|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ema88 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ema88  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XC 50-230mm f/4.5-6.7 OIS Pros: Value, sharpness, lightweight Cons: Hood, dark Opinion: Purchased used, but in excellent condition 150 EUR and applies them all either positive or negative. I never liked the paintings, fattostà that of Canon I've never had one, here I wanted to try and I must say I was impressed. It was dark (and here is worth 150 € in negative) but as long as there is light does not weigh you and photos are full of detail (which is the value of € 150 in the positive views that churns out the photos!). Sore point the lens hood, it will ruin watching it and ..... seems to 230mm Captain Hook from extending the barrel and hood hat put there before. sent on March 16, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X-T10 Pros: Materials, sensor, and features retro style Cons: Battery Opinion: I came from Canon 600D with dedicated optical aps-c. After trying it from a friend, I fell in love literally the solidity of the materials, but above all the jpeg ready and yield at high ISO! Up to ISO 3200 is almost free from noise, in 6400 there is noise but nothing tragic and utilizzabilissimo. The machine is solid, well-built and aluminum, but not Tropicalized unlike the big sister, but to me this did not care. Poor battery life, 200/250 shots depending on how we use the display to check the photos or not, then at least one other is required to have a good battery, but you know, the mirrorless are energy intensive. I have small hands, so as ergonomics I found myself very well, even with the 50-230 tele. This fact I think it is subjective, so needless to us a review about. sent on March 16, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm XF 18-55 f/2.8-4R LM OIS Pros: Construction, image quality, bright aperture (f.2.8 / 4.0) Cons: Hood Opinion: Well, coming from Canon / Nikon / Pentax and think it is the classic 18-55 kits? Forget it. Aperture f2.8 / 4, constructed in metal, solid, smooth, fluid and picture quality amazing! The only negative is the lens hood that fits when you and 2 strains, comes away with a puff and the motor focus (but only because I was used all'USM home Canon), but is not clear about the noise, but for the lower speed. But for the photos that I do is fine così.rnLa stabilization seems to me less than the Canon counterpart, but only slightly, we will stop on the 2 and a half (but still less than 4 declaring the house) .rnUsato is 250 €, buy on the fly if you do not avete.rnSe not require a diaphragm so bright (I after the 2.8 constant Canon I could not help it) turns on brother 16-50 f3.5 / 5.6, which despite being dark and plasticky, like quality image is very close! sent on October 20, 2015 |
 | Zenit Helios MC 44M-4 58mm f/2.0 Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, build quality Cons: Maf ring and contrast Opinion: Purchased (25 € on ebay shipped from the UK in good condition) to try it on and then Canon Fuji now. If the first set aps-c was happy I was, on the Fuji are stunned. I version 44-4, then 6-blade, slightly less than 44-2 to 8, but when practical changes very little, bokeh particular and there was what I interessava.rnLa ring runs pretty well, but I find oil, I do not know whether to seniority or less. RNLA construction is typical of those years, metal and glass, glass and metal. A tank in every sense! Nothing to say! RNI colors are slightly washed out, the lens does not think it's MC, then against sun suffer a bit, but nothing serious in any of the two cases. sent on October 08, 2015 |
 | AmazonBasics - Zaino per fotocamera e accessori Pros: Price, space Cons: Tripod, interior partitions, no rain cover Opinion: Purchased from a year I use it for trips out of town or longer where I carry a little more stuff. His work makes him very well, only flaws I believe are engaging external to the tripod a little uncomfortable, the dividers in themes that deform easily (especially the central ones) and back, that spring to late September makes you The crash diet! rnAvrei enjoyed a possible cover for rain leggera.rnPer € 25 I find it a best buy for the amateur photographer. sent on July 01, 2015 |
 | GoPro Hero Entry Level Pros: Economic, battery life, quality gopro Cons: Video camera is not removable from the houses, built-in battery, long time lapse not editable by 0.5 sec. Opinion: Purchased for just over 110 € I find this excellent room to enter the sector action cam. Excellent quality, long-lived battery (over 2 hours at 720p 60 frames) the great superview 720p that expands on the already high degree of field offered by large lente.rnL only negativity I faced and inability to vary the timing of the time lapse (fixed about 0.5) as it would be only a software implementation and hardware, so I do not understand the choice of casa.rnCamera not removable from the case, can be negative in the case of damage to it, but I see something unlikely in use objectionable. Even the battery is integrated, negative too because in the long probably will not hold the same charge cycles. sent on January 17, 2015 |
 | LG Nexus 5 Pros: Price, performance, speed, pure Android Cons: Coating material "poor" Opinion: I've always had android called "pure" Nexus series and have always been skeptical of LG confrondi. I think two weeks ago on the offer of a chain and I'm delighted to 299 € purchase. Fast, responsive, accessible. Kitkat interface is easy to use, excellent implementation with Google Now that slowly is expanding well in our market interaction. The camera is decent, not the top, but then for less than 300 € you can not expect tutto.rnAltra positive note that I have found is the display, amoled accustomed to, I thought of undergoing a change and actually like loyalty Color me feel better. The only flaw I find in the non-optimal visibility under direct sunlight and not just blacks ottimi.rnPiccola negative note the rubberized coating, which I find fragile. sent on June 19, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III Pros: Discreet first approach. Cons: Slow and soon "close". Opinion: Optics that is in the kit and this says it all. There can expect excellent photos, but to learn, experiment and see to their needs is buona.rnLa optical quality from the best around f.8 and light conditions easier. Bad backlight and night where you can focus only manually, as the AF is hard and does not hook almost never. sent on January 08, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Optical quality, resistance to flare and distortion very controlled. Cons: Construction and equipment at a price that Canon him to propose. Opinion: As already indicated in the pros and cons optical quality is really impressive, it returns the file already practically perfect and clean. Great colors, exceptional resistance to flare and distortions against almost nulle.rnDi the price is high, the building is typical of the area reserved for the lens APS-C and for the price its not negligible for the European market imposed by Canon, we expected at least a accessory (albeit minimal) type lens hood and / or bag where riporlo.rnrnAd However if you find a good offer is a lens to have if you love landscapes and street. sent on January 08, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
