|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Roberto Marchitelli www.juzaphoto.com/p/RobertoMarchitelli  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 5Ds R Pros: Files very detailed, good iso made for its resolution, excellent color fidelity, light meter new generation, silent mirrorbox, good dynamic range Cons: Raw huge, burst just enough, reflex not for everyone Opinion: I come from 5D3 who accompanied me faithfully for 4 years, about a month ago I switched to 5DSR. Reflex at first twin view, the same arrangement of keys, same menu as 90%, the same f (but with the addition of the matrix rgb ITR), I took even the same battery grip.rnIl sensor 50 mpx gives details never seen before if you do not in medium format, the raw is very affected and contrasted, in post needs a work a little different from other birds in sensori.rnUsata pulls out even the finest plumage, with natural detail (http://www.juzaphoto.com /hr.php?t=1931561&r=71287&l=it), in post sharpness should be given very parsimonia.rnLa dynamics are improved, especially on the shadows, there is no banding but Canon's choice has left less on recovery lights much more easily can get to risk clip.rnLa made on 'complexion is good, more natural leathers. The white balance has been enhanced with a new option: the white priorities. The classic autowhite you tarava sn the average of 'full color scene, now you can set the discriminant: the white will be automatically calibrated on the more neutral tone, with results of 90% perfetti.rnIl AF module is that of 5D3, precise and handsome, has l' addition of 'ITR, ie the fire with RGB matrix (virtually adds the recognition of colors in addition to the classical phase), with the multipliers is much faster than the 5D3.rnLa burst is 5 fps, slower than the 5D3 but extremely silent, so that the silent mode at the time I also useless with a few animals metri.rnL 'meter boasts many more areas than the 5D3 and rarely rod, you may eventually lose its setting in the EV M and AutoISO (a true salvation) .rnI against are easy to imagine, Raw heavy (50 to 80 MB), many occupied cards and slower post on pc.rnNon is a car for everyone, it should be understood and used to the best of its potential, it must be helped with a high isoresize post that leads to a yield (sometimes even higher) to 5D3.rnConcludendo, if you have optical quality and want maximum performance is the perfect choice if you want speed rather you will have to orient yourself on altro.rn rn sent on August 06, 2016 |
 | Canon 7D Mark II Pros: Massive body, fast, af enabled to F 8, excellent exposure, file better than the previous model Cons: E 'an APS-C, for the same field of view can not compete with a minimally FF of the penultimate and last generation, sucks a little too much battery Opinion: Here I am, after a month from 'purchase I can pull the first sum: I took the 7D2 to tile to my faithful companion 5D3, exclusively for photography naturalistaca.rnCorpo twin of 5D3, batteries compatible and interchangeable, has pretty much the same menu of sister except small variazioni.rnGià from the first test out his character ultrasportivo, fast, lightning-fast AF, much more precise metering of the 5D3 (probably due to the smaller size of the areas analyzed and digic 6) .rnProprio the 'AF has brought havoc in the forums around the world: some stock needed calibration room service to return precise. Another problem is the 'extreme nervousness in AI-Servo, tends to focuse continuously even if the subject is stationary, the fault of the micro movements of' optical (also properties we breathe and therefore we are not). I solved using the CASE 3 subjects for stationary or slow and CASE 5 with ITR active for fast, so I have about 90% of shots in focus (of course for those who only see the shotsol the percentages drop physiologically) .rnAF active until 8 F: in this way I can get to 1600 mm with the potential 500 F 4 + 2X, quality full frame is very good, better than the crop of 5D3.rnDiscorso noise: much improved grain than the previous model, much finer and easier to remove without planing mercilessly details, usable up to ISO 4000 if c 'is light and we need fast times (but I'm fine palate, maybe you can settle and push even more). At high iso (say from 2000 onwards), begins to take blows from 5D3 and also seems to me right, we say that the difference between the 2 quantifies in 1.5-2 stop, depending on the conditions luce.rnQualità file : good, surprised me positively, provided you shoot wisely and choose the right light sensor is not a forgiving sufficiency. Compared to the 5D3 file is less plastic, less three-dimensional, has a very steep curve of chiaroscuro, seems to lack a little in the intermediate tones, but hasa good seal on the shadows. Even the colors are in favor of 5D3, much richer sfumature.rnConcludendo, I am very satisfied, shot at the first light of 'sunrise with the 5D3 and after with 7d2, same batteries, charger itself, the menu that I know by heart, I the 'needed to address every type of shot. Find great file quality can turn his attentions on FF, those looking for speed, multiplication factor and the latest technology at a price human can easily jump on the 7D2, you'll learn how to put it right in the shooting conditions and did not disappoint. sent on April 01, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 500mm f/4 L IS II USM Pros: Ultra sharp, micro-contrast at the highest livelli.rnStabilizzatore 4 stops, allowing shots to stationary subjects with unthinkably lenti.rnAbituato times in the first round, this is a minimum piuma.rnMaf that earns a meter compared to vecchio.rnCon the extenders is great already full aperture. Cons: There is a zoom, price. Opinion: Start by saying that I was a satisfied user of the model series 1, but this is a total of 2 steps higher. It has everything you could ask for in a big white lens, with the added weight and maneuverability of a sorprendenti.rnHa A resolution crazy, as demonstrated by the fact that with the 2x to f8 is very clear and the way is' ready for optics sensors ff ultra-dense. rnHo advantage of the price below average for this time to exchange your old, with 2,000 Euros I brought it to casa.rnLo highly recommend it to those who can afford, along with the 300 II and 600 II is the best for wildlife. sent on November 15, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 2.0x III Pros: Minimal degradation of the image quality of a closing stop, tropical conditions drastically reduced chromatic aberration. Cons: You will lose 2 stops of brightness, in some lenses the autofocus slows down considerably. Opinion: I use it often on 500 f 4 is and the image quality is very high returns (closed at least af 9), l 'f slows down significantly: with the airborne it takes a little handle to get good results. Mounted on 70-200 2.8 II instead, the af is very fast, the degradation in terms of quality is little, but still greater than in the 500 f 4 is probably due to the different risolvenza of 2 ottiche.rnIn Ultimately, the board strongly to those who have high-quality super-telephoto (400 2.8, 500 f 4, 600 f 4, both series 1 and 2) and those with a 70-200 f 2.8 II for occasional hunting or photographic outdoor sports. sent on August 13, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 500mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Solid, crystal clear, stand in wonder multipliers, take the price on the market. Cons: Weighs about 4 kg, stabilizer and Af older generation. Opinion: An adjective that sums it up: RAZOR SHARP! RnOttica razor sharp already at full aperture, closed in half-stop is the same with many 1.4. That gives the bokeh is creamy and pleasant, the autofocus system is slightly slower than my 400 5.6, but precise. Requires a bit of effort to be used because of its size, but the results that gives more than make up the sforzo.rnUn must-have :-) sent on January 23, 2013 |
 | Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x Pros: Economic (new paid 176 euro) - QI good-Mounts all optical unlike the Canon-Maintains autofocus to F 8 Cons: Building a little plasticky-not-tropicalized a little vignette Opinion: Use this extender combined with the EOS 5D Mark III + 400 5.6 and I'm strasoddisfatto, autofocus works on all points even af ??8 without hesitation and is accurate (practically the same performance as never 7D + 400 5.6 smooth) . Fast in pursuit, I did not expect performance like that. In my gallery you can see some examples. The negative notes (negligible) concern the vignetting (eliminated by slight crop) and a dash of lateral chromatic aberration on the strong contrasts of light. Ultimately very good in the center to the edges. I highly recommend it for good money. sent on July 22, 2012 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: Excellent sensor, weather sealed body, AF fast and accurate, no problems with banding, silent shooting, advanced software, at least 3 stop advantage over my 7D. Cons: Lack of built-in flash, recovery of the shadows than the competition, problems with the management of the external flash (I hope to improve with firmware update) Opinion: I come from a 7D which I loved and hated for the technology for the sensor that made it to the max only in perfect lighting conditions: the 5D mk III is a great qualitative leap, from the point of view of sensitivity I found about 3 stop advantage. Allows considerable crop and maintains un'autofocus very fast on 400 + kenko 5.6 pro 300 DGX 1.4 (then F8). sent on July 06, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
