons: Depth of field of the M4/3, cervellotic menu, Batteries Opinion: I took it as the second camera, plus 6d. I immediately appreciated the body weight/lens, the stabilization is truly remarkable. Wi-Fi allows you to use your smartphone as a remote control and immediately export your photos. The defect (if you can consider such) greater I find it in the exaggerated PDC due to the nature of the M 4 3, and the battery a bit ' poor. Accustomed to the weight of the FF I find myself a featherweight, and if paired with a pancake is almost pocketable. The menu is really to be studied well, it is a concentrate of technology, I will never be able to exploit it to 100% this to say that it offers more than what I need. I printed a photo 50x100 and the result is scary, super sharpness and challenge to recognize the difference from a picture of a full format. I can only recommend it, it is a jewel of camera. sent on January 31, 2019 |
 | Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-60mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS Pros: Used price, focal range, weight, construction, sharpness, tropicalized, lens hood including Cons: 3.5-5.6 Opinion: Good lens everything to do, covers from wide angle to medium tele, comfortable in most cases, including lens hoods. It offers excellent sharpness, also thanks to the M43 sensor, I use it on WCO 5mkii, the only new opening, but it is still a good quality compromise at the right price. I recommend it to those who like me, wants to carry around from 24mm to 120mm equivalent, in a single lens, for light outputs. sent on January 12, 2019 |
 | Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: zoom range, sharpness, construction, AF, stabilizer Cons: hood part, derives barrel, 3.5-5.6 Opinion: Sold when they are passed to the full-size, and bought back when I added a new aps as irreplaceable for the convenience of focal lengths, virtually no ultrasonic più.AF the detachment fast and very accurate, color returns ottimi.Lo stabilizer is very effective, 3 stops, not four as stated for me.L only flaw is that the hood you have to buy separately, and saw the price, I do not think sforassero the budget if it is 2.8 includevano.Non hard, but I was so necessary, distorts a bit to 15mm as all lower-wide angle zoom, just that this part 15 and not by the excellent 18.Costruzione classics, and significant weight make this lens a handyman who does everything and so much respect bene.Costa to others, but it is the only one that can range from wide angle to telephoto without sacrificing quality. sent on February 03, 2017 |
 | Canon EOS M Pros: Compact, more portable, file quality Cons: Af slow and imprecise, battery life, lack viewfinder Opinion: Good mirrorless, without many pretensions, you get good photos from great dettaglio.personalmente I miss the viewfinder also having the 6d, does not compare, and as dynamic range as ergonomia.Ma the use for the outputs read only the lens kit, and I always have with me the chance to take pictures of qualità.L adapter for ef objectives is useful, but up to 50cc, the biggest you lose the convenience of a compact and lightweight mirrorless kit. sent on October 25, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
