|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Lorenzo_rosa www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lorenzo_rosa  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Pentax K-70 Pros: Tropicalized, stabilized, double strap dial, right-hand commands, full features, great rendition, light weight, low bulb, adjustable screen, excellent construction Cons: Nobody for now ... maybe having only 11 focal points ... amen, I was used to only 9 focal points; 11, so much stuff. Opinion: Used all day and I fell in love! Easy commands to learn from canon that are already very simple, very complete menu, has so many of those features that I have not been able to test them all, some things only find on the most expensive and professional reflexes. RnTropicalized, I find it a grain Very useful (I often left the canon at home for that too) and for having it on other brands you have to spend a lot more.rnStabilizzato molto bene.rnCompact and lightweight: I turned and asked for opinions for a month before deciding what to buy and doubt Was to go mirrorless, but in the end I'm very happy to have chosen this k-70. In a whole day I did not seem to have touched it along with the fantastic 18-135. One ml would "disappear" in my hands and I do not know if I would have liked it so much. I forgot the adjustable screen what I already had with 600d.rnDecisamente great buy, keeping it in your hand seems to be built much better than the canon I had before. sent on August 12, 2017 |
 | Pentax SMC DA 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 ED AL (IF) DC WR Pros: Sharp, tropicalized, lightweight, little bulky, supplied hood (I come from Canon, never supplied except tamron). Cons: For what I have to do anyone, maybe the vignetting 18mm but correctable and loses sharpness to the edges. IMHO, all things you can fly over. Opinion: Used for just one full day: Great lens! Acquired with the k-70, crisp enough, more than adequate, light and extremely compact excursion to many smaller hiking lenses and above all it is tropicalized as the k70.rnVero that loses its edge Of clarity but overall I find it exactly the handyman I needed for hiking, weight, and footprint. Carried to my neck and backpack all day yesterday morning to night: I did not realize I had the picture car with me! What I was looking for! RnResults magnificent colors both in raw and in jpeg.rnAnd those who do not want to spend big digits and those who do not photograph, I recommend. sent on August 12, 2017 |
 | GoPro Hero 5 Pros: Video; weight; footprint; Voice commands; Gopro app for remote control; Rendering of the wide image; Wide range of accessories; underwater. Cons: Price; touch screen; Necessary micro sd high performance (obviously) and cost. I forgot the low battery autonomy, use it with remote control and then active wifi drinks like a gas turbine 3.0. Opinion: Purchased with the sub-cost unieuro, I would say that the purchase was great. I must surmise that I expected much more from the photo compartment, but in reality for what is being used it is fine; Because of its lightness and almost zero clutter it is easy to always have it with it. Photographic rendering as I said is not perfect, but when you shoot with the wide option and the colors gopro gives you a great file that is nice to see and the distortion it leaves is, in my opinion, very enjoyable. For videos it's great, nothing from Say, it was born as an action cam. Great slow ones. I think that on embedded definitions you have to have devices that support it because some high-res movie footage, for example, failed to display them on iphone 5S for example. RnTo get the ability to command it with voice commands, the fast rec function is good (press key Of recording from off and she begins to record, just stops turning off). Excellent remote control application though sometimes I get itserious; Blocked (I guess it's my iphone's fault a bit dated) .nnTogether I'll advise you. sent on August 09, 2017 |
 | Manfrotto MT 294 A3 Pros: Resitenza; stability. Cons: Maybe weight and size but if you want some qualities ... Opinion: Stable and very robust. Maybe a heavy and bulky clutch. My maximum load was with the Canon 600d, batterygebge bge8, two inserted batteries and tamron 70-300 at the maximum extension: never blamed the shot, always stable. I also mount the Head Manfrotto 804RC2 that you can move in every direction effortlessly. Really great. sent on August 05, 2017 |
 | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: Sharpness; brightness; equipment; weight; stabilizer, HSM; very advantageous for money provided you do not fall into a flawed specimen. Cons: The counter is not the perspective that in itself is really great .. the counter is SIGMA!! I do not recommend. Opinion: The lens is very sharp even at RT. It 'very bright, very good in cases of low light. The stabilizer is fantastic, very effective! The engine of the fire is fast and silent! In short, this lens does not seem to have anything wrong with it. The problem is Sigma. It happened to me exemplary suffering from back focus and I had to send in the warranty optic right now before you leave for the holidays. Which is annoying. I'll leave the camera at home due to poor quality control of the sigma NOT that surely will cut off 'from the optical attractive, I will never take more account of the sigma, for me it might as well fail. rnih Ultimately though it is a very good optics to avoid going to look for the bellyache not recommend it highly! Even I was in, mass, maybe that's fine, if not then okay go on warranty etc etc.. That is, the next time I avoid ... so you know, with sigma you have very good chance of having problems like that .. at this point, avoid it like the plague! sent on July 16, 2014 |
 | Canon 600D Pros: Screen that rotates, which rotates the screen and still screen that rotates: D; ease of use; megapixels; Cons: Excessive noise at high ISO; weak burst in RAW; the lack of a lock ring mode of use; coverage viewfinder Opinion: I find it a reflex almost amateurish, in my view is more powerful than a simple entry level. The fact that both the monitor and the receiver I think this is brilliant, in many occasions is really a fantastic utility! I have used thousands of times for family portraits on a tripod, turned towards us, the subject of the photo. The 18 megapixels is more than enough, give a file of all respect. The problem, therefore, does not have the lock ring functions, one annoying thing, happened to me a few times already that maybe you saw him walking and you move the camera from one hand to another or even better between the shoulder and the other ( between bg and Tamron 70-300 is nice every now and then shift your weight during long walks) to find M to A-DEP that not even know what it is and in fact the first time that happened to me I immediately realized what had happened and I took the fear that was broken because it did not respond to commands as usual; actually had moved the dial and then panic. RNLA gust & egrave; really frustrating ... shooting in Raw ... is slow and does not last long. Just today I found myself in a show of birds of prey and the burst in many cases has been slow and short-lived unfortunately .. and then stays in the BUSY, busy, while recording the short burst. In short, this is the only real drawback that I have found. For the rest, I think really FANTASTIC, although it is not a blade at high ISO. 800 rnAd falters .. Anyway, now that I know so well, I struggle to part with it .. sent on June 09, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Image quality; engine fast and accurate, efficient stabilizer. Cons: Weight; I have not been able to find a tripod mount ring (I think I understand that there is to this point) Opinion: I am very glad I made the choice to buy the Tamron 55-250 to replace the canon, the difference between the two approaches is the subitissimo note as soon as you have both hands; the 70-300 from the idea of ??being well built and when you use it you can clearly see that the stabilizer works very well, the focus is very fast and the nuts on the cylinder body have the right clutch. And 'thinking but manageable on a tripod but not really suitable tends to make its weight felt. Great product for its price. sent on May 14, 2014 |
 | Nikon Coolpix S5100 Pros: Good image quality, compact design. Cons: for the type of camera that is, no. Opinion: I would say a good compact. Bought to bring it back to the seminars JKD / Kali Escrima, where as a trainee I can not bring the camera with me for obvious reasons, and my mountain bike. The captured images are great, the image stabilizer works so dear. Also good for outings with friends, day and night because the flash does its job anyway. Great product for sure! sent on November 04, 2013 |
 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS Pros: Price, stabilizer, light and compact. Cons: Hood uncomfortable, not USM. Opinion: I have always had a great time there! I would say that at the beginning is a really good lens tele-have! Pleasantly surprised by the stabilization. Absolutely uncomfortable the hood! But essential in my opinion. Too bad it does not have the ultrasonic motor which makes it of little use in sports pictures .. But all in all I would say that it is really a very good optics! sent on September 14, 2013 |
 | Canon PowerShot SX130 IS Pros: Shutter priority, aperture and manual mode. Very good image quality, discreet zoom. Cons: I had not found except for the heifer in the viewfinder. Opinion: It 'was the bridge that led me to the purchase of an SLR. Was already set, and considering that I had a camera, I used it to take pictures at my sister's wedding and I was satisfied. Thanks to this canon and to see the equipment of the official photographer, I approached to SLR photography. You could make shots exceptional even though he had some kind pixels. But 12 were more than excellent! I regret having sold it. sent on September 05, 2013 |
 | Nikon Coolpix S31 Pros: Waterproof, shockproof, if you set the multi-shot mode can be really fast as long as there is good light. Cons: Find the quality of the photo is obviously lower than those of other compact. few customizations manuals. With the zoom you lose a lot of image quality. Opinion: I think it's really good. I bought it this year for the holidays. They last for photos of all the days I brought the Nikon Coolpix S5100 but I was always worried of any splashes of water or to the sand. Here, with this you can forget it! And I've also made some decent shots in the water and out. I asked the girl to photograph me in the air while doing a kick shot on the shore and do not believe it but in the multi-shot mode manages to be really fast to be a compact and mid-priced. Same thing with the sea a little choppy I managed to get the classic effect of freezing up. So I was very satisfied purchase! sent on September 05, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
